Evaluating a Dyadic Intervention on Risk Reduction Among People Who Inject Drugs

Natalie Flath, Karin E Tobin, Aleks Mihailovic, Paige Hammond, Carl A Latkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Among 100 people who inject drugs enrolled in a peer mentorship intervention aiming to promote injection-related risk reduction behavior change, we evaluated the role of participation in a dyad session on reducing sharing of syringes and cookers in the past 6 months. Dyad participants (n = 69) invited an injection, sex partner, or family member to the study site to reinforce learnt behavior change tools by practicing communication skills and risk reduction lessons. In all, 31 participants did not participate in the dyad session. We descriptively assessed changes in sharing injection equipment between the 2 time points of pre- and postintervention using the tests of proportions by dyad participation. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sex was used with an interaction term (time points × dyad participation) to evaluate the dyad effect. Dyad participants reported reduced syringe and cooker sharing at postintervention (sharing syringe: 17% versus 39%, P <.05 and cooker: 32% versus 59%, P <.01). There was no difference between the dyad group’s sharing injection equipment behavior after the intervention (sharing syringes: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-3.9 and cookers: aOR 0.72; 95% CI 0.1-3.5). The role of the dyad session alone on risk taking was not effective. With a small sample size, it is important to continue to evaluate the nature of peer-based dyadic experiences in future studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSubstance Abuse: Research and Treatment
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Needle Sharing
Risk Reduction Behavior
Injections
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Equipment and Supplies
Mentors
Risk-Taking
Sample Size
Logistic Models
Communication

Keywords

  • Harm reduction
  • health behavior
  • social networks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Evaluating a Dyadic Intervention on Risk Reduction Among People Who Inject Drugs. / Flath, Natalie; Tobin, Karin E; Mihailovic, Aleks; Hammond, Paige; Latkin, Carl A.

In: Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, Vol. 12, 01.09.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a35c0e77b034d34adeb139907db4527,
title = "Evaluating a Dyadic Intervention on Risk Reduction Among People Who Inject Drugs",
abstract = "Among 100 people who inject drugs enrolled in a peer mentorship intervention aiming to promote injection-related risk reduction behavior change, we evaluated the role of participation in a dyad session on reducing sharing of syringes and cookers in the past 6 months. Dyad participants (n = 69) invited an injection, sex partner, or family member to the study site to reinforce learnt behavior change tools by practicing communication skills and risk reduction lessons. In all, 31 participants did not participate in the dyad session. We descriptively assessed changes in sharing injection equipment between the 2 time points of pre- and postintervention using the tests of proportions by dyad participation. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sex was used with an interaction term (time points × dyad participation) to evaluate the dyad effect. Dyad participants reported reduced syringe and cooker sharing at postintervention (sharing syringe: 17{\%} versus 39{\%}, P <.05 and cooker: 32{\%} versus 59{\%}, P <.01). There was no difference between the dyad group’s sharing injection equipment behavior after the intervention (sharing syringes: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.76; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0.1-3.9 and cookers: aOR 0.72; 95{\%} CI 0.1-3.5). The role of the dyad session alone on risk taking was not effective. With a small sample size, it is important to continue to evaluate the nature of peer-based dyadic experiences in future studies.",
keywords = "Harm reduction, health behavior, social networks",
author = "Natalie Flath and Tobin, {Karin E} and Aleks Mihailovic and Paige Hammond and Latkin, {Carl A}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1178221818799753",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment",
issn = "1178-2218",
publisher = "Libertas Academica Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating a Dyadic Intervention on Risk Reduction Among People Who Inject Drugs

AU - Flath, Natalie

AU - Tobin, Karin E

AU - Mihailovic, Aleks

AU - Hammond, Paige

AU - Latkin, Carl A

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Among 100 people who inject drugs enrolled in a peer mentorship intervention aiming to promote injection-related risk reduction behavior change, we evaluated the role of participation in a dyad session on reducing sharing of syringes and cookers in the past 6 months. Dyad participants (n = 69) invited an injection, sex partner, or family member to the study site to reinforce learnt behavior change tools by practicing communication skills and risk reduction lessons. In all, 31 participants did not participate in the dyad session. We descriptively assessed changes in sharing injection equipment between the 2 time points of pre- and postintervention using the tests of proportions by dyad participation. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sex was used with an interaction term (time points × dyad participation) to evaluate the dyad effect. Dyad participants reported reduced syringe and cooker sharing at postintervention (sharing syringe: 17% versus 39%, P <.05 and cooker: 32% versus 59%, P <.01). There was no difference between the dyad group’s sharing injection equipment behavior after the intervention (sharing syringes: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-3.9 and cookers: aOR 0.72; 95% CI 0.1-3.5). The role of the dyad session alone on risk taking was not effective. With a small sample size, it is important to continue to evaluate the nature of peer-based dyadic experiences in future studies.

AB - Among 100 people who inject drugs enrolled in a peer mentorship intervention aiming to promote injection-related risk reduction behavior change, we evaluated the role of participation in a dyad session on reducing sharing of syringes and cookers in the past 6 months. Dyad participants (n = 69) invited an injection, sex partner, or family member to the study site to reinforce learnt behavior change tools by practicing communication skills and risk reduction lessons. In all, 31 participants did not participate in the dyad session. We descriptively assessed changes in sharing injection equipment between the 2 time points of pre- and postintervention using the tests of proportions by dyad participation. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sex was used with an interaction term (time points × dyad participation) to evaluate the dyad effect. Dyad participants reported reduced syringe and cooker sharing at postintervention (sharing syringe: 17% versus 39%, P <.05 and cooker: 32% versus 59%, P <.01). There was no difference between the dyad group’s sharing injection equipment behavior after the intervention (sharing syringes: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-3.9 and cookers: aOR 0.72; 95% CI 0.1-3.5). The role of the dyad session alone on risk taking was not effective. With a small sample size, it is important to continue to evaluate the nature of peer-based dyadic experiences in future studies.

KW - Harm reduction

KW - health behavior

KW - social networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060334019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060334019&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1178221818799753

DO - 10.1177/1178221818799753

M3 - Article

C2 - 30210233

AN - SCOPUS:85060334019

VL - 12

JO - Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment

JF - Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment

SN - 1178-2218

ER -