Examining Recidivism in a Prostitution Diversion Program

Erica Koegler, Kathleen M. Preble, Andrea N. Cimino, Jordan E. Stevens, Sue Diehl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Street-based sex work is criminalized throughout much of the U.S. Diversion programs have shown mixed results. This study examined the effect a quasi-experimental intervention (prostitution diversion program, n = 149) had on prostitution rearrest compared with a waitlist control group (n = 77) among N = 226 individuals arrested for prostitution in Baltimore. In both groups, n = 64 (28.32%) were rearrested for prostitution over 30 months. Tests of differences compared groups with a significant difference in gender only. A Cox proportional hazard model examined differences in survival time (to recidivist prostitution arrest) between individuals in the control and intervention groups at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months. Results indicate that participation in the intervention did not have a significant effect on decreasing prostitution arrests over time. History of prior prostitution arrest was a significant predictor (hazard ration [HR] = 1.12, p =.02) of rearrest.Lack of program success suggests that barriers to exiting prostitution are substantial, despite availability of supportive services, and that diversion programs may not be the best intervention strategy for all sex workers. Future research should identify motivators for exiting and how to reduce exiting barriers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)232-248
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
Volume64
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2020

Keywords

  • diversion court
  • prostitution
  • recidivism
  • sex work
  • survival analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Applied Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Examining Recidivism in a Prostitution Diversion Program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this