Evidence and Practicalities of Aqueous Sublingual Immunotherapy, Tablet Sublingual Immunotherapy, and Oral Mucosal Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis and Allergic Asthma

Christopher R. Roxbury, Sandra Y. Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment for allergic rhinitis (AR). Multiple modalities of AIT dosed via sublingual or oral routes are becoming available. This review discusses current evidence and practicalities of aqueous and tablet sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) and oral mucosal immunotherapy (OMIT) in the treatment of AR and allergic asthma. Recent Findings: Several large-scale studies demonstrate the efficacy and safety of SLIT. These studies have led to the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) approval of tablet SLIT against grass, ragweed, and house dust mites (HDM). However, off-label use of aqueous SLIT is still practiced as a safe and effective alternative in polysensitized patients. Growing evidence suggests a role for SLIT in patients with allergic asthma. Summary: The literature supports the efficacy and safety of aqueous and tablet SLIT for AR, while some controversy remains over the utility of SLIT for allergic asthma. OMIT is currently in the early stages of development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-13
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Otorhinolaryngology Reports
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2020

Keywords

  • Allergen immunotherapy
  • Allergic asthma
  • Allergic rhinitis
  • Oral mucosal immunotherapy
  • Sublingual immunotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence and Practicalities of Aqueous Sublingual Immunotherapy, Tablet Sublingual Immunotherapy, and Oral Mucosal Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis and Allergic Asthma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this