Evaluation of common problems in primary care: Effects of physician, practice, and financial characteristics

Christina M. Meyer, Paul W Ladenson, Julie A. Scharfstein, Mark D. Danese, Neil R. Powe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the resource use and costs associated with the diagnosis of common problems in primary care practice and to investigate the influence of physician characteristics, practice organization, and financial incentives on physician behavior. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Patients and methods: A national sample of 1721 primary care physicians from 53 managed care organizations were surveyed about their use of diagnostic laboratory, imaging, and invasive procedures; ambulatory visits; empiric drug therapies; and specialty consultations for a hypothetical middle-aged female patient presenting with 1 of 6 common clinical problems: depression, fatigue, impaired memory, anxiety, low back pain, or high cholesterol. Information regarding the physician's arrangement with managed care organizations was also collected. Cost estimates were made from Maryland Medicare Fee Schedule and Red Book data. Results: Total costs (mean ± standard deviation) were estimated for management of depression ($520 ± $235), fatigue ($389 ± $201), impaired memory ($569 ± $243), high cholesterol ($367 ± $191), low back pain ($726 ± $369), and anxiety ($438 ± $207). Younger physicians (less than 50 years old) generated higher costs in the treatment of depression but used fewer resources in the evaluation of high cholesterol. Physicians paid by salary had significantly lower costs compared with physicians in fee-for-service arrangements for depression and high cholesterol (P <.05). Physicians in multi-specialty groups were more likely to have lower costs for depression and low back pain in multivariate analyses. More stringent financial incentives such as capitation, withholds, and bonuses were not associated with lower costs. Conclusions: Multispecialty group practice and compensation by salary consistently predict lower costs for evaluation of common problems in primary care practice. Financial incentives such as capitation, withholds, and bonuses were not associated with an effect on costs of diagnostic evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-469
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal of Managed Care
Volume6
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2000

Fingerprint

Primary Care Physicians
physician
Costs and Cost Analysis
Physicians
costs
evaluation
Depression
Low Back Pain
Cholesterol
Motivation
pain
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Managed Care Programs
Organizations
incentive
salary
Fatigue
fatigue
managed care
fee

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Medicine(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of common problems in primary care : Effects of physician, practice, and financial characteristics. / Meyer, Christina M.; Ladenson, Paul W; Scharfstein, Julie A.; Danese, Mark D.; Powe, Neil R.

In: American Journal of Managed Care, Vol. 6, No. 4, 04.2000, p. 457-469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meyer, Christina M. ; Ladenson, Paul W ; Scharfstein, Julie A. ; Danese, Mark D. ; Powe, Neil R. / Evaluation of common problems in primary care : Effects of physician, practice, and financial characteristics. In: American Journal of Managed Care. 2000 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 457-469.
@article{64fed30aba72414cb2787e3efc822762,
title = "Evaluation of common problems in primary care: Effects of physician, practice, and financial characteristics",
abstract = "Objectives: To identify the resource use and costs associated with the diagnosis of common problems in primary care practice and to investigate the influence of physician characteristics, practice organization, and financial incentives on physician behavior. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Patients and methods: A national sample of 1721 primary care physicians from 53 managed care organizations were surveyed about their use of diagnostic laboratory, imaging, and invasive procedures; ambulatory visits; empiric drug therapies; and specialty consultations for a hypothetical middle-aged female patient presenting with 1 of 6 common clinical problems: depression, fatigue, impaired memory, anxiety, low back pain, or high cholesterol. Information regarding the physician's arrangement with managed care organizations was also collected. Cost estimates were made from Maryland Medicare Fee Schedule and Red Book data. Results: Total costs (mean ± standard deviation) were estimated for management of depression ($520 ± $235), fatigue ($389 ± $201), impaired memory ($569 ± $243), high cholesterol ($367 ± $191), low back pain ($726 ± $369), and anxiety ($438 ± $207). Younger physicians (less than 50 years old) generated higher costs in the treatment of depression but used fewer resources in the evaluation of high cholesterol. Physicians paid by salary had significantly lower costs compared with physicians in fee-for-service arrangements for depression and high cholesterol (P <.05). Physicians in multi-specialty groups were more likely to have lower costs for depression and low back pain in multivariate analyses. More stringent financial incentives such as capitation, withholds, and bonuses were not associated with lower costs. Conclusions: Multispecialty group practice and compensation by salary consistently predict lower costs for evaluation of common problems in primary care practice. Financial incentives such as capitation, withholds, and bonuses were not associated with an effect on costs of diagnostic evaluation.",
author = "Meyer, {Christina M.} and Ladenson, {Paul W} and Scharfstein, {Julie A.} and Danese, {Mark D.} and Powe, {Neil R.}",
year = "2000",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "457--469",
journal = "American Journal of Managed Care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of common problems in primary care

T2 - Effects of physician, practice, and financial characteristics

AU - Meyer, Christina M.

AU - Ladenson, Paul W

AU - Scharfstein, Julie A.

AU - Danese, Mark D.

AU - Powe, Neil R.

PY - 2000/4

Y1 - 2000/4

N2 - Objectives: To identify the resource use and costs associated with the diagnosis of common problems in primary care practice and to investigate the influence of physician characteristics, practice organization, and financial incentives on physician behavior. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Patients and methods: A national sample of 1721 primary care physicians from 53 managed care organizations were surveyed about their use of diagnostic laboratory, imaging, and invasive procedures; ambulatory visits; empiric drug therapies; and specialty consultations for a hypothetical middle-aged female patient presenting with 1 of 6 common clinical problems: depression, fatigue, impaired memory, anxiety, low back pain, or high cholesterol. Information regarding the physician's arrangement with managed care organizations was also collected. Cost estimates were made from Maryland Medicare Fee Schedule and Red Book data. Results: Total costs (mean ± standard deviation) were estimated for management of depression ($520 ± $235), fatigue ($389 ± $201), impaired memory ($569 ± $243), high cholesterol ($367 ± $191), low back pain ($726 ± $369), and anxiety ($438 ± $207). Younger physicians (less than 50 years old) generated higher costs in the treatment of depression but used fewer resources in the evaluation of high cholesterol. Physicians paid by salary had significantly lower costs compared with physicians in fee-for-service arrangements for depression and high cholesterol (P <.05). Physicians in multi-specialty groups were more likely to have lower costs for depression and low back pain in multivariate analyses. More stringent financial incentives such as capitation, withholds, and bonuses were not associated with lower costs. Conclusions: Multispecialty group practice and compensation by salary consistently predict lower costs for evaluation of common problems in primary care practice. Financial incentives such as capitation, withholds, and bonuses were not associated with an effect on costs of diagnostic evaluation.

AB - Objectives: To identify the resource use and costs associated with the diagnosis of common problems in primary care practice and to investigate the influence of physician characteristics, practice organization, and financial incentives on physician behavior. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Patients and methods: A national sample of 1721 primary care physicians from 53 managed care organizations were surveyed about their use of diagnostic laboratory, imaging, and invasive procedures; ambulatory visits; empiric drug therapies; and specialty consultations for a hypothetical middle-aged female patient presenting with 1 of 6 common clinical problems: depression, fatigue, impaired memory, anxiety, low back pain, or high cholesterol. Information regarding the physician's arrangement with managed care organizations was also collected. Cost estimates were made from Maryland Medicare Fee Schedule and Red Book data. Results: Total costs (mean ± standard deviation) were estimated for management of depression ($520 ± $235), fatigue ($389 ± $201), impaired memory ($569 ± $243), high cholesterol ($367 ± $191), low back pain ($726 ± $369), and anxiety ($438 ± $207). Younger physicians (less than 50 years old) generated higher costs in the treatment of depression but used fewer resources in the evaluation of high cholesterol. Physicians paid by salary had significantly lower costs compared with physicians in fee-for-service arrangements for depression and high cholesterol (P <.05). Physicians in multi-specialty groups were more likely to have lower costs for depression and low back pain in multivariate analyses. More stringent financial incentives such as capitation, withholds, and bonuses were not associated with lower costs. Conclusions: Multispecialty group practice and compensation by salary consistently predict lower costs for evaluation of common problems in primary care practice. Financial incentives such as capitation, withholds, and bonuses were not associated with an effect on costs of diagnostic evaluation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034001688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034001688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10977453

AN - SCOPUS:0034001688

VL - 6

SP - 457

EP - 469

JO - American Journal of Managed Care

JF - American Journal of Managed Care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - 4

ER -