Evaluation of environmental cleaning of patient rooms

Impact of different fluorescent gel markers

Clare Rock, Anping Xie, Jennifer Andonian, Yea-Jen Hsu, Patience Osei, Sara Keller, Ayse Gurses, Polly Trexler, Lisa Maragakis, Sara Cosgrove

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this systematic evaluation of fluorescent gel markers (FGM) applied to high-touch surfaces with a metered applicator (MA) made for the purpose versus a generic cotton swab (CS), removal rates were 60.5% (476 of 787) for the MA and 64.3% (506 of 787) for the CS. MA-FGM removal interpretation was more consistent, 83% versus 50% not removed, possibly due to less varied application and more adhesive gel.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Patients' Rooms
Gels
Touch
Adhesives

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

@article{05df5424659d4a5d92c88087bf3eafad,
title = "Evaluation of environmental cleaning of patient rooms: Impact of different fluorescent gel markers",
abstract = "In this systematic evaluation of fluorescent gel markers (FGM) applied to high-touch surfaces with a metered applicator (MA) made for the purpose versus a generic cotton swab (CS), removal rates were 60.5{\%} (476 of 787) for the MA and 64.3{\%} (506 of 787) for the CS. MA-FGM removal interpretation was more consistent, 83{\%} versus 50{\%} not removed, possibly due to less varied application and more adhesive gel.",
author = "Clare Rock and Anping Xie and Jennifer Andonian and Yea-Jen Hsu and Patience Osei and Sara Keller and Ayse Gurses and Polly Trexler and Lisa Maragakis and Sara Cosgrove",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/ice.2018.287",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology",
issn = "0899-823X",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of environmental cleaning of patient rooms

T2 - Impact of different fluorescent gel markers

AU - Rock, Clare

AU - Xie, Anping

AU - Andonian, Jennifer

AU - Hsu, Yea-Jen

AU - Osei, Patience

AU - Keller, Sara

AU - Gurses, Ayse

AU - Trexler, Polly

AU - Maragakis, Lisa

AU - Cosgrove, Sara

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In this systematic evaluation of fluorescent gel markers (FGM) applied to high-touch surfaces with a metered applicator (MA) made for the purpose versus a generic cotton swab (CS), removal rates were 60.5% (476 of 787) for the MA and 64.3% (506 of 787) for the CS. MA-FGM removal interpretation was more consistent, 83% versus 50% not removed, possibly due to less varied application and more adhesive gel.

AB - In this systematic evaluation of fluorescent gel markers (FGM) applied to high-touch surfaces with a metered applicator (MA) made for the purpose versus a generic cotton swab (CS), removal rates were 60.5% (476 of 787) for the MA and 64.3% (506 of 787) for the CS. MA-FGM removal interpretation was more consistent, 83% versus 50% not removed, possibly due to less varied application and more adhesive gel.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056641335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056641335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/ice.2018.287

DO - 10.1017/ice.2018.287

M3 - Article

JO - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

JF - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

SN - 0899-823X

ER -