Evaluation and comparison of histopathologic grading systems of epithelial carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Gynecologic oncology group studies

Richard J. Stock, Richard Zaino, Brian N. Bundy, Frederic B Askin, Joan Woodward, Bernard Fetter, James Paulson, Philip J. Di Saia, Frederic B. Stehman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The subjects of this study are 445 patients with advanced cervical cancer treated by standardized radiation therapy. Upon entry into one of two Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocols, original pathologic diagnoses and histologic tumor descriptions for each patient were compared with separate evaluations made by a consensus opinion of two GOG pathologists. A review diagnosis using grade, cell type, and the Stendahl scoring system was then made by the first author (R.J.S.) without knowledge of the prior diagnoses. Of the original pathologists’ diagnoses, 21% did not include grade or cell type. There was little agreement among the different pathologists as to the use of either specific grade or cell type. Histologic grade, irrespective of the pathologists making the diagnosis, had no correlation to prognosis. The Reagan and Wentz large-cell keratinizing (LCK) cell type, when applied by the author to tumors with any form of squamous keratinization present, identified a group of patients with a poorer prognosis, although not independently of other prognostic factors. The Stendahl scoring system identified a number of patients with both a poorer and better prognosis. This was statistically significant and independent of other risk factors. A major limitation, however, was the number of patients evaluable because of inadequate biopsy material in 23.6% of the study group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-108
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology
Volume13
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Cervix Uteri
Carcinoma
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Biopsy
Pathologists

Keywords

  • Advanced carcinoma uterine cervix
  • Histologic classification
  • Histopathologic grading systems
  • Reagan-Wentz cell type
  • Stendahl scoring system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Evaluation and comparison of histopathologic grading systems of epithelial carcinoma of the uterine cervix : Gynecologic oncology group studies. / Stock, Richard J.; Zaino, Richard; Bundy, Brian N.; Askin, Frederic B; Woodward, Joan; Fetter, Bernard; Paulson, James; Di Saia, Philip J.; Stehman, Frederic B.

In: International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1994, p. 99-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stock, Richard J. ; Zaino, Richard ; Bundy, Brian N. ; Askin, Frederic B ; Woodward, Joan ; Fetter, Bernard ; Paulson, James ; Di Saia, Philip J. ; Stehman, Frederic B. / Evaluation and comparison of histopathologic grading systems of epithelial carcinoma of the uterine cervix : Gynecologic oncology group studies. In: International Journal of Gynecological Pathology. 1994 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 99-108.
@article{1d4e44d4adee4518a697f6267854a815,
title = "Evaluation and comparison of histopathologic grading systems of epithelial carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Gynecologic oncology group studies",
abstract = "The subjects of this study are 445 patients with advanced cervical cancer treated by standardized radiation therapy. Upon entry into one of two Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocols, original pathologic diagnoses and histologic tumor descriptions for each patient were compared with separate evaluations made by a consensus opinion of two GOG pathologists. A review diagnosis using grade, cell type, and the Stendahl scoring system was then made by the first author (R.J.S.) without knowledge of the prior diagnoses. Of the original pathologists’ diagnoses, 21{\%} did not include grade or cell type. There was little agreement among the different pathologists as to the use of either specific grade or cell type. Histologic grade, irrespective of the pathologists making the diagnosis, had no correlation to prognosis. The Reagan and Wentz large-cell keratinizing (LCK) cell type, when applied by the author to tumors with any form of squamous keratinization present, identified a group of patients with a poorer prognosis, although not independently of other prognostic factors. The Stendahl scoring system identified a number of patients with both a poorer and better prognosis. This was statistically significant and independent of other risk factors. A major limitation, however, was the number of patients evaluable because of inadequate biopsy material in 23.6{\%} of the study group.",
keywords = "Advanced carcinoma uterine cervix, Histologic classification, Histopathologic grading systems, Reagan-Wentz cell type, Stendahl scoring system",
author = "Stock, {Richard J.} and Richard Zaino and Bundy, {Brian N.} and Askin, {Frederic B} and Joan Woodward and Bernard Fetter and James Paulson and {Di Saia}, {Philip J.} and Stehman, {Frederic B.}",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "99--108",
journal = "International Journal of Gynecological Pathology",
issn = "0277-1691",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation and comparison of histopathologic grading systems of epithelial carcinoma of the uterine cervix

T2 - Gynecologic oncology group studies

AU - Stock, Richard J.

AU - Zaino, Richard

AU - Bundy, Brian N.

AU - Askin, Frederic B

AU - Woodward, Joan

AU - Fetter, Bernard

AU - Paulson, James

AU - Di Saia, Philip J.

AU - Stehman, Frederic B.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - The subjects of this study are 445 patients with advanced cervical cancer treated by standardized radiation therapy. Upon entry into one of two Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocols, original pathologic diagnoses and histologic tumor descriptions for each patient were compared with separate evaluations made by a consensus opinion of two GOG pathologists. A review diagnosis using grade, cell type, and the Stendahl scoring system was then made by the first author (R.J.S.) without knowledge of the prior diagnoses. Of the original pathologists’ diagnoses, 21% did not include grade or cell type. There was little agreement among the different pathologists as to the use of either specific grade or cell type. Histologic grade, irrespective of the pathologists making the diagnosis, had no correlation to prognosis. The Reagan and Wentz large-cell keratinizing (LCK) cell type, when applied by the author to tumors with any form of squamous keratinization present, identified a group of patients with a poorer prognosis, although not independently of other prognostic factors. The Stendahl scoring system identified a number of patients with both a poorer and better prognosis. This was statistically significant and independent of other risk factors. A major limitation, however, was the number of patients evaluable because of inadequate biopsy material in 23.6% of the study group.

AB - The subjects of this study are 445 patients with advanced cervical cancer treated by standardized radiation therapy. Upon entry into one of two Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocols, original pathologic diagnoses and histologic tumor descriptions for each patient were compared with separate evaluations made by a consensus opinion of two GOG pathologists. A review diagnosis using grade, cell type, and the Stendahl scoring system was then made by the first author (R.J.S.) without knowledge of the prior diagnoses. Of the original pathologists’ diagnoses, 21% did not include grade or cell type. There was little agreement among the different pathologists as to the use of either specific grade or cell type. Histologic grade, irrespective of the pathologists making the diagnosis, had no correlation to prognosis. The Reagan and Wentz large-cell keratinizing (LCK) cell type, when applied by the author to tumors with any form of squamous keratinization present, identified a group of patients with a poorer prognosis, although not independently of other prognostic factors. The Stendahl scoring system identified a number of patients with both a poorer and better prognosis. This was statistically significant and independent of other risk factors. A major limitation, however, was the number of patients evaluable because of inadequate biopsy material in 23.6% of the study group.

KW - Advanced carcinoma uterine cervix

KW - Histologic classification

KW - Histopathologic grading systems

KW - Reagan-Wentz cell type

KW - Stendahl scoring system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028211368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028211368&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8005742

AN - SCOPUS:0028211368

VL - 13

SP - 99

EP - 108

JO - International Journal of Gynecological Pathology

JF - International Journal of Gynecological Pathology

SN - 0277-1691

IS - 2

ER -