Abstract
We present our experience with the new Mentor inflatable penile prosthesis for the treatment of organic impotence. Technical complications requiring frequent revision of the most commonly used inflatable prosthesis have led to the development of a new device, which we have used in 116 patients. This hydraulic device provides excellent functional qualities. No connector separations, aneurysms or ruptures have been encountered. Reoperations became necessary in 10.5 per cent of the patients. Cosmetic and functional results were good, and patient acceptance has been excellent.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1181-1182 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Journal of Urology |
Volume | 135 |
Issue number | 6 |
State | Published - 1986 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Urology
Cite this
Experience with the Mentor inflatable penile prosthesis. / Engel, R. M E; Smolev, J. K.; Hackler, R.
In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 135, No. 6, 1986, p. 1181-1182.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Experience with the Mentor inflatable penile prosthesis
AU - Engel, R. M E
AU - Smolev, J. K.
AU - Hackler, R.
PY - 1986
Y1 - 1986
N2 - We present our experience with the new Mentor inflatable penile prosthesis for the treatment of organic impotence. Technical complications requiring frequent revision of the most commonly used inflatable prosthesis have led to the development of a new device, which we have used in 116 patients. This hydraulic device provides excellent functional qualities. No connector separations, aneurysms or ruptures have been encountered. Reoperations became necessary in 10.5 per cent of the patients. Cosmetic and functional results were good, and patient acceptance has been excellent.
AB - We present our experience with the new Mentor inflatable penile prosthesis for the treatment of organic impotence. Technical complications requiring frequent revision of the most commonly used inflatable prosthesis have led to the development of a new device, which we have used in 116 patients. This hydraulic device provides excellent functional qualities. No connector separations, aneurysms or ruptures have been encountered. Reoperations became necessary in 10.5 per cent of the patients. Cosmetic and functional results were good, and patient acceptance has been excellent.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022619624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022619624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 3712565
AN - SCOPUS:0022619624
VL - 135
SP - 1181
EP - 1182
JO - Journal of Urology
JF - Journal of Urology
SN - 0022-5347
IS - 6
ER -