Estimating minimum adequate foster care costs for children in the United States

Haksoon Ahn, Diane DePanfilis, Kevin Frick, Richard P. Barth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although foster care homes play a crucial role in providing stable placements to children who enter the child welfare system due to maltreatment, there is currently no federal minimum rate nor standard methodology to establish adequate rates to support foster parents to meet these children's needs. Therefore, it is important to establish a model to estimate the real costs associated with caring for children to serve as a foundation for states to set adequate reimbursement rates. The objectives of this study are to: use the methodology of a 2007 study to establish foster care minimum adequate rates for children (MARC) based on the child's age and geographical location in every state; update the MARC with cost of living adjustments to 2016; examine changes in gaps between the MARC and the current foster care rates; and identify states that have made increases to their reimbursement rates, relative to the MARC over time. Results found that all but four states provide lower foster care reimbursement rates than the adequate costs in 2016. This study recommends that, at the federal level, enhanced precision in operational definitions of care categories could increase consistency in the way that states reimburse foster families. Additionally, findings provide policy suggestions to establish a national methodology standard and increase foster care rates to the level that will meet children's needs. This study will enhance the scant body of literature found on establishing an economic model to estimate foster care costs.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages55-67
Number of pages13
JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
Volume84
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Child Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
costs
methodology
Economic Models
Social Adjustment
cost of living
foster family
foster parents
Foster Home Care
maltreatment
economic model
home care
Child Welfare
child welfare
Parents
Economics

Keywords

  • Cost analysis
  • Foster care
  • Foster care reimbursement rates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Estimating minimum adequate foster care costs for children in the United States. / Ahn, Haksoon; DePanfilis, Diane; Frick, Kevin; Barth, Richard P.

In: Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 84, 01.01.2018, p. 55-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ahn, Haksoon ; DePanfilis, Diane ; Frick, Kevin ; Barth, Richard P./ Estimating minimum adequate foster care costs for children in the United States. In: Children and Youth Services Review. 2018 ; Vol. 84. pp. 55-67
@article{05a2740da8fc419ebfe895283db02b74,
title = "Estimating minimum adequate foster care costs for children in the United States",
abstract = "Although foster care homes play a crucial role in providing stable placements to children who enter the child welfare system due to maltreatment, there is currently no federal minimum rate nor standard methodology to establish adequate rates to support foster parents to meet these children's needs. Therefore, it is important to establish a model to estimate the real costs associated with caring for children to serve as a foundation for states to set adequate reimbursement rates. The objectives of this study are to: use the methodology of a 2007 study to establish foster care minimum adequate rates for children (MARC) based on the child's age and geographical location in every state; update the MARC with cost of living adjustments to 2016; examine changes in gaps between the MARC and the current foster care rates; and identify states that have made increases to their reimbursement rates, relative to the MARC over time. Results found that all but four states provide lower foster care reimbursement rates than the adequate costs in 2016. This study recommends that, at the federal level, enhanced precision in operational definitions of care categories could increase consistency in the way that states reimburse foster families. Additionally, findings provide policy suggestions to establish a national methodology standard and increase foster care rates to the level that will meet children's needs. This study will enhance the scant body of literature found on establishing an economic model to estimate foster care costs.",
keywords = "Cost analysis, Foster care, Foster care reimbursement rates",
author = "Haksoon Ahn and Diane DePanfilis and Kevin Frick and Barth, {Richard P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.10.045",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "55--67",
journal = "Children and Youth Services Review",
issn = "0190-7409",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating minimum adequate foster care costs for children in the United States

AU - Ahn,Haksoon

AU - DePanfilis,Diane

AU - Frick,Kevin

AU - Barth,Richard P.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Although foster care homes play a crucial role in providing stable placements to children who enter the child welfare system due to maltreatment, there is currently no federal minimum rate nor standard methodology to establish adequate rates to support foster parents to meet these children's needs. Therefore, it is important to establish a model to estimate the real costs associated with caring for children to serve as a foundation for states to set adequate reimbursement rates. The objectives of this study are to: use the methodology of a 2007 study to establish foster care minimum adequate rates for children (MARC) based on the child's age and geographical location in every state; update the MARC with cost of living adjustments to 2016; examine changes in gaps between the MARC and the current foster care rates; and identify states that have made increases to their reimbursement rates, relative to the MARC over time. Results found that all but four states provide lower foster care reimbursement rates than the adequate costs in 2016. This study recommends that, at the federal level, enhanced precision in operational definitions of care categories could increase consistency in the way that states reimburse foster families. Additionally, findings provide policy suggestions to establish a national methodology standard and increase foster care rates to the level that will meet children's needs. This study will enhance the scant body of literature found on establishing an economic model to estimate foster care costs.

AB - Although foster care homes play a crucial role in providing stable placements to children who enter the child welfare system due to maltreatment, there is currently no federal minimum rate nor standard methodology to establish adequate rates to support foster parents to meet these children's needs. Therefore, it is important to establish a model to estimate the real costs associated with caring for children to serve as a foundation for states to set adequate reimbursement rates. The objectives of this study are to: use the methodology of a 2007 study to establish foster care minimum adequate rates for children (MARC) based on the child's age and geographical location in every state; update the MARC with cost of living adjustments to 2016; examine changes in gaps between the MARC and the current foster care rates; and identify states that have made increases to their reimbursement rates, relative to the MARC over time. Results found that all but four states provide lower foster care reimbursement rates than the adequate costs in 2016. This study recommends that, at the federal level, enhanced precision in operational definitions of care categories could increase consistency in the way that states reimburse foster families. Additionally, findings provide policy suggestions to establish a national methodology standard and increase foster care rates to the level that will meet children's needs. This study will enhance the scant body of literature found on establishing an economic model to estimate foster care costs.

KW - Cost analysis

KW - Foster care

KW - Foster care reimbursement rates

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034579941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034579941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.10.045

DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.10.045

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 55

EP - 67

JO - Children and Youth Services Review

T2 - Children and Youth Services Review

JF - Children and Youth Services Review

SN - 0190-7409

ER -