Evaluation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease print patient education materials for use with low-health literate populations

Felicia Hill-Briggs, Andrea S. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE-Populations with the lowest literacy and health literacy in the U.S. are also among those disproportionately burdened by diabetes and its complications. Yet, suitability of publicly available diabetes and cardiovascular (CVD) patient education materials for these patients is not clear. We evaluated selected American Diabetes Association (ADA) and American Heart Association (AHA) print education materials for accessibility and usability characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-English-language, print patient education brochures addressing lifestyle/behavioral management of diabetes and CVD were obtained from the ADA (n = 21) and the AHA (n = 19). Materials were evaluated using 32 criteria, 23 addressing literacy demand and 9 addressing behavioral activation, compiled from authoritative sources on development of low-literacy consumer health information. RESULTS-Of the 32 criteria identified by two or more sources, ADA materials consistently met 11 (34%) and AHA materials consistently met 8 (25%). Criteria most frequently achieved were text case, use of cues (e.g., bullets) to emphasize key points, design of graphics/illustrations, some provision of "how to" information, and positive depiction of cultural images. The least consistently achieved criteria were reading grade, word usage (e.g., scientific jargon), sentence length, font size, line length, white space, visual organization, limited scope, clear and specific (e.g., step-by-step) behavioral recommendations, and demonstration of audience relevance and cultural appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS-Materials consistently met few criteria for usability by patients with low literacy, limited prior medical knowledge, and/or limited resource availability. Use of available criteria and methods for increasing reach of print education materials to these underserved patient populations is indicated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)667-671
Number of pages5
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Patient Education
Cardiovascular Diseases
American Heart Association
Health
Vulnerable Populations
Population
Consumer Health Information
Health Literacy
Education
Pamphlets
Diabetes Complications
Cues
Life Style
Reading
Research Design
Language
Organizations
Literacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Evaluation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease print patient education materials for use with low-health literate populations. / Hill-Briggs, Felicia; Smith, Andrea S.

In: Diabetes Care, Vol. 31, No. 4, 04.2008, p. 667-671.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2947b922a324bdc97a04d4958716d46,
title = "Evaluation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease print patient education materials for use with low-health literate populations",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE-Populations with the lowest literacy and health literacy in the U.S. are also among those disproportionately burdened by diabetes and its complications. Yet, suitability of publicly available diabetes and cardiovascular (CVD) patient education materials for these patients is not clear. We evaluated selected American Diabetes Association (ADA) and American Heart Association (AHA) print education materials for accessibility and usability characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-English-language, print patient education brochures addressing lifestyle/behavioral management of diabetes and CVD were obtained from the ADA (n = 21) and the AHA (n = 19). Materials were evaluated using 32 criteria, 23 addressing literacy demand and 9 addressing behavioral activation, compiled from authoritative sources on development of low-literacy consumer health information. RESULTS-Of the 32 criteria identified by two or more sources, ADA materials consistently met 11 (34{\%}) and AHA materials consistently met 8 (25{\%}). Criteria most frequently achieved were text case, use of cues (e.g., bullets) to emphasize key points, design of graphics/illustrations, some provision of {"}how to{"} information, and positive depiction of cultural images. The least consistently achieved criteria were reading grade, word usage (e.g., scientific jargon), sentence length, font size, line length, white space, visual organization, limited scope, clear and specific (e.g., step-by-step) behavioral recommendations, and demonstration of audience relevance and cultural appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS-Materials consistently met few criteria for usability by patients with low literacy, limited prior medical knowledge, and/or limited resource availability. Use of available criteria and methods for increasing reach of print education materials to these underserved patient populations is indicated.",
author = "Felicia Hill-Briggs and Smith, {Andrea S.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.2337/dc07-1365",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "667--671",
journal = "Diabetes Care",
issn = "1935-5548",
publisher = "American Diabetes Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease print patient education materials for use with low-health literate populations

AU - Hill-Briggs, Felicia

AU - Smith, Andrea S.

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE-Populations with the lowest literacy and health literacy in the U.S. are also among those disproportionately burdened by diabetes and its complications. Yet, suitability of publicly available diabetes and cardiovascular (CVD) patient education materials for these patients is not clear. We evaluated selected American Diabetes Association (ADA) and American Heart Association (AHA) print education materials for accessibility and usability characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-English-language, print patient education brochures addressing lifestyle/behavioral management of diabetes and CVD were obtained from the ADA (n = 21) and the AHA (n = 19). Materials were evaluated using 32 criteria, 23 addressing literacy demand and 9 addressing behavioral activation, compiled from authoritative sources on development of low-literacy consumer health information. RESULTS-Of the 32 criteria identified by two or more sources, ADA materials consistently met 11 (34%) and AHA materials consistently met 8 (25%). Criteria most frequently achieved were text case, use of cues (e.g., bullets) to emphasize key points, design of graphics/illustrations, some provision of "how to" information, and positive depiction of cultural images. The least consistently achieved criteria were reading grade, word usage (e.g., scientific jargon), sentence length, font size, line length, white space, visual organization, limited scope, clear and specific (e.g., step-by-step) behavioral recommendations, and demonstration of audience relevance and cultural appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS-Materials consistently met few criteria for usability by patients with low literacy, limited prior medical knowledge, and/or limited resource availability. Use of available criteria and methods for increasing reach of print education materials to these underserved patient populations is indicated.

AB - OBJECTIVE-Populations with the lowest literacy and health literacy in the U.S. are also among those disproportionately burdened by diabetes and its complications. Yet, suitability of publicly available diabetes and cardiovascular (CVD) patient education materials for these patients is not clear. We evaluated selected American Diabetes Association (ADA) and American Heart Association (AHA) print education materials for accessibility and usability characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-English-language, print patient education brochures addressing lifestyle/behavioral management of diabetes and CVD were obtained from the ADA (n = 21) and the AHA (n = 19). Materials were evaluated using 32 criteria, 23 addressing literacy demand and 9 addressing behavioral activation, compiled from authoritative sources on development of low-literacy consumer health information. RESULTS-Of the 32 criteria identified by two or more sources, ADA materials consistently met 11 (34%) and AHA materials consistently met 8 (25%). Criteria most frequently achieved were text case, use of cues (e.g., bullets) to emphasize key points, design of graphics/illustrations, some provision of "how to" information, and positive depiction of cultural images. The least consistently achieved criteria were reading grade, word usage (e.g., scientific jargon), sentence length, font size, line length, white space, visual organization, limited scope, clear and specific (e.g., step-by-step) behavioral recommendations, and demonstration of audience relevance and cultural appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS-Materials consistently met few criteria for usability by patients with low literacy, limited prior medical knowledge, and/or limited resource availability. Use of available criteria and methods for increasing reach of print education materials to these underserved patient populations is indicated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48649083446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48649083446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2337/dc07-1365

DO - 10.2337/dc07-1365

M3 - Article

C2 - 18202245

AN - SCOPUS:48649083446

VL - 31

SP - 667

EP - 671

JO - Diabetes Care

JF - Diabetes Care

SN - 1935-5548

IS - 4

ER -