Evaluation of antineoplastic drug exposure of health care workers at three university-based US cancer centers

Thomas H. Connor, Gayle DeBord, Jack R. Pretty, Marc S. Oliver, Tracy S. Roth, Peter Sj Lees, Edward F. Krieg, Bonnie Rogers, Carmen P. Escalante, Christine A. Toennis, John C. Clark, Belinda C. Johnson, Melissa A. McDiarmid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated health care worker exposure to antineoplastic drugs. Methods: A cross-sectional study examined environmental samples from pharmacy and nursing areas. A 6-week diary documented tasks involving those drugs. Urine was analyzed for two specific drugs, and blood samples were analyzed by the comet assay. Results: Sixty-eight exposed and 53 nonexposed workers were studied. Exposed workers recorded 10,000 drug-handling events during the 6-week period. Sixty percent of wipe samples were positive for at least one of the five drugs measured. Cyclophosphamide was most commonly detected, followed by 5-fluorouracil. Three of the 68 urine samples were positive for one drug. No genetic damage was detected in exposed workers using the comet assay. Conclusions: Despite following recommended safehandling practices, workplace contamination with antineoplastic drugs in pharmacy and nursing areas continues at these locations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1019-1027
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume52
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Antineoplastic Agents
Delivery of Health Care
Comet Assay
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Neoplasms
Nursing
Urine
Fluorouracil
Workplace
Cyclophosphamide
Cross-Sectional Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Evaluation of antineoplastic drug exposure of health care workers at three university-based US cancer centers. / Connor, Thomas H.; DeBord, Gayle; Pretty, Jack R.; Oliver, Marc S.; Roth, Tracy S.; Lees, Peter Sj; Krieg, Edward F.; Rogers, Bonnie; Escalante, Carmen P.; Toennis, Christine A.; Clark, John C.; Johnson, Belinda C.; McDiarmid, Melissa A.

In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 52, No. 10, 10.2010, p. 1019-1027.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Connor, TH, DeBord, G, Pretty, JR, Oliver, MS, Roth, TS, Lees, PS, Krieg, EF, Rogers, B, Escalante, CP, Toennis, CA, Clark, JC, Johnson, BC & McDiarmid, MA 2010, 'Evaluation of antineoplastic drug exposure of health care workers at three university-based US cancer centers', Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1019-1027. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181f72b63
Connor, Thomas H. ; DeBord, Gayle ; Pretty, Jack R. ; Oliver, Marc S. ; Roth, Tracy S. ; Lees, Peter Sj ; Krieg, Edward F. ; Rogers, Bonnie ; Escalante, Carmen P. ; Toennis, Christine A. ; Clark, John C. ; Johnson, Belinda C. ; McDiarmid, Melissa A. / Evaluation of antineoplastic drug exposure of health care workers at three university-based US cancer centers. In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 52, No. 10. pp. 1019-1027.
@article{9f7e7e1a9a4c4d809c0242b8da30d5c5,
title = "Evaluation of antineoplastic drug exposure of health care workers at three university-based US cancer centers",
abstract = "Objective: This study evaluated health care worker exposure to antineoplastic drugs. Methods: A cross-sectional study examined environmental samples from pharmacy and nursing areas. A 6-week diary documented tasks involving those drugs. Urine was analyzed for two specific drugs, and blood samples were analyzed by the comet assay. Results: Sixty-eight exposed and 53 nonexposed workers were studied. Exposed workers recorded 10,000 drug-handling events during the 6-week period. Sixty percent of wipe samples were positive for at least one of the five drugs measured. Cyclophosphamide was most commonly detected, followed by 5-fluorouracil. Three of the 68 urine samples were positive for one drug. No genetic damage was detected in exposed workers using the comet assay. Conclusions: Despite following recommended safehandling practices, workplace contamination with antineoplastic drugs in pharmacy and nursing areas continues at these locations.",
author = "Connor, {Thomas H.} and Gayle DeBord and Pretty, {Jack R.} and Oliver, {Marc S.} and Roth, {Tracy S.} and Lees, {Peter Sj} and Krieg, {Edward F.} and Bonnie Rogers and Escalante, {Carmen P.} and Toennis, {Christine A.} and Clark, {John C.} and Johnson, {Belinda C.} and McDiarmid, {Melissa A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181f72b63",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "1019--1027",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1076-2752",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of antineoplastic drug exposure of health care workers at three university-based US cancer centers

AU - Connor, Thomas H.

AU - DeBord, Gayle

AU - Pretty, Jack R.

AU - Oliver, Marc S.

AU - Roth, Tracy S.

AU - Lees, Peter Sj

AU - Krieg, Edward F.

AU - Rogers, Bonnie

AU - Escalante, Carmen P.

AU - Toennis, Christine A.

AU - Clark, John C.

AU - Johnson, Belinda C.

AU - McDiarmid, Melissa A.

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Objective: This study evaluated health care worker exposure to antineoplastic drugs. Methods: A cross-sectional study examined environmental samples from pharmacy and nursing areas. A 6-week diary documented tasks involving those drugs. Urine was analyzed for two specific drugs, and blood samples were analyzed by the comet assay. Results: Sixty-eight exposed and 53 nonexposed workers were studied. Exposed workers recorded 10,000 drug-handling events during the 6-week period. Sixty percent of wipe samples were positive for at least one of the five drugs measured. Cyclophosphamide was most commonly detected, followed by 5-fluorouracil. Three of the 68 urine samples were positive for one drug. No genetic damage was detected in exposed workers using the comet assay. Conclusions: Despite following recommended safehandling practices, workplace contamination with antineoplastic drugs in pharmacy and nursing areas continues at these locations.

AB - Objective: This study evaluated health care worker exposure to antineoplastic drugs. Methods: A cross-sectional study examined environmental samples from pharmacy and nursing areas. A 6-week diary documented tasks involving those drugs. Urine was analyzed for two specific drugs, and blood samples were analyzed by the comet assay. Results: Sixty-eight exposed and 53 nonexposed workers were studied. Exposed workers recorded 10,000 drug-handling events during the 6-week period. Sixty percent of wipe samples were positive for at least one of the five drugs measured. Cyclophosphamide was most commonly detected, followed by 5-fluorouracil. Three of the 68 urine samples were positive for one drug. No genetic damage was detected in exposed workers using the comet assay. Conclusions: Despite following recommended safehandling practices, workplace contamination with antineoplastic drugs in pharmacy and nursing areas continues at these locations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957995656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957995656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181f72b63

DO - 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181f72b63

M3 - Article

C2 - 20881620

AN - SCOPUS:77957995656

VL - 52

SP - 1019

EP - 1027

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1076-2752

IS - 10

ER -