TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence from household surveys for measuring coverage of newborn care practices
AU - Sitrin, Deborah
AU - Perin, Jamie
AU - Vaz, Lara M.E.
AU - Carvajal-Aguirre, Liliana
AU - Khan, Shane M.
AU - Fishel, Joy
AU - Amouzou, Agbessi
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements: The authors acknowledge the contribution of Vrinda Mehra And Liliana Car-vajal in leading the supplement in which this paper is appearing. Disclaimers: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the respective organizations. Funding: Save the Children's Saving Newborn Lives program funded this work. Authorship contributions: DS, JF, AA conceptualized the study. DS reviewed DHS reports for the descriptive analysis. JP conducted quantitative data analysis. DS, JP, LV, LC, SK, AA participated in a workshop to review and interpret preliminary results. DS and JP prepared a first draft of the paper. All authors contributed to subsequent drafts and approved the final version.
PY - 2017/12/20
Y1 - 2017/12/20
N2 - Background Aside from breastfeeding, there are little data on use of essential newborn care practices, such as thermal protection and hygienic cord care, in high mortality countries. These practices have not typically been measured in national household surveys, often the main source for coverage data in these settings. The Every Newborn Action Plan proposed early breastfeeding as a tracer for essential newborn care due to data availability and evidence for the benefits of breastfeeding. In the past decade, a few national surveys have added questions on other practices, presenting an opportunity to assess the performance of early breastfeeding initiation as a tracer indicator. Methods We identified twelve national surveys between 2005-2014 that included at least one indicator for immediate newborn care in addition to breastfeeding. Because question wording and reference populations varied, we standardized data to the extent possible to estimate coverage of newborn care practices, accounting for strata and multistage survey design. We assessed early breastfeeding as a tracer by: 1) examining associations with other indicators using Pearson correlations; and 2) stratifying by early breastfeeding to determine differences in coverage of other practices for initiators vs non-initiators in each survey, then pooling across surveys for a meta-analysis, using the inverse standard error as the weight for each observation. Findings Associations between pairs of coverage indicators are generally weak, including those with breastfeeding. The exception is drying and wrapping, which have the strongest association of any two interventions in all five surveys where measured; estimated correlations for this range from 0.47 in Bangladesh's 2007 DHS to 0.83 in Nepal's 2006 DHS. The contrast in coverage for other practices by early breastfeeding is generally small; the greatest absolute difference was 6.7%, between coverage of immediate drying for newborns breastfed early compared to those who were not. Conclusions Early initiation of breastfeeding is not a high performing tracer indicator for essential newborn care practices measured in previous national surveys. To have informative data on whether newborns are getting life-saving services, standardized questions about specific practices, in addition to breastfeeding initiation, need to be added to surveys.
AB - Background Aside from breastfeeding, there are little data on use of essential newborn care practices, such as thermal protection and hygienic cord care, in high mortality countries. These practices have not typically been measured in national household surveys, often the main source for coverage data in these settings. The Every Newborn Action Plan proposed early breastfeeding as a tracer for essential newborn care due to data availability and evidence for the benefits of breastfeeding. In the past decade, a few national surveys have added questions on other practices, presenting an opportunity to assess the performance of early breastfeeding initiation as a tracer indicator. Methods We identified twelve national surveys between 2005-2014 that included at least one indicator for immediate newborn care in addition to breastfeeding. Because question wording and reference populations varied, we standardized data to the extent possible to estimate coverage of newborn care practices, accounting for strata and multistage survey design. We assessed early breastfeeding as a tracer by: 1) examining associations with other indicators using Pearson correlations; and 2) stratifying by early breastfeeding to determine differences in coverage of other practices for initiators vs non-initiators in each survey, then pooling across surveys for a meta-analysis, using the inverse standard error as the weight for each observation. Findings Associations between pairs of coverage indicators are generally weak, including those with breastfeeding. The exception is drying and wrapping, which have the strongest association of any two interventions in all five surveys where measured; estimated correlations for this range from 0.47 in Bangladesh's 2007 DHS to 0.83 in Nepal's 2006 DHS. The contrast in coverage for other practices by early breastfeeding is generally small; the greatest absolute difference was 6.7%, between coverage of immediate drying for newborns breastfed early compared to those who were not. Conclusions Early initiation of breastfeeding is not a high performing tracer indicator for essential newborn care practices measured in previous national surveys. To have informative data on whether newborns are getting life-saving services, standardized questions about specific practices, in addition to breastfeeding initiation, need to be added to surveys.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039045067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039045067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7189/jogh.07.020503
DO - 10.7189/jogh.07.020503
M3 - Article
C2 - 29423180
AN - SCOPUS:85039045067
SN - 2047-2978
VL - 7
JO - Journal of Global Health
JF - Journal of Global Health
IS - 2
M1 - 020503
ER -