Ethics, pandemics, and the duty to treat

Heidi Malm, Thomas May, Leslie P. Francis, Saad B. Omer, Daniel Salmon, Robert Hood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Numerous grounds have been offered for the view that healthcare workers have a duty to treat, including expressed consent, implied consent, special training, reciprocity (also called the social contract view), and professional oaths and codes. Quite often, however, these grounds are simply asserted without being adequately defended or without the defenses being critically evaluated. This essay aims to help remedy that problem by providing a critical examination of the strengths and weaknesses of each of these five grounds for asserting that healthcare workers have a duty to treat, especially as that duty would arise in the context of an infectious disease pandemic. Ultimately, it argues that none of the defenses is currently sufficient to ground the kind of duty that would be needed in a pandemic. It concludes by sketching some practical recommendations in that regard.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4-19
Number of pages16
JournalAmerican Journal of Bioethics
Volume8
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2008

Fingerprint

Pandemics
Ethics
Delivery of Health Care
Contracts
Communicable Diseases

Keywords

  • AIDS
  • Bioterrorism
  • Moral theory
  • Philosophy
  • Professional ethics
  • Public health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cite this

Malm, H., May, T., Francis, L. P., Omer, S. B., Salmon, D., & Hood, R. (2008). Ethics, pandemics, and the duty to treat. American Journal of Bioethics, 8(8), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160802317974

Ethics, pandemics, and the duty to treat. / Malm, Heidi; May, Thomas; Francis, Leslie P.; Omer, Saad B.; Salmon, Daniel; Hood, Robert.

In: American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 8, No. 8, 08.2008, p. 4-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Malm, H, May, T, Francis, LP, Omer, SB, Salmon, D & Hood, R 2008, 'Ethics, pandemics, and the duty to treat', American Journal of Bioethics, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160802317974
Malm, Heidi ; May, Thomas ; Francis, Leslie P. ; Omer, Saad B. ; Salmon, Daniel ; Hood, Robert. / Ethics, pandemics, and the duty to treat. In: American Journal of Bioethics. 2008 ; Vol. 8, No. 8. pp. 4-19.
@article{d5c6b856cd304fdf9d09a92eeec133e6,
title = "Ethics, pandemics, and the duty to treat",
abstract = "Numerous grounds have been offered for the view that healthcare workers have a duty to treat, including expressed consent, implied consent, special training, reciprocity (also called the social contract view), and professional oaths and codes. Quite often, however, these grounds are simply asserted without being adequately defended or without the defenses being critically evaluated. This essay aims to help remedy that problem by providing a critical examination of the strengths and weaknesses of each of these five grounds for asserting that healthcare workers have a duty to treat, especially as that duty would arise in the context of an infectious disease pandemic. Ultimately, it argues that none of the defenses is currently sufficient to ground the kind of duty that would be needed in a pandemic. It concludes by sketching some practical recommendations in that regard.",
keywords = "AIDS, Bioterrorism, Moral theory, Philosophy, Professional ethics, Public health",
author = "Heidi Malm and Thomas May and Francis, {Leslie P.} and Omer, {Saad B.} and Daniel Salmon and Robert Hood",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1080/15265160802317974",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "4--19",
journal = "American Journal of Bioethics",
issn = "1526-5161",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethics, pandemics, and the duty to treat

AU - Malm, Heidi

AU - May, Thomas

AU - Francis, Leslie P.

AU - Omer, Saad B.

AU - Salmon, Daniel

AU - Hood, Robert

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - Numerous grounds have been offered for the view that healthcare workers have a duty to treat, including expressed consent, implied consent, special training, reciprocity (also called the social contract view), and professional oaths and codes. Quite often, however, these grounds are simply asserted without being adequately defended or without the defenses being critically evaluated. This essay aims to help remedy that problem by providing a critical examination of the strengths and weaknesses of each of these five grounds for asserting that healthcare workers have a duty to treat, especially as that duty would arise in the context of an infectious disease pandemic. Ultimately, it argues that none of the defenses is currently sufficient to ground the kind of duty that would be needed in a pandemic. It concludes by sketching some practical recommendations in that regard.

AB - Numerous grounds have been offered for the view that healthcare workers have a duty to treat, including expressed consent, implied consent, special training, reciprocity (also called the social contract view), and professional oaths and codes. Quite often, however, these grounds are simply asserted without being adequately defended or without the defenses being critically evaluated. This essay aims to help remedy that problem by providing a critical examination of the strengths and weaknesses of each of these five grounds for asserting that healthcare workers have a duty to treat, especially as that duty would arise in the context of an infectious disease pandemic. Ultimately, it argues that none of the defenses is currently sufficient to ground the kind of duty that would be needed in a pandemic. It concludes by sketching some practical recommendations in that regard.

KW - AIDS

KW - Bioterrorism

KW - Moral theory

KW - Philosophy

KW - Professional ethics

KW - Public health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52149090304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52149090304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15265160802317974

DO - 10.1080/15265160802317974

M3 - Article

C2 - 18802849

AN - SCOPUS:52149090304

VL - 8

SP - 4

EP - 19

JO - American Journal of Bioethics

JF - American Journal of Bioethics

SN - 1526-5161

IS - 8

ER -