Evaluation of the "control over reinforcement" component in functional communication training

Sung Woo Kahng, Brian A. Iwata, Iser G. DeLeon, April S. Worsdell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The effectiveness of functional communication training (FCT) as a treatment for behavior disorders has been attributed to a number of variables, one of which is the individual's ability to exert control over the delivery of reinforcement. We evaluated this component of FCT by exposing individuals to conditions in which their behavior either did or did not affect the delivery of reinforcement. Three adults with mental retardation who engaged in self-injurious behavior (SIB) participated. Following a functional analysis of their SIB, the effects of FCT were compared to those of noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) in a multielement design. The amount of reinforcement during both conditions was equated by yoking the schedule of reinforcement during NCR sessions to that in effect during FCT sessions. Results indicated that FCT and NCR were equally effective in reducing the SIB of all participants and suggest that control over reinforcement delivery may not affect the degree to which FCT produces behavioral suppression. However, a different benefit of FCT was evident in the results: More consistent increases in the alternative response were observed during the FCT condition than during the NCR condition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-277
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Volume30
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

reinforcement
Communication
communication
evaluation
Self-Injurious Behavior
behavioral training
Reinforcement Schedule
Aptitude
behavior disorder
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Communication Training
Evaluation
Functional Communication
Reinforcement
functional analysis
Mental Disorders
Intellectual Disability
suppression
ability

Keywords

  • Extinction
  • Functional analysis
  • Functional communication training
  • Noncontingent reinforcement
  • Self-injurious behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Kahng, S. W., Iwata, B. A., DeLeon, I. G., & Worsdell, A. S. (1997). Evaluation of the "control over reinforcement" component in functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(2), 267-277.

Evaluation of the "control over reinforcement" component in functional communication training. / Kahng, Sung Woo; Iwata, Brian A.; DeLeon, Iser G.; Worsdell, April S.

In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 30, No. 2, 06.1997, p. 267-277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kahng, SW, Iwata, BA, DeLeon, IG & Worsdell, AS 1997, 'Evaluation of the "control over reinforcement" component in functional communication training', Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 267-277.
Kahng, Sung Woo ; Iwata, Brian A. ; DeLeon, Iser G. ; Worsdell, April S. / Evaluation of the "control over reinforcement" component in functional communication training. In: Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1997 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 267-277.
@article{b0e54ddd2cce4ea9842c28829485afb0,
title = "Evaluation of the {"}control over reinforcement{"} component in functional communication training",
abstract = "The effectiveness of functional communication training (FCT) as a treatment for behavior disorders has been attributed to a number of variables, one of which is the individual's ability to exert control over the delivery of reinforcement. We evaluated this component of FCT by exposing individuals to conditions in which their behavior either did or did not affect the delivery of reinforcement. Three adults with mental retardation who engaged in self-injurious behavior (SIB) participated. Following a functional analysis of their SIB, the effects of FCT were compared to those of noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) in a multielement design. The amount of reinforcement during both conditions was equated by yoking the schedule of reinforcement during NCR sessions to that in effect during FCT sessions. Results indicated that FCT and NCR were equally effective in reducing the SIB of all participants and suggest that control over reinforcement delivery may not affect the degree to which FCT produces behavioral suppression. However, a different benefit of FCT was evident in the results: More consistent increases in the alternative response were observed during the FCT condition than during the NCR condition.",
keywords = "Extinction, Functional analysis, Functional communication training, Noncontingent reinforcement, Self-injurious behavior",
author = "Kahng, {Sung Woo} and Iwata, {Brian A.} and DeLeon, {Iser G.} and Worsdell, {April S.}",
year = "1997",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "267--277",
journal = "Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis",
issn = "0021-8855",
publisher = "Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the "control over reinforcement" component in functional communication training

AU - Kahng, Sung Woo

AU - Iwata, Brian A.

AU - DeLeon, Iser G.

AU - Worsdell, April S.

PY - 1997/6

Y1 - 1997/6

N2 - The effectiveness of functional communication training (FCT) as a treatment for behavior disorders has been attributed to a number of variables, one of which is the individual's ability to exert control over the delivery of reinforcement. We evaluated this component of FCT by exposing individuals to conditions in which their behavior either did or did not affect the delivery of reinforcement. Three adults with mental retardation who engaged in self-injurious behavior (SIB) participated. Following a functional analysis of their SIB, the effects of FCT were compared to those of noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) in a multielement design. The amount of reinforcement during both conditions was equated by yoking the schedule of reinforcement during NCR sessions to that in effect during FCT sessions. Results indicated that FCT and NCR were equally effective in reducing the SIB of all participants and suggest that control over reinforcement delivery may not affect the degree to which FCT produces behavioral suppression. However, a different benefit of FCT was evident in the results: More consistent increases in the alternative response were observed during the FCT condition than during the NCR condition.

AB - The effectiveness of functional communication training (FCT) as a treatment for behavior disorders has been attributed to a number of variables, one of which is the individual's ability to exert control over the delivery of reinforcement. We evaluated this component of FCT by exposing individuals to conditions in which their behavior either did or did not affect the delivery of reinforcement. Three adults with mental retardation who engaged in self-injurious behavior (SIB) participated. Following a functional analysis of their SIB, the effects of FCT were compared to those of noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) in a multielement design. The amount of reinforcement during both conditions was equated by yoking the schedule of reinforcement during NCR sessions to that in effect during FCT sessions. Results indicated that FCT and NCR were equally effective in reducing the SIB of all participants and suggest that control over reinforcement delivery may not affect the degree to which FCT produces behavioral suppression. However, a different benefit of FCT was evident in the results: More consistent increases in the alternative response were observed during the FCT condition than during the NCR condition.

KW - Extinction

KW - Functional analysis

KW - Functional communication training

KW - Noncontingent reinforcement

KW - Self-injurious behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031158431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031158431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9210306

AN - SCOPUS:0031158431

VL - 30

SP - 267

EP - 277

JO - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

JF - Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

SN - 0021-8855

IS - 2

ER -