Evaluating accuracy of structural geometry by DXA methods with an anthropometric proximal femur phantom

B. C C Khoo, T. J. Beck, K. Brown, R. I. Price

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

DXA-derived bone structural geometry has been reported extensively but lacks an accuracy standard. In this study, we describe a novel anthropometric structural geometry phantom that simulates the proximal femur for use in assessing accuracy of geometry measurements by DXA or other X-ray methods. The phantom consists of seven different interchangeable neck modules with geometries that span the range of dimensions in an adult human proximal femur, including those representing osteoporosis. Ten repeated hip scans of each neck module using two current DXA scanner models were performed without repositioning. After scanner specific calibration, hip structure analysis was used to derive structural geometry. Scanner performance was similar for the two manufacturers. DXA-derived HSA geometric measurements were highly correlated with values derived directly from phantom geometry and position; R2 between DXA and phantom measures were greater than 94 % for all parameters, while precision error ranged between 0.3 and 3.9 %. Despite high R2 there were some systematic geometry errors for both scanners that were small for outer diameter, but increasing with complexity of geometrical parameter; e.g. buckling ratio. In summary, the anthropometric phantom and its fabrication concept were shown to be appropriate for evaluating proximal femoral structural geometry in two different DXA systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-287
Number of pages9
JournalAustralasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Femur
Hip
Neck
Geometry
Thigh
Calibration
Osteoporosis
X-Rays
Bone and Bones
Buckling
Bone
Fabrication
X rays

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Anthropometric phantoms
  • Bone structural geometry
  • Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
  • Hip structural analysis
  • Precision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Evaluating accuracy of structural geometry by DXA methods with an anthropometric proximal femur phantom. / Khoo, B. C C; Beck, T. J.; Brown, K.; Price, R. I.

In: Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2013, p. 279-287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9175e8d1989a40b58c1ff5735c4ff19d,
title = "Evaluating accuracy of structural geometry by DXA methods with an anthropometric proximal femur phantom",
abstract = "DXA-derived bone structural geometry has been reported extensively but lacks an accuracy standard. In this study, we describe a novel anthropometric structural geometry phantom that simulates the proximal femur for use in assessing accuracy of geometry measurements by DXA or other X-ray methods. The phantom consists of seven different interchangeable neck modules with geometries that span the range of dimensions in an adult human proximal femur, including those representing osteoporosis. Ten repeated hip scans of each neck module using two current DXA scanner models were performed without repositioning. After scanner specific calibration, hip structure analysis was used to derive structural geometry. Scanner performance was similar for the two manufacturers. DXA-derived HSA geometric measurements were highly correlated with values derived directly from phantom geometry and position; R2 between DXA and phantom measures were greater than 94 {\%} for all parameters, while precision error ranged between 0.3 and 3.9 {\%}. Despite high R2 there were some systematic geometry errors for both scanners that were small for outer diameter, but increasing with complexity of geometrical parameter; e.g. buckling ratio. In summary, the anthropometric phantom and its fabrication concept were shown to be appropriate for evaluating proximal femoral structural geometry in two different DXA systems.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Anthropometric phantoms, Bone structural geometry, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Hip structural analysis, Precision",
author = "Khoo, {B. C C} and Beck, {T. J.} and K. Brown and Price, {R. I.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s13246-013-0209-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "279--287",
journal = "Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine",
issn = "0158-9938",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating accuracy of structural geometry by DXA methods with an anthropometric proximal femur phantom

AU - Khoo, B. C C

AU - Beck, T. J.

AU - Brown, K.

AU - Price, R. I.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - DXA-derived bone structural geometry has been reported extensively but lacks an accuracy standard. In this study, we describe a novel anthropometric structural geometry phantom that simulates the proximal femur for use in assessing accuracy of geometry measurements by DXA or other X-ray methods. The phantom consists of seven different interchangeable neck modules with geometries that span the range of dimensions in an adult human proximal femur, including those representing osteoporosis. Ten repeated hip scans of each neck module using two current DXA scanner models were performed without repositioning. After scanner specific calibration, hip structure analysis was used to derive structural geometry. Scanner performance was similar for the two manufacturers. DXA-derived HSA geometric measurements were highly correlated with values derived directly from phantom geometry and position; R2 between DXA and phantom measures were greater than 94 % for all parameters, while precision error ranged between 0.3 and 3.9 %. Despite high R2 there were some systematic geometry errors for both scanners that were small for outer diameter, but increasing with complexity of geometrical parameter; e.g. buckling ratio. In summary, the anthropometric phantom and its fabrication concept were shown to be appropriate for evaluating proximal femoral structural geometry in two different DXA systems.

AB - DXA-derived bone structural geometry has been reported extensively but lacks an accuracy standard. In this study, we describe a novel anthropometric structural geometry phantom that simulates the proximal femur for use in assessing accuracy of geometry measurements by DXA or other X-ray methods. The phantom consists of seven different interchangeable neck modules with geometries that span the range of dimensions in an adult human proximal femur, including those representing osteoporosis. Ten repeated hip scans of each neck module using two current DXA scanner models were performed without repositioning. After scanner specific calibration, hip structure analysis was used to derive structural geometry. Scanner performance was similar for the two manufacturers. DXA-derived HSA geometric measurements were highly correlated with values derived directly from phantom geometry and position; R2 between DXA and phantom measures were greater than 94 % for all parameters, while precision error ranged between 0.3 and 3.9 %. Despite high R2 there were some systematic geometry errors for both scanners that were small for outer diameter, but increasing with complexity of geometrical parameter; e.g. buckling ratio. In summary, the anthropometric phantom and its fabrication concept were shown to be appropriate for evaluating proximal femoral structural geometry in two different DXA systems.

KW - Accuracy

KW - Anthropometric phantoms

KW - Bone structural geometry

KW - Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

KW - Hip structural analysis

KW - Precision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884283922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884283922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13246-013-0209-x

DO - 10.1007/s13246-013-0209-x

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 279

EP - 287

JO - Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine

JF - Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine

SN - 0158-9938

IS - 3

ER -