Ethical considerations surrounding first time procedures: a study and analysis of patient attitudes toward spinal taps by students.

C. T. Williams, N. Fost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A patient is not always told when a student is performing a procedure for the first time. Withholding this information is a form of deception. It is justified on paternalistic grounds (it is in the patient's interest not to know), or on public policy grounds (given the choice, patients would refuse, thus compromising the training of future physicians). Using the spinal tap procedure (lumbar puncture) as a paradigm, 173 patients were surveyed to determine how they felt about first time procedures by medical students, interns, and residents. The patients indicated that they would be willing to be the subject for a student's (52%), intern's (62%), or resident's (66%) first spinal tap. This paper reassesses the ethics of consent for first time procedures based on responses to this survey.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)217-231
Number of pages15
JournalKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Volume2
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spinal Puncture
Students
student
resident
medical student
Deception
Public Policy
Medical Students
public policy
Ethics
moral philosophy
physician
paradigm
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Ethical considerations surrounding first time procedures : a study and analysis of patient attitudes toward spinal taps by students. / Williams, C. T.; Fost, N.

In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Vol. 2, No. 3, 09.1992, p. 217-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{215035754a8c4783885f59852b0de494,
title = "Ethical considerations surrounding first time procedures: a study and analysis of patient attitudes toward spinal taps by students.",
abstract = "A patient is not always told when a student is performing a procedure for the first time. Withholding this information is a form of deception. It is justified on paternalistic grounds (it is in the patient's interest not to know), or on public policy grounds (given the choice, patients would refuse, thus compromising the training of future physicians). Using the spinal tap procedure (lumbar puncture) as a paradigm, 173 patients were surveyed to determine how they felt about first time procedures by medical students, interns, and residents. The patients indicated that they would be willing to be the subject for a student's (52{\%}), intern's (62{\%}), or resident's (66{\%}) first spinal tap. This paper reassesses the ethics of consent for first time procedures based on responses to this survey.",
author = "Williams, {C. T.} and N. Fost",
year = "1992",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "217--231",
journal = "Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal",
issn = "1054-6863",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical considerations surrounding first time procedures

T2 - a study and analysis of patient attitudes toward spinal taps by students.

AU - Williams, C. T.

AU - Fost, N.

PY - 1992/9

Y1 - 1992/9

N2 - A patient is not always told when a student is performing a procedure for the first time. Withholding this information is a form of deception. It is justified on paternalistic grounds (it is in the patient's interest not to know), or on public policy grounds (given the choice, patients would refuse, thus compromising the training of future physicians). Using the spinal tap procedure (lumbar puncture) as a paradigm, 173 patients were surveyed to determine how they felt about first time procedures by medical students, interns, and residents. The patients indicated that they would be willing to be the subject for a student's (52%), intern's (62%), or resident's (66%) first spinal tap. This paper reassesses the ethics of consent for first time procedures based on responses to this survey.

AB - A patient is not always told when a student is performing a procedure for the first time. Withholding this information is a form of deception. It is justified on paternalistic grounds (it is in the patient's interest not to know), or on public policy grounds (given the choice, patients would refuse, thus compromising the training of future physicians). Using the spinal tap procedure (lumbar puncture) as a paradigm, 173 patients were surveyed to determine how they felt about first time procedures by medical students, interns, and residents. The patients indicated that they would be willing to be the subject for a student's (52%), intern's (62%), or resident's (66%) first spinal tap. This paper reassesses the ethics of consent for first time procedures based on responses to this survey.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026913441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026913441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10121088

AN - SCOPUS:0026913441

VL - 2

SP - 217

EP - 231

JO - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

JF - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

SN - 1054-6863

IS - 3

ER -