Evaluating the evidence for the effectiveness of prevention

Leon Gordis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This report reviews a number of issues that should be considered in evaluating the evidence for the effectiveness of primary and secondary prevention. In evaluating primary prevention, changes in disease incidence are the ideal index but mortality may also be a useful surrogate in certain cases. Both relative risk and attributable risk are valuable concepts in evaluating the benefits of primary prevention. In evaluating screening, the most notable approach to secondary prevention, certain potential biases should be taken into account. These include selection biases due to referral or length-biased sampling, lead time bias, and overdiagnosis bias. An understanding of the methodologic issues involved in evaluating prevention will help ensure the validity of any conclusions drawn regarding the effectiveness of preventive measures and programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S14-S16
JournalJournal of general internal medicine
Volume5
Issue number2 Supplement
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1990

Keywords

  • bias
  • effectiveness
  • primary and secondary prevention
  • risks
  • screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the evidence for the effectiveness of prevention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this