Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures

Robert V. O'Toole, Garrick Cox, K. Shanmuganathan, Renan Carlos Castillo, Clifford H. Turen, Marcus F. Sciadini, Jason W. Nascone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: We assessed whether, in contrast to reports in the literature, computed tomographic (CT) scans improve the ability to classify acetabular fractures in comparison with plain radiographs. Design: Prospective. Setting: Level I trauma center. Patients: Seventy-five patients with 75 acetabular fractures treated between June 2005 and May 2006. Intervention: Four different image sets for each patient were evaluated: image set A, Judet view plain radiographs plus axial view CT scans; image set B, Judet view plain radiographs alone; image set C, three-dimensional CT reconstructions; and image set D, CT-simulated anteroposterior and Judet views of the pelvis. The 300 image sets were viewed in random order by four orthopaedic trauma fellowship-trained surgeons who independently recorded a diagnosis. A gold standard diagnosis was determined by group consensus. Main Outcome Measurements: Agreement among four imaging methods was evaluated by using kappa statistics for multiple raters and nominal data. Results: Comparing the gold standard diagnosis with the four image sets, Judet view plain radiographs had a worse kappa value than CT scans (P <0.05). The adjusted kappa values for all three image sets that included CT scans averaged greater than 0.62, showing substantial agreement, whereas the image set with plain radiographs alone (image set B) had a lower kappa value of only 0.48 (P <0.05). Conclusions: In contrast to previous reports in the literature, the accuracy of plain radiographs alone was less than the accuracy of CT scans in terms of diagnosis. The interobserver reliability was also worse for plain radiographs alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)284-290
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tomography
Trauma Centers
Pelvis
Orthopedics
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Acetabular fractures
  • Computed tomography
  • Diagnosis
  • Plain radiographs
  • Simulated Judet views
  • Three dimensional reconstructions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

O'Toole, R. V., Cox, G., Shanmuganathan, K., Castillo, R. C., Turen, C. H., Sciadini, M. F., & Nascone, J. W. (2010). Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 24(5), 284-290. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c83bc0

Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures. / O'Toole, Robert V.; Cox, Garrick; Shanmuganathan, K.; Castillo, Renan Carlos; Turen, Clifford H.; Sciadini, Marcus F.; Nascone, Jason W.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 24, No. 5, 05.2010, p. 284-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Toole, RV, Cox, G, Shanmuganathan, K, Castillo, RC, Turen, CH, Sciadini, MF & Nascone, JW 2010, 'Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures', Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 284-290. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c83bc0
O'Toole, Robert V. ; Cox, Garrick ; Shanmuganathan, K. ; Castillo, Renan Carlos ; Turen, Clifford H. ; Sciadini, Marcus F. ; Nascone, Jason W. / Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 284-290.
@article{dc31fe490c4b40f59eea1126b78aa0c3,
title = "Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures",
abstract = "Objective: We assessed whether, in contrast to reports in the literature, computed tomographic (CT) scans improve the ability to classify acetabular fractures in comparison with plain radiographs. Design: Prospective. Setting: Level I trauma center. Patients: Seventy-five patients with 75 acetabular fractures treated between June 2005 and May 2006. Intervention: Four different image sets for each patient were evaluated: image set A, Judet view plain radiographs plus axial view CT scans; image set B, Judet view plain radiographs alone; image set C, three-dimensional CT reconstructions; and image set D, CT-simulated anteroposterior and Judet views of the pelvis. The 300 image sets were viewed in random order by four orthopaedic trauma fellowship-trained surgeons who independently recorded a diagnosis. A gold standard diagnosis was determined by group consensus. Main Outcome Measurements: Agreement among four imaging methods was evaluated by using kappa statistics for multiple raters and nominal data. Results: Comparing the gold standard diagnosis with the four image sets, Judet view plain radiographs had a worse kappa value than CT scans (P <0.05). The adjusted kappa values for all three image sets that included CT scans averaged greater than 0.62, showing substantial agreement, whereas the image set with plain radiographs alone (image set B) had a lower kappa value of only 0.48 (P <0.05). Conclusions: In contrast to previous reports in the literature, the accuracy of plain radiographs alone was less than the accuracy of CT scans in terms of diagnosis. The interobserver reliability was also worse for plain radiographs alone.",
keywords = "Acetabular fractures, Computed tomography, Diagnosis, Plain radiographs, Simulated Judet views, Three dimensional reconstructions",
author = "O'Toole, {Robert V.} and Garrick Cox and K. Shanmuganathan and Castillo, {Renan Carlos} and Turen, {Clifford H.} and Sciadini, {Marcus F.} and Nascone, {Jason W.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c83bc0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "284--290",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures

AU - O'Toole, Robert V.

AU - Cox, Garrick

AU - Shanmuganathan, K.

AU - Castillo, Renan Carlos

AU - Turen, Clifford H.

AU - Sciadini, Marcus F.

AU - Nascone, Jason W.

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Objective: We assessed whether, in contrast to reports in the literature, computed tomographic (CT) scans improve the ability to classify acetabular fractures in comparison with plain radiographs. Design: Prospective. Setting: Level I trauma center. Patients: Seventy-five patients with 75 acetabular fractures treated between June 2005 and May 2006. Intervention: Four different image sets for each patient were evaluated: image set A, Judet view plain radiographs plus axial view CT scans; image set B, Judet view plain radiographs alone; image set C, three-dimensional CT reconstructions; and image set D, CT-simulated anteroposterior and Judet views of the pelvis. The 300 image sets were viewed in random order by four orthopaedic trauma fellowship-trained surgeons who independently recorded a diagnosis. A gold standard diagnosis was determined by group consensus. Main Outcome Measurements: Agreement among four imaging methods was evaluated by using kappa statistics for multiple raters and nominal data. Results: Comparing the gold standard diagnosis with the four image sets, Judet view plain radiographs had a worse kappa value than CT scans (P <0.05). The adjusted kappa values for all three image sets that included CT scans averaged greater than 0.62, showing substantial agreement, whereas the image set with plain radiographs alone (image set B) had a lower kappa value of only 0.48 (P <0.05). Conclusions: In contrast to previous reports in the literature, the accuracy of plain radiographs alone was less than the accuracy of CT scans in terms of diagnosis. The interobserver reliability was also worse for plain radiographs alone.

AB - Objective: We assessed whether, in contrast to reports in the literature, computed tomographic (CT) scans improve the ability to classify acetabular fractures in comparison with plain radiographs. Design: Prospective. Setting: Level I trauma center. Patients: Seventy-five patients with 75 acetabular fractures treated between June 2005 and May 2006. Intervention: Four different image sets for each patient were evaluated: image set A, Judet view plain radiographs plus axial view CT scans; image set B, Judet view plain radiographs alone; image set C, three-dimensional CT reconstructions; and image set D, CT-simulated anteroposterior and Judet views of the pelvis. The 300 image sets were viewed in random order by four orthopaedic trauma fellowship-trained surgeons who independently recorded a diagnosis. A gold standard diagnosis was determined by group consensus. Main Outcome Measurements: Agreement among four imaging methods was evaluated by using kappa statistics for multiple raters and nominal data. Results: Comparing the gold standard diagnosis with the four image sets, Judet view plain radiographs had a worse kappa value than CT scans (P <0.05). The adjusted kappa values for all three image sets that included CT scans averaged greater than 0.62, showing substantial agreement, whereas the image set with plain radiographs alone (image set B) had a lower kappa value of only 0.48 (P <0.05). Conclusions: In contrast to previous reports in the literature, the accuracy of plain radiographs alone was less than the accuracy of CT scans in terms of diagnosis. The interobserver reliability was also worse for plain radiographs alone.

KW - Acetabular fractures

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Plain radiographs

KW - Simulated Judet views

KW - Three dimensional reconstructions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951777941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951777941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c83bc0

DO - 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c83bc0

M3 - Article

C2 - 20418733

AN - SCOPUS:77951777941

VL - 24

SP - 284

EP - 290

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 5

ER -