Exploring the fit of western PTSD models across three non-western low- and middle-income countries

Lynn Murphy Michalopoulos, George J. Unick, Emily Haroz, Judith Bass, Laura Murray, Paul A Bolton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the fit of existing Western posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) models across 3 non-Western low and middle income countries (LMIC). Secondary data analysis was conducted from studies among torture survivors in Northern Iraq, sexual violence survivors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and Burmese refugees in Thailand. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ) data to compare established Western PTSD models using (a) the 3-factor Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) 4th edition model, (b) the 4-factor “numbing” model, (c) the 4-factor “dysphoria” model, and (d) the 4- factor DSM-5 model. For both the DRC and Burma all models had adequate fit. Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) determined that the 4-factor “numbing” model was the best fit for the DRC and the 4-factor “dysphoria” model was the best fit for Burma. For Iraq, none of the models had adequate fit. Results support previous research which indicates inconsistency among Western models of PTSD among populations from LMIC. Further research should explore whether this is indicative of the context or potentially other factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-63
Number of pages9
JournalTraumatology
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2 2015

Fingerprint

Democratic Republic of the Congo
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Myanmar
Iraq
Survivors
Torture
Refugees
Sex Offenses
Thailand
Poverty
Research
Statistical Factor Analysis
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Cross-cultural
  • Factor analysis
  • Low- and middle-income country
  • Posttraumatic stress disorder
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Exploring the fit of western PTSD models across three non-western low- and middle-income countries. / Michalopoulos, Lynn Murphy; Unick, George J.; Haroz, Emily; Bass, Judith; Murray, Laura; Bolton, Paul A.

In: Traumatology, Vol. 21, No. 2, 02.03.2015, p. 55-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f045abaeae944b979fb4adee23f82627,
title = "Exploring the fit of western PTSD models across three non-western low- and middle-income countries",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to examine the fit of existing Western posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) models across 3 non-Western low and middle income countries (LMIC). Secondary data analysis was conducted from studies among torture survivors in Northern Iraq, sexual violence survivors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and Burmese refugees in Thailand. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ) data to compare established Western PTSD models using (a) the 3-factor Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) 4th edition model, (b) the 4-factor “numbing” model, (c) the 4-factor “dysphoria” model, and (d) the 4- factor DSM-5 model. For both the DRC and Burma all models had adequate fit. Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) determined that the 4-factor “numbing” model was the best fit for the DRC and the 4-factor “dysphoria” model was the best fit for Burma. For Iraq, none of the models had adequate fit. Results support previous research which indicates inconsistency among Western models of PTSD among populations from LMIC. Further research should explore whether this is indicative of the context or potentially other factors.",
keywords = "Cross-cultural, Factor analysis, Low- and middle-income country, Posttraumatic stress disorder, Validation",
author = "Michalopoulos, {Lynn Murphy} and Unick, {George J.} and Emily Haroz and Judith Bass and Laura Murray and Bolton, {Paul A}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1037/trm0000020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "55--63",
journal = "Traumatology",
issn = "1534-7656",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the fit of western PTSD models across three non-western low- and middle-income countries

AU - Michalopoulos, Lynn Murphy

AU - Unick, George J.

AU - Haroz, Emily

AU - Bass, Judith

AU - Murray, Laura

AU - Bolton, Paul A

PY - 2015/3/2

Y1 - 2015/3/2

N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the fit of existing Western posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) models across 3 non-Western low and middle income countries (LMIC). Secondary data analysis was conducted from studies among torture survivors in Northern Iraq, sexual violence survivors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and Burmese refugees in Thailand. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ) data to compare established Western PTSD models using (a) the 3-factor Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) 4th edition model, (b) the 4-factor “numbing” model, (c) the 4-factor “dysphoria” model, and (d) the 4- factor DSM-5 model. For both the DRC and Burma all models had adequate fit. Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) determined that the 4-factor “numbing” model was the best fit for the DRC and the 4-factor “dysphoria” model was the best fit for Burma. For Iraq, none of the models had adequate fit. Results support previous research which indicates inconsistency among Western models of PTSD among populations from LMIC. Further research should explore whether this is indicative of the context or potentially other factors.

AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the fit of existing Western posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) models across 3 non-Western low and middle income countries (LMIC). Secondary data analysis was conducted from studies among torture survivors in Northern Iraq, sexual violence survivors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), and Burmese refugees in Thailand. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ) data to compare established Western PTSD models using (a) the 3-factor Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) 4th edition model, (b) the 4-factor “numbing” model, (c) the 4-factor “dysphoria” model, and (d) the 4- factor DSM-5 model. For both the DRC and Burma all models had adequate fit. Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) determined that the 4-factor “numbing” model was the best fit for the DRC and the 4-factor “dysphoria” model was the best fit for Burma. For Iraq, none of the models had adequate fit. Results support previous research which indicates inconsistency among Western models of PTSD among populations from LMIC. Further research should explore whether this is indicative of the context or potentially other factors.

KW - Cross-cultural

KW - Factor analysis

KW - Low- and middle-income country

KW - Posttraumatic stress disorder

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975303446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975303446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/trm0000020

DO - 10.1037/trm0000020

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84975303446

VL - 21

SP - 55

EP - 63

JO - Traumatology

JF - Traumatology

SN - 1534-7656

IS - 2

ER -