Explaining Racial Differences in Receipt of Coronary Angiography: The Role of Physician Referral and Physician Specialty

Thomas A. Laveist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authors examine three hypotheses regarding race differences in utilization of coronary angiography (CA): (1) patients with a cardiology consultation are more likely to obtain a referral for CA, (2) African American patients are less likely to have a cardiology consultation, and (3) among patients referred for CA, there is no difference by race in receipt of the procedure. To determine if they obtained a referral for or received CA, 2,623 candidates for CA were followed. Multivariate models were estimated using logistic regression. Cardiology consultation was associated with referral for CA (OR = 5.1,p < .001). White patients had higher odds of cardiology consultation (OR = 2.2,p < .001). The racial disparity was reduced among patients who received a referral (OR = 1.4,p < .05). Researchers must eliminate racial differences in access to specialty care and variation in referral patterns by physician specialty, and efforts must be targeted to those specialties where greater disparities exist.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)453-467
Number of pages15
JournalMedical Care Research and Review
Volume60
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Keywords

  • African American
  • black
  • coronary angiography
  • minority health
  • physician behavior
  • race
  • race disparities
  • referral patterns

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining Racial Differences in Receipt of Coronary Angiography: The Role of Physician Referral and Physician Specialty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this