Evaluation and Support Mechanisms of an Emerging University-wide Global Health Training Program

Katheryne Kalbarczyk, Elli Leontsini, Emily Combs, Fan Yang, Azal Ahmadi, Karen Charron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Global health education is in high demand in the United States, across the continuum of learning, and field experiences are an essential part of this education. However, evaluations of these programs are limited. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate a field placement program at Johns Hopkins University, in Baltimore, Maryland, to understand how to better support student training overseas and faculty mentorship. Methods We used qualitative and quantitative methods to gather data from program reporting requirements (152 student surveys and 46 experiential narrative essays), followed by 17 semistructured interviews, and 2 focus groups. Data were analyzed through manual coding and a socioecological model served as an analytical and a synthesizing framework. Findings A series of factors influence the participants' experience in overseas placements spanning across 4 aggregate levels, from individual to societal, including opportunity for professional advancement, independence, loneliness and illness, mentorship quality, funding, institutional partnership building, opportunity for public health contribution, and for development of cultural competency. Faculty and students thought that the program was beneficial to the learning experience, particularly for its contribution to experiential knowledge of a low- and middle-income country setting and for developing cross-cultural relationships. Communication and scope of work were 2 areas in which students and faculty members often had different expectations and many students emerged having cultivated different skills than they or their mentor initially expected. Students found the experience useful for both their academic and professional careers and faculty members saw mentorship, one of their professional responsibilities, emerge. Conclusions Many socioecological factors influence an overseas field experience, which in turn produces important effects on students' career choices, and faculty members appreciate the opportunity to serve as mentors. The most vital support mechanisms suggested for faculty and students included available funding, clear preparation, and communication facilitation across the experiential continuum.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)602-610
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Global Health
Volume81
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Mentors
Students
Education
Communication
Learning
Cultural Competency
Career Choice
Training Support
Loneliness
Baltimore
Global Health
Program Evaluation
Focus Groups
Health Education
Developing Countries
Research Design
Public Health
Interviews

Keywords

  • collaboration
  • communication
  • education
  • evaluation
  • global health
  • health
  • partnerships
  • public health
  • qualitative
  • training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Evaluation and Support Mechanisms of an Emerging University-wide Global Health Training Program. / Kalbarczyk, Katheryne; Leontsini, Elli; Combs, Emily; Yang, Fan; Ahmadi, Azal; Charron, Karen.

In: Annals of Global Health, Vol. 81, No. 5, 01.09.2015, p. 602-610.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bf38a52eca2244e2ab46620b2ed4cb80,
title = "Evaluation and Support Mechanisms of an Emerging University-wide Global Health Training Program",
abstract = "Background Global health education is in high demand in the United States, across the continuum of learning, and field experiences are an essential part of this education. However, evaluations of these programs are limited. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate a field placement program at Johns Hopkins University, in Baltimore, Maryland, to understand how to better support student training overseas and faculty mentorship. Methods We used qualitative and quantitative methods to gather data from program reporting requirements (152 student surveys and 46 experiential narrative essays), followed by 17 semistructured interviews, and 2 focus groups. Data were analyzed through manual coding and a socioecological model served as an analytical and a synthesizing framework. Findings A series of factors influence the participants' experience in overseas placements spanning across 4 aggregate levels, from individual to societal, including opportunity for professional advancement, independence, loneliness and illness, mentorship quality, funding, institutional partnership building, opportunity for public health contribution, and for development of cultural competency. Faculty and students thought that the program was beneficial to the learning experience, particularly for its contribution to experiential knowledge of a low- and middle-income country setting and for developing cross-cultural relationships. Communication and scope of work were 2 areas in which students and faculty members often had different expectations and many students emerged having cultivated different skills than they or their mentor initially expected. Students found the experience useful for both their academic and professional careers and faculty members saw mentorship, one of their professional responsibilities, emerge. Conclusions Many socioecological factors influence an overseas field experience, which in turn produces important effects on students' career choices, and faculty members appreciate the opportunity to serve as mentors. The most vital support mechanisms suggested for faculty and students included available funding, clear preparation, and communication facilitation across the experiential continuum.",
keywords = "collaboration, communication, education, evaluation, global health, health, partnerships, public health, qualitative, training",
author = "Katheryne Kalbarczyk and Elli Leontsini and Emily Combs and Fan Yang and Azal Ahmadi and Karen Charron",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "602--610",
journal = "Annals of Global Health",
issn = "2214-9996",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation and Support Mechanisms of an Emerging University-wide Global Health Training Program

AU - Kalbarczyk, Katheryne

AU - Leontsini, Elli

AU - Combs, Emily

AU - Yang, Fan

AU - Ahmadi, Azal

AU - Charron, Karen

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Background Global health education is in high demand in the United States, across the continuum of learning, and field experiences are an essential part of this education. However, evaluations of these programs are limited. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate a field placement program at Johns Hopkins University, in Baltimore, Maryland, to understand how to better support student training overseas and faculty mentorship. Methods We used qualitative and quantitative methods to gather data from program reporting requirements (152 student surveys and 46 experiential narrative essays), followed by 17 semistructured interviews, and 2 focus groups. Data were analyzed through manual coding and a socioecological model served as an analytical and a synthesizing framework. Findings A series of factors influence the participants' experience in overseas placements spanning across 4 aggregate levels, from individual to societal, including opportunity for professional advancement, independence, loneliness and illness, mentorship quality, funding, institutional partnership building, opportunity for public health contribution, and for development of cultural competency. Faculty and students thought that the program was beneficial to the learning experience, particularly for its contribution to experiential knowledge of a low- and middle-income country setting and for developing cross-cultural relationships. Communication and scope of work were 2 areas in which students and faculty members often had different expectations and many students emerged having cultivated different skills than they or their mentor initially expected. Students found the experience useful for both their academic and professional careers and faculty members saw mentorship, one of their professional responsibilities, emerge. Conclusions Many socioecological factors influence an overseas field experience, which in turn produces important effects on students' career choices, and faculty members appreciate the opportunity to serve as mentors. The most vital support mechanisms suggested for faculty and students included available funding, clear preparation, and communication facilitation across the experiential continuum.

AB - Background Global health education is in high demand in the United States, across the continuum of learning, and field experiences are an essential part of this education. However, evaluations of these programs are limited. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate a field placement program at Johns Hopkins University, in Baltimore, Maryland, to understand how to better support student training overseas and faculty mentorship. Methods We used qualitative and quantitative methods to gather data from program reporting requirements (152 student surveys and 46 experiential narrative essays), followed by 17 semistructured interviews, and 2 focus groups. Data were analyzed through manual coding and a socioecological model served as an analytical and a synthesizing framework. Findings A series of factors influence the participants' experience in overseas placements spanning across 4 aggregate levels, from individual to societal, including opportunity for professional advancement, independence, loneliness and illness, mentorship quality, funding, institutional partnership building, opportunity for public health contribution, and for development of cultural competency. Faculty and students thought that the program was beneficial to the learning experience, particularly for its contribution to experiential knowledge of a low- and middle-income country setting and for developing cross-cultural relationships. Communication and scope of work were 2 areas in which students and faculty members often had different expectations and many students emerged having cultivated different skills than they or their mentor initially expected. Students found the experience useful for both their academic and professional careers and faculty members saw mentorship, one of their professional responsibilities, emerge. Conclusions Many socioecological factors influence an overseas field experience, which in turn produces important effects on students' career choices, and faculty members appreciate the opportunity to serve as mentors. The most vital support mechanisms suggested for faculty and students included available funding, clear preparation, and communication facilitation across the experiential continuum.

KW - collaboration

KW - communication

KW - education

KW - evaluation

KW - global health

KW - health

KW - partnerships

KW - public health

KW - qualitative

KW - training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964009452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964009452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.025

DO - 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.025

M3 - Article

C2 - 27036716

AN - SCOPUS:84964009452

VL - 81

SP - 602

EP - 610

JO - Annals of Global Health

JF - Annals of Global Health

SN - 2214-9996

IS - 5

ER -