Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value

Iser G. Deleon, Meagan K. Gregory, Michelle A. Frank-Crawford, Melissa J. Allman, Arthur E. Wilke, Abbey B. Carreau-Webster, Mandy M. Triggs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study examined how the amount of effort required to produce a reinforcer influenced subsequent preference for, and strength of, that reinforcer in 7 individuals with intellectual disabilities. Preference assessments identified four moderately preferred stimuli for each participant, and progressive-ratio (PR) analyses indexed reinforcer strength. Stimuli were then assigned to one of four conditions for 4 weeks: fixed-ratio (FR) 1 schedule, escalating FR schedule, yoked noncontingent (NCR) delivery, and restricted access. Preference assessments and PR schedules were then repeated to examine changes in selection percentages and PR break points. Selection percentages decreased for all NCR stimuli but increased for most of the restricted stimuli. There were no systematic changes in selection percentages for either of the contingent stimuli. Break points increased, on average, for all conditions, but the increase was highest for the restricted stimuli and lowest for the NCR stimuli. These results are discussed in relation to recent basic research addressing the influence of effort on stimulus value.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-558
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

contingency
Appointments and Schedules
stimulus
examination
Values
Intellectual Disability
Research
basic research
Stimulus
Contingency
disability

Keywords

  • noncontingent reinforcement
  • preference assessments
  • progressive-ratio analysis
  • stimulus value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Deleon, I. G., Gregory, M. K., Frank-Crawford, M. A., Allman, M. J., Wilke, A. E., Carreau-Webster, A. B., & Triggs, M. M. (2011). Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(3), 543-558. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-543

Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value. / Deleon, Iser G.; Gregory, Meagan K.; Frank-Crawford, Michelle A.; Allman, Melissa J.; Wilke, Arthur E.; Carreau-Webster, Abbey B.; Triggs, Mandy M.

In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 44, No. 3, 09.2011, p. 543-558.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deleon, IG, Gregory, MK, Frank-Crawford, MA, Allman, MJ, Wilke, AE, Carreau-Webster, AB & Triggs, MM 2011, 'Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value', Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 543-558. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-543
Deleon IG, Gregory MK, Frank-Crawford MA, Allman MJ, Wilke AE, Carreau-Webster AB et al. Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2011 Sep;44(3):543-558. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-543
Deleon, Iser G. ; Gregory, Meagan K. ; Frank-Crawford, Michelle A. ; Allman, Melissa J. ; Wilke, Arthur E. ; Carreau-Webster, Abbey B. ; Triggs, Mandy M. / Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value. In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2011 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 543-558.
@article{ebd103b728ca43778a30cfeba86420cd,
title = "Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value",
abstract = "This study examined how the amount of effort required to produce a reinforcer influenced subsequent preference for, and strength of, that reinforcer in 7 individuals with intellectual disabilities. Preference assessments identified four moderately preferred stimuli for each participant, and progressive-ratio (PR) analyses indexed reinforcer strength. Stimuli were then assigned to one of four conditions for 4 weeks: fixed-ratio (FR) 1 schedule, escalating FR schedule, yoked noncontingent (NCR) delivery, and restricted access. Preference assessments and PR schedules were then repeated to examine changes in selection percentages and PR break points. Selection percentages decreased for all NCR stimuli but increased for most of the restricted stimuli. There were no systematic changes in selection percentages for either of the contingent stimuli. Break points increased, on average, for all conditions, but the increase was highest for the restricted stimuli and lowest for the NCR stimuli. These results are discussed in relation to recent basic research addressing the influence of effort on stimulus value.",
keywords = "noncontingent reinforcement, preference assessments, progressive-ratio analysis, stimulus value",
author = "Deleon, {Iser G.} and Gregory, {Meagan K.} and Frank-Crawford, {Michelle A.} and Allman, {Melissa J.} and Wilke, {Arthur E.} and Carreau-Webster, {Abbey B.} and Triggs, {Mandy M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1901/jaba.2011.44-543",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "543--558",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value

AU - Deleon, Iser G.

AU - Gregory, Meagan K.

AU - Frank-Crawford, Michelle A.

AU - Allman, Melissa J.

AU - Wilke, Arthur E.

AU - Carreau-Webster, Abbey B.

AU - Triggs, Mandy M.

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - This study examined how the amount of effort required to produce a reinforcer influenced subsequent preference for, and strength of, that reinforcer in 7 individuals with intellectual disabilities. Preference assessments identified four moderately preferred stimuli for each participant, and progressive-ratio (PR) analyses indexed reinforcer strength. Stimuli were then assigned to one of four conditions for 4 weeks: fixed-ratio (FR) 1 schedule, escalating FR schedule, yoked noncontingent (NCR) delivery, and restricted access. Preference assessments and PR schedules were then repeated to examine changes in selection percentages and PR break points. Selection percentages decreased for all NCR stimuli but increased for most of the restricted stimuli. There were no systematic changes in selection percentages for either of the contingent stimuli. Break points increased, on average, for all conditions, but the increase was highest for the restricted stimuli and lowest for the NCR stimuli. These results are discussed in relation to recent basic research addressing the influence of effort on stimulus value.

AB - This study examined how the amount of effort required to produce a reinforcer influenced subsequent preference for, and strength of, that reinforcer in 7 individuals with intellectual disabilities. Preference assessments identified four moderately preferred stimuli for each participant, and progressive-ratio (PR) analyses indexed reinforcer strength. Stimuli were then assigned to one of four conditions for 4 weeks: fixed-ratio (FR) 1 schedule, escalating FR schedule, yoked noncontingent (NCR) delivery, and restricted access. Preference assessments and PR schedules were then repeated to examine changes in selection percentages and PR break points. Selection percentages decreased for all NCR stimuli but increased for most of the restricted stimuli. There were no systematic changes in selection percentages for either of the contingent stimuli. Break points increased, on average, for all conditions, but the increase was highest for the restricted stimuli and lowest for the NCR stimuli. These results are discussed in relation to recent basic research addressing the influence of effort on stimulus value.

KW - noncontingent reinforcement

KW - preference assessments

KW - progressive-ratio analysis

KW - stimulus value

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856195484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856195484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-543

DO - 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-543

M3 - Article

C2 - 21941384

AN - SCOPUS:84856195484

VL - 44

SP - 543

EP - 558

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 3

ER -