Evaluation of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) in children with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

C. Calhoun Thielen, C. Sadowsky, L. C. Vogel, H. Taylor, L. Davidson, J. Bultman, J. Gaughan, M. J. Mulcahey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study Design:Mixed methods were used in this study. The appropriateness of the levels of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) for application in children was critically reviewed by physical therapists using the Modified Delphi Technique, and the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the WISCI-II in children was evaluated.Objectives:To examine the construct validity, and to establish reliability of the WISCI-II related to its use in children with spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:United States of America.Methods:Using a Modified Delphi Technique, physical therapists critically reviewed the WISCI-II levels for pediatric utilization. Concurrently, ambulatory children under age 18 years with SCI were evaluated using the WISCI-II on two occasions by the same therapist to establish intra-rater reliability. One trial was photographed and de-identified. Each photograph was reviewed by four different physical therapists who gave WISCI-II scores to establish inter-rater reliability. Summary and descriptive statistics were used to calculate the frequency of yes/no responses for each WISCI-II level question and to determine the percent agreement for each question. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was calculated using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results:Construct validity was confirmed after one Delphi round during which at least 80% agreement was established by 51 physical therapists on the appropriateness of the WISCI-II levels for children. Fifty-two children with SCI aged 2–17 years completed repeated WISCI-II assessments and 40 de-identified photographs were scored by four physical therapists. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was high (ICC=0.997, CI=0.995–0.998 and ICC=0.97, CI=0.95–0.98, respectively).Conclusion:This study demonstrates support for the use of the WISCI-II in ambulatory children with SCI.Sponsorship:This study was funded by the Craig H Neilsen Foundation, Spinal Cord Injury Research on the Translation Spectrum, Senior Research Award #282592 (Mulcahey, PI).Spinal Cord advance online publication, 18 October 2016; doi:10.1038/sc.2016.142.

LanguageEnglish (US)
JournalSpinal Cord
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 18 2016

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Injuries
Walking
Physical Therapists
Delphi Technique
Confidence Intervals
Research
Reproducibility of Results
Publications
Spinal Cord

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Calhoun Thielen, C., Sadowsky, C., Vogel, L. C., Taylor, H., Davidson, L., Bultman, J., ... Mulcahey, M. J. (Accepted/In press). Evaluation of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) in children with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Spinal Cord. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2016.142

Evaluation of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) in children with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). / Calhoun Thielen, C.; Sadowsky, C.; Vogel, L. C.; Taylor, H.; Davidson, L.; Bultman, J.; Gaughan, J.; Mulcahey, M. J.

In: Spinal Cord, 18.10.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Calhoun Thielen, C, Sadowsky, C, Vogel, LC, Taylor, H, Davidson, L, Bultman, J, Gaughan, J & Mulcahey, MJ 2016, 'Evaluation of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) in children with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)' Spinal Cord. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2016.142
Calhoun Thielen C, Sadowsky C, Vogel LC, Taylor H, Davidson L, Bultman J et al. Evaluation of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) in children with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Spinal Cord. 2016 Oct 18. Available from, DOI: 10.1038/sc.2016.142
Calhoun Thielen, C. ; Sadowsky, C. ; Vogel, L. C. ; Taylor, H. ; Davidson, L. ; Bultman, J. ; Gaughan, J. ; Mulcahey, M. J./ Evaluation of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) in children with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). In: Spinal Cord. 2016
@article{9af71f021dce423eaedfea2da6d768ff,
title = "Evaluation of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) in children with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)",
abstract = "Study Design:Mixed methods were used in this study. The appropriateness of the levels of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) for application in children was critically reviewed by physical therapists using the Modified Delphi Technique, and the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the WISCI-II in children was evaluated.Objectives:To examine the construct validity, and to establish reliability of the WISCI-II related to its use in children with spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:United States of America.Methods:Using a Modified Delphi Technique, physical therapists critically reviewed the WISCI-II levels for pediatric utilization. Concurrently, ambulatory children under age 18 years with SCI were evaluated using the WISCI-II on two occasions by the same therapist to establish intra-rater reliability. One trial was photographed and de-identified. Each photograph was reviewed by four different physical therapists who gave WISCI-II scores to establish inter-rater reliability. Summary and descriptive statistics were used to calculate the frequency of yes/no responses for each WISCI-II level question and to determine the percent agreement for each question. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was calculated using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95{\%} confidence intervals (CI).Results:Construct validity was confirmed after one Delphi round during which at least 80{\%} agreement was established by 51 physical therapists on the appropriateness of the WISCI-II levels for children. Fifty-two children with SCI aged 2–17 years completed repeated WISCI-II assessments and 40 de-identified photographs were scored by four physical therapists. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was high (ICC=0.997, CI=0.995–0.998 and ICC=0.97, CI=0.95–0.98, respectively).Conclusion:This study demonstrates support for the use of the WISCI-II in ambulatory children with SCI.Sponsorship:This study was funded by the Craig H Neilsen Foundation, Spinal Cord Injury Research on the Translation Spectrum, Senior Research Award #282592 (Mulcahey, PI).Spinal Cord advance online publication, 18 October 2016; doi:10.1038/sc.2016.142.",
author = "{Calhoun Thielen}, C. and C. Sadowsky and Vogel, {L. C.} and H. Taylor and L. Davidson and J. Bultman and J. Gaughan and Mulcahey, {M. J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1038/sc.2016.142",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Spinal Cord",
issn = "1362-4393",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) in children with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)

AU - Calhoun Thielen,C.

AU - Sadowsky,C.

AU - Vogel,L. C.

AU - Taylor,H.

AU - Davidson,L.

AU - Bultman,J.

AU - Gaughan,J.

AU - Mulcahey,M. J.

PY - 2016/10/18

Y1 - 2016/10/18

N2 - Study Design:Mixed methods were used in this study. The appropriateness of the levels of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) for application in children was critically reviewed by physical therapists using the Modified Delphi Technique, and the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the WISCI-II in children was evaluated.Objectives:To examine the construct validity, and to establish reliability of the WISCI-II related to its use in children with spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:United States of America.Methods:Using a Modified Delphi Technique, physical therapists critically reviewed the WISCI-II levels for pediatric utilization. Concurrently, ambulatory children under age 18 years with SCI were evaluated using the WISCI-II on two occasions by the same therapist to establish intra-rater reliability. One trial was photographed and de-identified. Each photograph was reviewed by four different physical therapists who gave WISCI-II scores to establish inter-rater reliability. Summary and descriptive statistics were used to calculate the frequency of yes/no responses for each WISCI-II level question and to determine the percent agreement for each question. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was calculated using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results:Construct validity was confirmed after one Delphi round during which at least 80% agreement was established by 51 physical therapists on the appropriateness of the WISCI-II levels for children. Fifty-two children with SCI aged 2–17 years completed repeated WISCI-II assessments and 40 de-identified photographs were scored by four physical therapists. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was high (ICC=0.997, CI=0.995–0.998 and ICC=0.97, CI=0.95–0.98, respectively).Conclusion:This study demonstrates support for the use of the WISCI-II in ambulatory children with SCI.Sponsorship:This study was funded by the Craig H Neilsen Foundation, Spinal Cord Injury Research on the Translation Spectrum, Senior Research Award #282592 (Mulcahey, PI).Spinal Cord advance online publication, 18 October 2016; doi:10.1038/sc.2016.142.

AB - Study Design:Mixed methods were used in this study. The appropriateness of the levels of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II) for application in children was critically reviewed by physical therapists using the Modified Delphi Technique, and the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the WISCI-II in children was evaluated.Objectives:To examine the construct validity, and to establish reliability of the WISCI-II related to its use in children with spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting:United States of America.Methods:Using a Modified Delphi Technique, physical therapists critically reviewed the WISCI-II levels for pediatric utilization. Concurrently, ambulatory children under age 18 years with SCI were evaluated using the WISCI-II on two occasions by the same therapist to establish intra-rater reliability. One trial was photographed and de-identified. Each photograph was reviewed by four different physical therapists who gave WISCI-II scores to establish inter-rater reliability. Summary and descriptive statistics were used to calculate the frequency of yes/no responses for each WISCI-II level question and to determine the percent agreement for each question. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was calculated using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results:Construct validity was confirmed after one Delphi round during which at least 80% agreement was established by 51 physical therapists on the appropriateness of the WISCI-II levels for children. Fifty-two children with SCI aged 2–17 years completed repeated WISCI-II assessments and 40 de-identified photographs were scored by four physical therapists. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was high (ICC=0.997, CI=0.995–0.998 and ICC=0.97, CI=0.95–0.98, respectively).Conclusion:This study demonstrates support for the use of the WISCI-II in ambulatory children with SCI.Sponsorship:This study was funded by the Craig H Neilsen Foundation, Spinal Cord Injury Research on the Translation Spectrum, Senior Research Award #282592 (Mulcahey, PI).Spinal Cord advance online publication, 18 October 2016; doi:10.1038/sc.2016.142.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991661556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991661556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sc.2016.142

DO - 10.1038/sc.2016.142

M3 - Article

JO - Spinal Cord

T2 - Spinal Cord

JF - Spinal Cord

SN - 1362-4393

ER -