Evaluation of paradoxical TB-associated IRIS with the use of standardized case definitions for resource-limited settings

Ingrid Eshun-Wilson, Fiona Havers, Jean B. Nachega, Hans W. Prozesky, Jantjie J. Taljaard, Michele D. Zeier, Mark Cotton, Gary Simon, Patrick Soentjens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Standardized case definitions have recently been proposed by the International Network for the Study of HIV-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (INSHI; [IRIS]) for use in resource-limited settings. We evaluated paradoxical tuberculosis (TB)-associated IRIS in a large cohort from a TB endemic setting with the use of these case definitions. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Method: We reviewed records from 1250 South African patients who initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) over a 5-year period. Results: A total of 333 (27%) of the patients in the cohort had prevalent TB at the initiation of ART. Of 54 possible paradoxical TB-associated IRIS cases, 35 fulfilled the INSHI case definitions (11% of TB cases). Conclusions: INSHI-standardized case definitions were used successfully in identifying paradoxical TB-associated IRIS in this cohort and resulted in a similar proportion of TB IRIS cases ( %) as that reported in previous studies from resource-limited settings (8%-l3%). This case definition should be evaluated prospectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-108
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Keywords

  • HIV
  • INSHI
  • Immune reconstitution
  • Resource-limited settings
  • Tuberculosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology
  • Dermatology
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of paradoxical TB-associated IRIS with the use of standardized case definitions for resource-limited settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this