Evaluation of semi-automatic arterial stenosis quantification

Marcela Hernández Hoyos, Jean Michel Serfaty, Albinka Maghiar, Catherine Mansard, Maciej Orkisz, Isabelle E. Magnin, Philippe C. Douek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Object: To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of semi-automatic vessel axis extraction and stenosis quantification in 3D contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography (CE-MRA) of the carotid arteries (CA). Materials and methods: A total of 25 MRA datasets was used: 5 phantoms with known stenoses, and 20 patients (40 CAs) drawn from a multicenter trial database. Maracas software extracted vessel centerlines and quantified the stenoses, based on boundary detection in planes perpendicular to the centerline. Centerline accuracy was visually scored. Semi-automatic measurements were compared with: (1) theoretical phantom morphometric values, and (2) stenosis degrees evaluated by two independent radiologists. Results: Exploitable centerlines were obtained in 97% of CA and in all phantoms. In phantoms, the software achieved a better agreement with theoretic stenosis degrees (weighted kappa κ w = 0.91) than the radiologists (κ w = 0.69). In patients, agreement between software and radiologists varied from κ w =0.67 to 0.90. In both, Maracas was substantially more reproducible than the readers. Mean operating time was within 1 min/ CA. Conclusion: Maracas software generates accurate 3D centerlines of vascular segments with minimum user intervention. Semi-automatic quantification of CA stenosis is also accurate, except in very severe stenoses that cannot be segmented. It substantially reduces the inter-observer variability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)167-175
Number of pages9
JournalInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Angiography
Magnetic resonance
Pathologic Constriction
Software
Carotid Arteries
Observer Variation
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Carotid Stenosis
Multicenter Studies
Blood Vessels
Databases
Radiologists

Keywords

  • Carotid artery stenosis
  • Computer assisted image processing
  • Magnetic resonance angiography
  • Three-dimensional image
  • Vascular diseases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Hoyos, M. H., Serfaty, J. M., Maghiar, A., Mansard, C., Orkisz, M., Magnin, I. E., & Douek, P. C. (2006). Evaluation of semi-automatic arterial stenosis quantification. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 1(3), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-006-0049-1

Evaluation of semi-automatic arterial stenosis quantification. / Hoyos, Marcela Hernández; Serfaty, Jean Michel; Maghiar, Albinka; Mansard, Catherine; Orkisz, Maciej; Magnin, Isabelle E.; Douek, Philippe C.

In: International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, Vol. 1, No. 3, 11.2006, p. 167-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hoyos, MH, Serfaty, JM, Maghiar, A, Mansard, C, Orkisz, M, Magnin, IE & Douek, PC 2006, 'Evaluation of semi-automatic arterial stenosis quantification', International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-006-0049-1
Hoyos, Marcela Hernández ; Serfaty, Jean Michel ; Maghiar, Albinka ; Mansard, Catherine ; Orkisz, Maciej ; Magnin, Isabelle E. ; Douek, Philippe C. / Evaluation of semi-automatic arterial stenosis quantification. In: International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 167-175.
@article{4d570530282f4b46bfaed99f51b61c31,
title = "Evaluation of semi-automatic arterial stenosis quantification",
abstract = "Object: To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of semi-automatic vessel axis extraction and stenosis quantification in 3D contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography (CE-MRA) of the carotid arteries (CA). Materials and methods: A total of 25 MRA datasets was used: 5 phantoms with known stenoses, and 20 patients (40 CAs) drawn from a multicenter trial database. Maracas software extracted vessel centerlines and quantified the stenoses, based on boundary detection in planes perpendicular to the centerline. Centerline accuracy was visually scored. Semi-automatic measurements were compared with: (1) theoretical phantom morphometric values, and (2) stenosis degrees evaluated by two independent radiologists. Results: Exploitable centerlines were obtained in 97{\%} of CA and in all phantoms. In phantoms, the software achieved a better agreement with theoretic stenosis degrees (weighted kappa κ w = 0.91) than the radiologists (κ w = 0.69). In patients, agreement between software and radiologists varied from κ w =0.67 to 0.90. In both, Maracas was substantially more reproducible than the readers. Mean operating time was within 1 min/ CA. Conclusion: Maracas software generates accurate 3D centerlines of vascular segments with minimum user intervention. Semi-automatic quantification of CA stenosis is also accurate, except in very severe stenoses that cannot be segmented. It substantially reduces the inter-observer variability.",
keywords = "Carotid artery stenosis, Computer assisted image processing, Magnetic resonance angiography, Three-dimensional image, Vascular diseases",
author = "Hoyos, {Marcela Hern{\'a}ndez} and Serfaty, {Jean Michel} and Albinka Maghiar and Catherine Mansard and Maciej Orkisz and Magnin, {Isabelle E.} and Douek, {Philippe C.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s11548-006-0049-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "167--175",
journal = "Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery",
issn = "1861-6410",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of semi-automatic arterial stenosis quantification

AU - Hoyos, Marcela Hernández

AU - Serfaty, Jean Michel

AU - Maghiar, Albinka

AU - Mansard, Catherine

AU - Orkisz, Maciej

AU - Magnin, Isabelle E.

AU - Douek, Philippe C.

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Object: To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of semi-automatic vessel axis extraction and stenosis quantification in 3D contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography (CE-MRA) of the carotid arteries (CA). Materials and methods: A total of 25 MRA datasets was used: 5 phantoms with known stenoses, and 20 patients (40 CAs) drawn from a multicenter trial database. Maracas software extracted vessel centerlines and quantified the stenoses, based on boundary detection in planes perpendicular to the centerline. Centerline accuracy was visually scored. Semi-automatic measurements were compared with: (1) theoretical phantom morphometric values, and (2) stenosis degrees evaluated by two independent radiologists. Results: Exploitable centerlines were obtained in 97% of CA and in all phantoms. In phantoms, the software achieved a better agreement with theoretic stenosis degrees (weighted kappa κ w = 0.91) than the radiologists (κ w = 0.69). In patients, agreement between software and radiologists varied from κ w =0.67 to 0.90. In both, Maracas was substantially more reproducible than the readers. Mean operating time was within 1 min/ CA. Conclusion: Maracas software generates accurate 3D centerlines of vascular segments with minimum user intervention. Semi-automatic quantification of CA stenosis is also accurate, except in very severe stenoses that cannot be segmented. It substantially reduces the inter-observer variability.

AB - Object: To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of semi-automatic vessel axis extraction and stenosis quantification in 3D contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography (CE-MRA) of the carotid arteries (CA). Materials and methods: A total of 25 MRA datasets was used: 5 phantoms with known stenoses, and 20 patients (40 CAs) drawn from a multicenter trial database. Maracas software extracted vessel centerlines and quantified the stenoses, based on boundary detection in planes perpendicular to the centerline. Centerline accuracy was visually scored. Semi-automatic measurements were compared with: (1) theoretical phantom morphometric values, and (2) stenosis degrees evaluated by two independent radiologists. Results: Exploitable centerlines were obtained in 97% of CA and in all phantoms. In phantoms, the software achieved a better agreement with theoretic stenosis degrees (weighted kappa κ w = 0.91) than the radiologists (κ w = 0.69). In patients, agreement between software and radiologists varied from κ w =0.67 to 0.90. In both, Maracas was substantially more reproducible than the readers. Mean operating time was within 1 min/ CA. Conclusion: Maracas software generates accurate 3D centerlines of vascular segments with minimum user intervention. Semi-automatic quantification of CA stenosis is also accurate, except in very severe stenoses that cannot be segmented. It substantially reduces the inter-observer variability.

KW - Carotid artery stenosis

KW - Computer assisted image processing

KW - Magnetic resonance angiography

KW - Three-dimensional image

KW - Vascular diseases

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751438301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751438301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11548-006-0049-1

DO - 10.1007/s11548-006-0049-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33751438301

VL - 1

SP - 167

EP - 175

JO - Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery

JF - Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery

SN - 1861-6410

IS - 3

ER -