Evaluation of acute renal colic: A comparison of non-contrast CT versus 3-T non-contrast HASTE MR urography

M. J. Semins, Z. Feng, Bruce Trock, M. Bohlman, W. Hosek, Brian Matlaga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

With the introduction of a 3-T scanner, magnetic resonance urography (MRU) may be an alternative imaging modality for evaluation of acute renal colic. We performed a prospective study to compare the performance of computed tomography (CT) with half-Fourier single shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) MRU in the evaluation of patients with suspected renal colic. Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute renal colic were eligible for inclusion. Following a standard CT stone evaluation, patients underwent a non-contrast HASTE MRU study with a 3-T scanner. The presence of perinephric fluid, hydronephrosis, ureteral obstruction, and calculus was assessed. A total of 22 patients completed the study. Twenty (91 %) were diagnosed with an upper tract stone by radiographic findings. MRU detected a discrete stone in 50 % of the patients with stones detected by CT. Perinephric fluid was noted in 12 MRUs, compared to 7 CTs. Using CT as the reference standard, the combination of stone or perinephric fluid and ureteral dilation gave MRU a sensitivity of 84 %, specificity of 100 %, and accuracy of 86 % (95 % CI 0.72-1.0). HASTE MRU with a 3-T MR scanner can reliably detect the presence of upper urinary tract obstruction. Although CT imaging remains the superior modality with which to detect calculi, MRU detects a greater number of secondary signs of upper tract obstruction. For situations in which the use of ionizing radiation is undesirable, MRU is a reasonable imaging alternative.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-46
Number of pages4
JournalUrological Research
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Renal Colic
Urography
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Tomography
Ureteral Calculi
Ureteral Obstruction
Hydronephrosis
Calculi
Ionizing Radiation
Urinary Tract
Hospital Emergency Service
Dilatation
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • CT
  • MRI
  • Nephrolithiasis
  • Radiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Evaluation of acute renal colic : A comparison of non-contrast CT versus 3-T non-contrast HASTE MR urography. / Semins, M. J.; Feng, Z.; Trock, Bruce; Bohlman, M.; Hosek, W.; Matlaga, Brian.

In: Urological Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, 02.2013, p. 43-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e305bf227b1a44cab4fc12046eac5f65,
title = "Evaluation of acute renal colic: A comparison of non-contrast CT versus 3-T non-contrast HASTE MR urography",
abstract = "With the introduction of a 3-T scanner, magnetic resonance urography (MRU) may be an alternative imaging modality for evaluation of acute renal colic. We performed a prospective study to compare the performance of computed tomography (CT) with half-Fourier single shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) MRU in the evaluation of patients with suspected renal colic. Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute renal colic were eligible for inclusion. Following a standard CT stone evaluation, patients underwent a non-contrast HASTE MRU study with a 3-T scanner. The presence of perinephric fluid, hydronephrosis, ureteral obstruction, and calculus was assessed. A total of 22 patients completed the study. Twenty (91 {\%}) were diagnosed with an upper tract stone by radiographic findings. MRU detected a discrete stone in 50 {\%} of the patients with stones detected by CT. Perinephric fluid was noted in 12 MRUs, compared to 7 CTs. Using CT as the reference standard, the combination of stone or perinephric fluid and ureteral dilation gave MRU a sensitivity of 84 {\%}, specificity of 100 {\%}, and accuracy of 86 {\%} (95 {\%} CI 0.72-1.0). HASTE MRU with a 3-T MR scanner can reliably detect the presence of upper urinary tract obstruction. Although CT imaging remains the superior modality with which to detect calculi, MRU detects a greater number of secondary signs of upper tract obstruction. For situations in which the use of ionizing radiation is undesirable, MRU is a reasonable imaging alternative.",
keywords = "CT, MRI, Nephrolithiasis, Radiation",
author = "Semins, {M. J.} and Z. Feng and Bruce Trock and M. Bohlman and W. Hosek and Brian Matlaga",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s00240-012-0525-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "43--46",
journal = "Urolithiasis",
issn = "2194-7228",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of acute renal colic

T2 - A comparison of non-contrast CT versus 3-T non-contrast HASTE MR urography

AU - Semins, M. J.

AU - Feng, Z.

AU - Trock, Bruce

AU - Bohlman, M.

AU - Hosek, W.

AU - Matlaga, Brian

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - With the introduction of a 3-T scanner, magnetic resonance urography (MRU) may be an alternative imaging modality for evaluation of acute renal colic. We performed a prospective study to compare the performance of computed tomography (CT) with half-Fourier single shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) MRU in the evaluation of patients with suspected renal colic. Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute renal colic were eligible for inclusion. Following a standard CT stone evaluation, patients underwent a non-contrast HASTE MRU study with a 3-T scanner. The presence of perinephric fluid, hydronephrosis, ureteral obstruction, and calculus was assessed. A total of 22 patients completed the study. Twenty (91 %) were diagnosed with an upper tract stone by radiographic findings. MRU detected a discrete stone in 50 % of the patients with stones detected by CT. Perinephric fluid was noted in 12 MRUs, compared to 7 CTs. Using CT as the reference standard, the combination of stone or perinephric fluid and ureteral dilation gave MRU a sensitivity of 84 %, specificity of 100 %, and accuracy of 86 % (95 % CI 0.72-1.0). HASTE MRU with a 3-T MR scanner can reliably detect the presence of upper urinary tract obstruction. Although CT imaging remains the superior modality with which to detect calculi, MRU detects a greater number of secondary signs of upper tract obstruction. For situations in which the use of ionizing radiation is undesirable, MRU is a reasonable imaging alternative.

AB - With the introduction of a 3-T scanner, magnetic resonance urography (MRU) may be an alternative imaging modality for evaluation of acute renal colic. We performed a prospective study to compare the performance of computed tomography (CT) with half-Fourier single shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) MRU in the evaluation of patients with suspected renal colic. Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute renal colic were eligible for inclusion. Following a standard CT stone evaluation, patients underwent a non-contrast HASTE MRU study with a 3-T scanner. The presence of perinephric fluid, hydronephrosis, ureteral obstruction, and calculus was assessed. A total of 22 patients completed the study. Twenty (91 %) were diagnosed with an upper tract stone by radiographic findings. MRU detected a discrete stone in 50 % of the patients with stones detected by CT. Perinephric fluid was noted in 12 MRUs, compared to 7 CTs. Using CT as the reference standard, the combination of stone or perinephric fluid and ureteral dilation gave MRU a sensitivity of 84 %, specificity of 100 %, and accuracy of 86 % (95 % CI 0.72-1.0). HASTE MRU with a 3-T MR scanner can reliably detect the presence of upper urinary tract obstruction. Although CT imaging remains the superior modality with which to detect calculi, MRU detects a greater number of secondary signs of upper tract obstruction. For situations in which the use of ionizing radiation is undesirable, MRU is a reasonable imaging alternative.

KW - CT

KW - MRI

KW - Nephrolithiasis

KW - Radiation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880919687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880919687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00240-012-0525-8

DO - 10.1007/s00240-012-0525-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 23532422

AN - SCOPUS:84880919687

VL - 41

SP - 43

EP - 46

JO - Urolithiasis

JF - Urolithiasis

SN - 2194-7228

IS - 1

ER -