Estimating the Effects of Residential Mobility

A Methodological Note

Philip M.E. Garboden, Tama Leventhal, Sandra J Newman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article reviews the methodological challenges of estimating a causal association between mobility and children's cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development. Utilizing a comprehensive set of empirical articles published in the past 25 years that employ quantitative methods, it describes the limitations of previous studies and the innovative ways that researchers have attempted to deal with them. The concept of mobility is inconsistently operationalized along four dimensions: school versus residential, distance, timing, and frequency. Imprecise operationalization conflates different forms of mobility, which have differential effects on development. Attempts to estimate a causal association between mobility and development suffer from three sources of bias: selection, contextual shifts, and contemporaneous instigating events. (a) Methods that account for unobserved differences between mobile and nonmobile children have consistently shown smaller or even positive effects of mobility. (b) Moving can have a positive or negative effect on children's ecological contexts in ways that are systematically correlated with child development. (c) Moves are frequently catalyzed by changes in family structure and employment. The article concludes with recommendations for future research. Researchers should continue to engage fixed- and random-effect, matching, and instrumental variable techniques, each of which makes the question of causality explicit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)246-261
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Social Service Research
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2017

Fingerprint

physical development
emotional development
operationalization
cognitive development
family structure
quantitative method
causality
social development
event
trend
school

Keywords

  • causality
  • child development
  • methodology
  • Mobility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Estimating the Effects of Residential Mobility : A Methodological Note. / Garboden, Philip M.E.; Leventhal, Tama; Newman, Sandra J.

In: Journal of Social Service Research, Vol. 43, No. 2, 15.03.2017, p. 246-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Garboden, Philip M.E. ; Leventhal, Tama ; Newman, Sandra J. / Estimating the Effects of Residential Mobility : A Methodological Note. In: Journal of Social Service Research. 2017 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 246-261.
@article{33b84182b457436f8205781ddd2e4e6a,
title = "Estimating the Effects of Residential Mobility: A Methodological Note",
abstract = "This article reviews the methodological challenges of estimating a causal association between mobility and children's cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development. Utilizing a comprehensive set of empirical articles published in the past 25 years that employ quantitative methods, it describes the limitations of previous studies and the innovative ways that researchers have attempted to deal with them. The concept of mobility is inconsistently operationalized along four dimensions: school versus residential, distance, timing, and frequency. Imprecise operationalization conflates different forms of mobility, which have differential effects on development. Attempts to estimate a causal association between mobility and development suffer from three sources of bias: selection, contextual shifts, and contemporaneous instigating events. (a) Methods that account for unobserved differences between mobile and nonmobile children have consistently shown smaller or even positive effects of mobility. (b) Moving can have a positive or negative effect on children's ecological contexts in ways that are systematically correlated with child development. (c) Moves are frequently catalyzed by changes in family structure and employment. The article concludes with recommendations for future research. Researchers should continue to engage fixed- and random-effect, matching, and instrumental variable techniques, each of which makes the question of causality explicit.",
keywords = "causality, child development, methodology, Mobility",
author = "Garboden, {Philip M.E.} and Tama Leventhal and Newman, {Sandra J}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1080/01488376.2017.1282392",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "246--261",
journal = "Journal of Social Service Research",
issn = "0148-8376",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating the Effects of Residential Mobility

T2 - A Methodological Note

AU - Garboden, Philip M.E.

AU - Leventhal, Tama

AU - Newman, Sandra J

PY - 2017/3/15

Y1 - 2017/3/15

N2 - This article reviews the methodological challenges of estimating a causal association between mobility and children's cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development. Utilizing a comprehensive set of empirical articles published in the past 25 years that employ quantitative methods, it describes the limitations of previous studies and the innovative ways that researchers have attempted to deal with them. The concept of mobility is inconsistently operationalized along four dimensions: school versus residential, distance, timing, and frequency. Imprecise operationalization conflates different forms of mobility, which have differential effects on development. Attempts to estimate a causal association between mobility and development suffer from three sources of bias: selection, contextual shifts, and contemporaneous instigating events. (a) Methods that account for unobserved differences between mobile and nonmobile children have consistently shown smaller or even positive effects of mobility. (b) Moving can have a positive or negative effect on children's ecological contexts in ways that are systematically correlated with child development. (c) Moves are frequently catalyzed by changes in family structure and employment. The article concludes with recommendations for future research. Researchers should continue to engage fixed- and random-effect, matching, and instrumental variable techniques, each of which makes the question of causality explicit.

AB - This article reviews the methodological challenges of estimating a causal association between mobility and children's cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development. Utilizing a comprehensive set of empirical articles published in the past 25 years that employ quantitative methods, it describes the limitations of previous studies and the innovative ways that researchers have attempted to deal with them. The concept of mobility is inconsistently operationalized along four dimensions: school versus residential, distance, timing, and frequency. Imprecise operationalization conflates different forms of mobility, which have differential effects on development. Attempts to estimate a causal association between mobility and development suffer from three sources of bias: selection, contextual shifts, and contemporaneous instigating events. (a) Methods that account for unobserved differences between mobile and nonmobile children have consistently shown smaller or even positive effects of mobility. (b) Moving can have a positive or negative effect on children's ecological contexts in ways that are systematically correlated with child development. (c) Moves are frequently catalyzed by changes in family structure and employment. The article concludes with recommendations for future research. Researchers should continue to engage fixed- and random-effect, matching, and instrumental variable techniques, each of which makes the question of causality explicit.

KW - causality

KW - child development

KW - methodology

KW - Mobility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015866698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015866698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01488376.2017.1282392

DO - 10.1080/01488376.2017.1282392

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 246

EP - 261

JO - Journal of Social Service Research

JF - Journal of Social Service Research

SN - 0148-8376

IS - 2

ER -