Estimating vaccination coverage using parental recall, vaccination cards, and medical records

Paul A Bolton, E. Holt, A. Ross, N. Hughart, Bernard Guyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. To compare estimates based on vaccination cards, parental recall, and medical records of the percentages of children up-to-date on vaccinations for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis; polio; and measles, mumps, and rubella. Method. The authors analyzed parent interview and medical records data from the Baltimore Immunization Study for 525 2-year-olds born from August 1988 through March 1989 to mothers living in low-income Census tracts of the city of Baltimore. Results. Only one-third of children had vaccination cards; based on medical records, these children had higher up- to-date coverage at 24 months of age than did children without cards. For individual vaccines, only two-thirds of parents could provide information to calculate coverage rates; however, almost all provided enough information to estimate coverage for the primary series. For each vaccine and the series, parental recall estimates were at least 17 percentage points higher than estimates from medical records. For children without vaccination cards whose parents could not provide coverage information, up-to-date rates based on medical records were consistently lower than for children with cards or with parents who provided coverage information. Conclusions. Population-based vaccine coverage surveys that rely on vaccination cards or parental recall or both may overestimate vaccination coverage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)521-526
Number of pages6
JournalPublic Health Reports
Volume113
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Medical Records
Vaccination
Baltimore
Vaccines
Parents
Mumps
Diphtheria
Rubella
Whooping Cough
Tetanus
Measles
Poliomyelitis
Censuses
Immunization
Mothers
Interviews
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Estimating vaccination coverage using parental recall, vaccination cards, and medical records. / Bolton, Paul A; Holt, E.; Ross, A.; Hughart, N.; Guyer, Bernard.

In: Public Health Reports, Vol. 113, No. 6, 1998, p. 521-526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f35860fa1f004d7e88b3cd7e4cf7159c,
title = "Estimating vaccination coverage using parental recall, vaccination cards, and medical records",
abstract = "Objective. To compare estimates based on vaccination cards, parental recall, and medical records of the percentages of children up-to-date on vaccinations for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis; polio; and measles, mumps, and rubella. Method. The authors analyzed parent interview and medical records data from the Baltimore Immunization Study for 525 2-year-olds born from August 1988 through March 1989 to mothers living in low-income Census tracts of the city of Baltimore. Results. Only one-third of children had vaccination cards; based on medical records, these children had higher up- to-date coverage at 24 months of age than did children without cards. For individual vaccines, only two-thirds of parents could provide information to calculate coverage rates; however, almost all provided enough information to estimate coverage for the primary series. For each vaccine and the series, parental recall estimates were at least 17 percentage points higher than estimates from medical records. For children without vaccination cards whose parents could not provide coverage information, up-to-date rates based on medical records were consistently lower than for children with cards or with parents who provided coverage information. Conclusions. Population-based vaccine coverage surveys that rely on vaccination cards or parental recall or both may overestimate vaccination coverage.",
author = "Bolton, {Paul A} and E. Holt and A. Ross and N. Hughart and Bernard Guyer",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "521--526",
journal = "Public Health Reports",
issn = "0033-3549",
publisher = "Association of Schools of Public Health",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating vaccination coverage using parental recall, vaccination cards, and medical records

AU - Bolton, Paul A

AU - Holt, E.

AU - Ross, A.

AU - Hughart, N.

AU - Guyer, Bernard

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Objective. To compare estimates based on vaccination cards, parental recall, and medical records of the percentages of children up-to-date on vaccinations for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis; polio; and measles, mumps, and rubella. Method. The authors analyzed parent interview and medical records data from the Baltimore Immunization Study for 525 2-year-olds born from August 1988 through March 1989 to mothers living in low-income Census tracts of the city of Baltimore. Results. Only one-third of children had vaccination cards; based on medical records, these children had higher up- to-date coverage at 24 months of age than did children without cards. For individual vaccines, only two-thirds of parents could provide information to calculate coverage rates; however, almost all provided enough information to estimate coverage for the primary series. For each vaccine and the series, parental recall estimates were at least 17 percentage points higher than estimates from medical records. For children without vaccination cards whose parents could not provide coverage information, up-to-date rates based on medical records were consistently lower than for children with cards or with parents who provided coverage information. Conclusions. Population-based vaccine coverage surveys that rely on vaccination cards or parental recall or both may overestimate vaccination coverage.

AB - Objective. To compare estimates based on vaccination cards, parental recall, and medical records of the percentages of children up-to-date on vaccinations for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis; polio; and measles, mumps, and rubella. Method. The authors analyzed parent interview and medical records data from the Baltimore Immunization Study for 525 2-year-olds born from August 1988 through March 1989 to mothers living in low-income Census tracts of the city of Baltimore. Results. Only one-third of children had vaccination cards; based on medical records, these children had higher up- to-date coverage at 24 months of age than did children without cards. For individual vaccines, only two-thirds of parents could provide information to calculate coverage rates; however, almost all provided enough information to estimate coverage for the primary series. For each vaccine and the series, parental recall estimates were at least 17 percentage points higher than estimates from medical records. For children without vaccination cards whose parents could not provide coverage information, up-to-date rates based on medical records were consistently lower than for children with cards or with parents who provided coverage information. Conclusions. Population-based vaccine coverage surveys that rely on vaccination cards or parental recall or both may overestimate vaccination coverage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032421348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032421348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9847923

AN - SCOPUS:0032421348

VL - 113

SP - 521

EP - 526

JO - Public Health Reports

JF - Public Health Reports

SN - 0033-3549

IS - 6

ER -