Estimating Anesthesia time using the medicare claim: A validation study

Jeffrey H. Silber, Paul R. Rosenbaum, Orit Even-Shoshan, Lanyu Mi, Fabienne A. Kyle, Yun Teng, Dale W. Bratzler, Lee A. Fleisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Procedure length is a fundamental variable associated with quality of care, though seldom studied on a large scale. The authors sought to estimate procedure length through information obtained in the anesthesia claim submitted to Medicare to validate this method for future studies. Methods: The Obesity and Surgical Outcomes Study enlisted 47 hospitals located across New York, Texas, and Illinois to study patients undergoing hip, knee, colon, and thoracotomy procedures. A total of 15,914 charts were abstracted to determine body mass index and initial patient physiology. Included in this abstraction were induction, cut, close, and recovery room times. This chart information was merged to Medicare claims that included anesthesia Part B billing information. Correlations between chart times and claim times were analyzed, models developed, and median absolute differences in minutes calculated. Results: Of the 15,914 eligible patients, there were 14,369 for whom both chart and claim times were available for analysis. For these 14,369, the Spearman correlation between chart and claim time was 0.94 (95% CI 0.94, 0.95), and the median absolute difference between chart and claim time was only 5 min (95% CI: 5.0, 5.5). The anesthesia claim can also be used to estimate surgical procedure length, with only a modest increase in error. Conclusion: The anesthesia bill found in Medicare claims provides an excellent source of information for studying surgery time on a vast scale throughout the United States. However, errors in both chart abstraction and anesthesia claims can occur. Care must be taken in the handling of outliers in these data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)322-333
Number of pages12
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume115
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Validation Studies
Medicare
Anesthesia
Recovery Room
Quality of Health Care
Thoracotomy
Hip
Knee
Colon
Body Mass Index
Obesity
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Silber, J. H., Rosenbaum, P. R., Even-Shoshan, O., Mi, L., Kyle, F. A., Teng, Y., ... Fleisher, L. A. (2011). Estimating Anesthesia time using the medicare claim: A validation study. Anesthesiology, 115(2), 322-333. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821d6c81

Estimating Anesthesia time using the medicare claim : A validation study. / Silber, Jeffrey H.; Rosenbaum, Paul R.; Even-Shoshan, Orit; Mi, Lanyu; Kyle, Fabienne A.; Teng, Yun; Bratzler, Dale W.; Fleisher, Lee A.

In: Anesthesiology, Vol. 115, No. 2, 08.2011, p. 322-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Silber, JH, Rosenbaum, PR, Even-Shoshan, O, Mi, L, Kyle, FA, Teng, Y, Bratzler, DW & Fleisher, LA 2011, 'Estimating Anesthesia time using the medicare claim: A validation study', Anesthesiology, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 322-333. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821d6c81
Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Even-Shoshan O, Mi L, Kyle FA, Teng Y et al. Estimating Anesthesia time using the medicare claim: A validation study. Anesthesiology. 2011 Aug;115(2):322-333. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821d6c81
Silber, Jeffrey H. ; Rosenbaum, Paul R. ; Even-Shoshan, Orit ; Mi, Lanyu ; Kyle, Fabienne A. ; Teng, Yun ; Bratzler, Dale W. ; Fleisher, Lee A. / Estimating Anesthesia time using the medicare claim : A validation study. In: Anesthesiology. 2011 ; Vol. 115, No. 2. pp. 322-333.
@article{5493f8110ff4473296073cea62313d7d,
title = "Estimating Anesthesia time using the medicare claim: A validation study",
abstract = "Introduction: Procedure length is a fundamental variable associated with quality of care, though seldom studied on a large scale. The authors sought to estimate procedure length through information obtained in the anesthesia claim submitted to Medicare to validate this method for future studies. Methods: The Obesity and Surgical Outcomes Study enlisted 47 hospitals located across New York, Texas, and Illinois to study patients undergoing hip, knee, colon, and thoracotomy procedures. A total of 15,914 charts were abstracted to determine body mass index and initial patient physiology. Included in this abstraction were induction, cut, close, and recovery room times. This chart information was merged to Medicare claims that included anesthesia Part B billing information. Correlations between chart times and claim times were analyzed, models developed, and median absolute differences in minutes calculated. Results: Of the 15,914 eligible patients, there were 14,369 for whom both chart and claim times were available for analysis. For these 14,369, the Spearman correlation between chart and claim time was 0.94 (95{\%} CI 0.94, 0.95), and the median absolute difference between chart and claim time was only 5 min (95{\%} CI: 5.0, 5.5). The anesthesia claim can also be used to estimate surgical procedure length, with only a modest increase in error. Conclusion: The anesthesia bill found in Medicare claims provides an excellent source of information for studying surgery time on a vast scale throughout the United States. However, errors in both chart abstraction and anesthesia claims can occur. Care must be taken in the handling of outliers in these data.",
author = "Silber, {Jeffrey H.} and Rosenbaum, {Paul R.} and Orit Even-Shoshan and Lanyu Mi and Kyle, {Fabienne A.} and Yun Teng and Bratzler, {Dale W.} and Fleisher, {Lee A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821d6c81",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "322--333",
journal = "Anesthesiology",
issn = "0003-3022",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating Anesthesia time using the medicare claim

T2 - A validation study

AU - Silber, Jeffrey H.

AU - Rosenbaum, Paul R.

AU - Even-Shoshan, Orit

AU - Mi, Lanyu

AU - Kyle, Fabienne A.

AU - Teng, Yun

AU - Bratzler, Dale W.

AU - Fleisher, Lee A.

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - Introduction: Procedure length is a fundamental variable associated with quality of care, though seldom studied on a large scale. The authors sought to estimate procedure length through information obtained in the anesthesia claim submitted to Medicare to validate this method for future studies. Methods: The Obesity and Surgical Outcomes Study enlisted 47 hospitals located across New York, Texas, and Illinois to study patients undergoing hip, knee, colon, and thoracotomy procedures. A total of 15,914 charts were abstracted to determine body mass index and initial patient physiology. Included in this abstraction were induction, cut, close, and recovery room times. This chart information was merged to Medicare claims that included anesthesia Part B billing information. Correlations between chart times and claim times were analyzed, models developed, and median absolute differences in minutes calculated. Results: Of the 15,914 eligible patients, there were 14,369 for whom both chart and claim times were available for analysis. For these 14,369, the Spearman correlation between chart and claim time was 0.94 (95% CI 0.94, 0.95), and the median absolute difference between chart and claim time was only 5 min (95% CI: 5.0, 5.5). The anesthesia claim can also be used to estimate surgical procedure length, with only a modest increase in error. Conclusion: The anesthesia bill found in Medicare claims provides an excellent source of information for studying surgery time on a vast scale throughout the United States. However, errors in both chart abstraction and anesthesia claims can occur. Care must be taken in the handling of outliers in these data.

AB - Introduction: Procedure length is a fundamental variable associated with quality of care, though seldom studied on a large scale. The authors sought to estimate procedure length through information obtained in the anesthesia claim submitted to Medicare to validate this method for future studies. Methods: The Obesity and Surgical Outcomes Study enlisted 47 hospitals located across New York, Texas, and Illinois to study patients undergoing hip, knee, colon, and thoracotomy procedures. A total of 15,914 charts were abstracted to determine body mass index and initial patient physiology. Included in this abstraction were induction, cut, close, and recovery room times. This chart information was merged to Medicare claims that included anesthesia Part B billing information. Correlations between chart times and claim times were analyzed, models developed, and median absolute differences in minutes calculated. Results: Of the 15,914 eligible patients, there were 14,369 for whom both chart and claim times were available for analysis. For these 14,369, the Spearman correlation between chart and claim time was 0.94 (95% CI 0.94, 0.95), and the median absolute difference between chart and claim time was only 5 min (95% CI: 5.0, 5.5). The anesthesia claim can also be used to estimate surgical procedure length, with only a modest increase in error. Conclusion: The anesthesia bill found in Medicare claims provides an excellent source of information for studying surgery time on a vast scale throughout the United States. However, errors in both chart abstraction and anesthesia claims can occur. Care must be taken in the handling of outliers in these data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961020735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961020735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821d6c81

DO - 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821d6c81

M3 - Article

C2 - 21720242

AN - SCOPUS:79961020735

VL - 115

SP - 322

EP - 333

JO - Anesthesiology

JF - Anesthesiology

SN - 0003-3022

IS - 2

ER -