Explicit prognostic information and reassurance about nonabandonment when entering palliative breast cancer care: findings from a scripted video-vignette study.

Liesbeth M. van Vliet, Elsken van der Wall, Nicole M. Plum, Jozien M. Bensing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When discussing the transition to palliative care for patients with breast cancer, oncologists have to find a balance between giving explicit information while not overwhelming patients and being realistic while remaining hopeful. It is unclear whether patients prefer more or less explicit prognostic information, and reassuring patients that they will not be abandoned may provide realistic hope. We assessed the effect of explicit prognostic information and reassurance about nonabandonment at the transition to palliative care. An experimental 2 × 2 study was used. Four scripted videos of a bad news conversation were created that differed only in the level of "explicitness of prognosis" and "reassurance about nonabandonment" (high v low). Patients with and survivors of breast cancer (n = 51) and healthy women (n = 53) watched the video-vignettes. The effects of the different communications on participants' anxiety, uncertainty, self-efficacy, and satisfaction were assessed by using multilevel analyses that explored the moderating influences of monitoring/blunting scores. The highly explicit/highly reassuring video yielded the most positive outcomes, and the less explicit/less reassuring video, the most negative (P ≤ .05 for all outcome measures except anxiety). The main effects found were that explicitness and reassurance decreased participants' uncertainty (P <.001 and P = .002, respectively) and anxiety (only after reassurance; P = .001) while increasing self-efficacy (P = .004 and P <.001, respectively) and satisfaction (P <.001 and P <.001, respectively). High monitors seemed least positive, mainly following explicitness. Explicit prognostic information may lead to better outcomes than general information. In addition, reassurance about nonabandonment might provide realistic hope but should be lived up to. More research is needed to translate these findings into clinical care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3242-3249
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume31
Issue number26
StatePublished - Sep 10 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Breast Neoplasms
Hope
Anxiety
Self Efficacy
Palliative Care
Uncertainty
Multilevel Analysis
Survivors
Communication
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Explicit prognostic information and reassurance about nonabandonment when entering palliative breast cancer care : findings from a scripted video-vignette study. / van Vliet, Liesbeth M.; van der Wall, Elsken; Plum, Nicole M.; Bensing, Jozien M.

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol. 31, No. 26, 10.09.2013, p. 3242-3249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

van Vliet, Liesbeth M. ; van der Wall, Elsken ; Plum, Nicole M. ; Bensing, Jozien M. / Explicit prognostic information and reassurance about nonabandonment when entering palliative breast cancer care : findings from a scripted video-vignette study. In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2013 ; Vol. 31, No. 26. pp. 3242-3249.
@article{c5214b79941542d19c984e752a66fdc3,
title = "Explicit prognostic information and reassurance about nonabandonment when entering palliative breast cancer care: findings from a scripted video-vignette study.",
abstract = "When discussing the transition to palliative care for patients with breast cancer, oncologists have to find a balance between giving explicit information while not overwhelming patients and being realistic while remaining hopeful. It is unclear whether patients prefer more or less explicit prognostic information, and reassuring patients that they will not be abandoned may provide realistic hope. We assessed the effect of explicit prognostic information and reassurance about nonabandonment at the transition to palliative care. An experimental 2 × 2 study was used. Four scripted videos of a bad news conversation were created that differed only in the level of {"}explicitness of prognosis{"} and {"}reassurance about nonabandonment{"} (high v low). Patients with and survivors of breast cancer (n = 51) and healthy women (n = 53) watched the video-vignettes. The effects of the different communications on participants' anxiety, uncertainty, self-efficacy, and satisfaction were assessed by using multilevel analyses that explored the moderating influences of monitoring/blunting scores. The highly explicit/highly reassuring video yielded the most positive outcomes, and the less explicit/less reassuring video, the most negative (P ≤ .05 for all outcome measures except anxiety). The main effects found were that explicitness and reassurance decreased participants' uncertainty (P <.001 and P = .002, respectively) and anxiety (only after reassurance; P = .001) while increasing self-efficacy (P = .004 and P <.001, respectively) and satisfaction (P <.001 and P <.001, respectively). High monitors seemed least positive, mainly following explicitness. Explicit prognostic information may lead to better outcomes than general information. In addition, reassurance about nonabandonment might provide realistic hope but should be lived up to. More research is needed to translate these findings into clinical care.",
author = "{van Vliet}, {Liesbeth M.} and {van der Wall}, Elsken and Plum, {Nicole M.} and Bensing, {Jozien M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "3242--3249",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Oncology",
issn = "0732-183X",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",
number = "26",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explicit prognostic information and reassurance about nonabandonment when entering palliative breast cancer care

T2 - findings from a scripted video-vignette study.

AU - van Vliet, Liesbeth M.

AU - van der Wall, Elsken

AU - Plum, Nicole M.

AU - Bensing, Jozien M.

PY - 2013/9/10

Y1 - 2013/9/10

N2 - When discussing the transition to palliative care for patients with breast cancer, oncologists have to find a balance between giving explicit information while not overwhelming patients and being realistic while remaining hopeful. It is unclear whether patients prefer more or less explicit prognostic information, and reassuring patients that they will not be abandoned may provide realistic hope. We assessed the effect of explicit prognostic information and reassurance about nonabandonment at the transition to palliative care. An experimental 2 × 2 study was used. Four scripted videos of a bad news conversation were created that differed only in the level of "explicitness of prognosis" and "reassurance about nonabandonment" (high v low). Patients with and survivors of breast cancer (n = 51) and healthy women (n = 53) watched the video-vignettes. The effects of the different communications on participants' anxiety, uncertainty, self-efficacy, and satisfaction were assessed by using multilevel analyses that explored the moderating influences of monitoring/blunting scores. The highly explicit/highly reassuring video yielded the most positive outcomes, and the less explicit/less reassuring video, the most negative (P ≤ .05 for all outcome measures except anxiety). The main effects found were that explicitness and reassurance decreased participants' uncertainty (P <.001 and P = .002, respectively) and anxiety (only after reassurance; P = .001) while increasing self-efficacy (P = .004 and P <.001, respectively) and satisfaction (P <.001 and P <.001, respectively). High monitors seemed least positive, mainly following explicitness. Explicit prognostic information may lead to better outcomes than general information. In addition, reassurance about nonabandonment might provide realistic hope but should be lived up to. More research is needed to translate these findings into clinical care.

AB - When discussing the transition to palliative care for patients with breast cancer, oncologists have to find a balance between giving explicit information while not overwhelming patients and being realistic while remaining hopeful. It is unclear whether patients prefer more or less explicit prognostic information, and reassuring patients that they will not be abandoned may provide realistic hope. We assessed the effect of explicit prognostic information and reassurance about nonabandonment at the transition to palliative care. An experimental 2 × 2 study was used. Four scripted videos of a bad news conversation were created that differed only in the level of "explicitness of prognosis" and "reassurance about nonabandonment" (high v low). Patients with and survivors of breast cancer (n = 51) and healthy women (n = 53) watched the video-vignettes. The effects of the different communications on participants' anxiety, uncertainty, self-efficacy, and satisfaction were assessed by using multilevel analyses that explored the moderating influences of monitoring/blunting scores. The highly explicit/highly reassuring video yielded the most positive outcomes, and the less explicit/less reassuring video, the most negative (P ≤ .05 for all outcome measures except anxiety). The main effects found were that explicitness and reassurance decreased participants' uncertainty (P <.001 and P = .002, respectively) and anxiety (only after reassurance; P = .001) while increasing self-efficacy (P = .004 and P <.001, respectively) and satisfaction (P <.001 and P <.001, respectively). High monitors seemed least positive, mainly following explicitness. Explicit prognostic information may lead to better outcomes than general information. In addition, reassurance about nonabandonment might provide realistic hope but should be lived up to. More research is needed to translate these findings into clinical care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890275343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890275343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23940230

AN - SCOPUS:84890275343

VL - 31

SP - 3242

EP - 3249

JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology

JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology

SN - 0732-183X

IS - 26

ER -