Establishing a proactive safety and health risk management system in the fire service

Gerald S. Poplin, Keshia Pollack, Stephanie Griffin, Virginia Day-Nash, Wayne F. Peate, Ed Nied, John Gulotta, Jefferey L. Burgess

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Formalized risk management (RM) is an internationally accepted process for reducing hazards in the workplace, with defined steps including hazard scoping, risk assessment, and implementation of controls, all within an iterative process. While required for all industry in the European Union and widely used elsewhere, the United States maintains a compliance-based regulatory structure, rather than one based on systematic, risk-based methodologies. Firefighting is a hazardous profession, with high injury, illness, and fatality rates compared with other occupations, and implementation of RM programs has the potential to greatly improve firefighter safety and health; however, no descriptions of RM implementation are in the peer-reviewed literature for the North American fire service. Methods: In this paper we describe the steps used to design and implement the RM process in a moderately-sized fire department, with particular focus on prioritizing and managing injury hazards during patient transport, fireground, and physical exercise procedures. Hazard scoping and formalized risk assessments are described, in addition to the identification of participatory-led injury control strategies. Process evaluation methods were conducted to primarily assess the feasibility of voluntarily instituting the RM approach within the fire service setting. Results: The RM process was well accepted by the fire department and led to development of 45 hazard specific-interventions. Qualitative data documenting the implementation of the RM process revealed that participants emphasized the: value of the RM process, especially the participatory bottom-up approach; usefulness of the RM process for breaking down tasks to identify potential risks; and potential of RM for reducing firefighter injury. Conclusions: As implemented, this risk-based approach used to identify and manage occupational hazards and risks was successful and is deemed feasible for U.S. (and other) fire services. While several barriers and challenges do exist in the implementation of any intervention such as this, recommendations for adopting the process are provided. Additional work will be performed to determine the effectiveness of select controls strategies that were implemented; however participants throughout the organizational structure perceived the RM process to be of high utility while researchers also found the process improved the awareness and engagement in actively enhancing worker safety and health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number407
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 19 2015

Fingerprint

Risk Management
Safety
Health
Firefighters
Wounds and Injuries
European Union
Occupations
Workplace
Compliance
Industry
Research Personnel
Exercise

Keywords

  • Fire service
  • Risk management
  • Safety and health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Poplin, G. S., Pollack, K., Griffin, S., Day-Nash, V., Peate, W. F., Nied, E., ... Burgess, J. L. (2015). Establishing a proactive safety and health risk management system in the fire service. BMC Public Health, 15(1), [407]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1675-8

Establishing a proactive safety and health risk management system in the fire service. / Poplin, Gerald S.; Pollack, Keshia; Griffin, Stephanie; Day-Nash, Virginia; Peate, Wayne F.; Nied, Ed; Gulotta, John; Burgess, Jefferey L.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 15, No. 1, 407, 19.04.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Poplin, GS, Pollack, K, Griffin, S, Day-Nash, V, Peate, WF, Nied, E, Gulotta, J & Burgess, JL 2015, 'Establishing a proactive safety and health risk management system in the fire service', BMC Public Health, vol. 15, no. 1, 407. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1675-8
Poplin, Gerald S. ; Pollack, Keshia ; Griffin, Stephanie ; Day-Nash, Virginia ; Peate, Wayne F. ; Nied, Ed ; Gulotta, John ; Burgess, Jefferey L. / Establishing a proactive safety and health risk management system in the fire service. In: BMC Public Health. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 1.
@article{79bbcebe461f4e46b5cf25166054c97a,
title = "Establishing a proactive safety and health risk management system in the fire service",
abstract = "Background: Formalized risk management (RM) is an internationally accepted process for reducing hazards in the workplace, with defined steps including hazard scoping, risk assessment, and implementation of controls, all within an iterative process. While required for all industry in the European Union and widely used elsewhere, the United States maintains a compliance-based regulatory structure, rather than one based on systematic, risk-based methodologies. Firefighting is a hazardous profession, with high injury, illness, and fatality rates compared with other occupations, and implementation of RM programs has the potential to greatly improve firefighter safety and health; however, no descriptions of RM implementation are in the peer-reviewed literature for the North American fire service. Methods: In this paper we describe the steps used to design and implement the RM process in a moderately-sized fire department, with particular focus on prioritizing and managing injury hazards during patient transport, fireground, and physical exercise procedures. Hazard scoping and formalized risk assessments are described, in addition to the identification of participatory-led injury control strategies. Process evaluation methods were conducted to primarily assess the feasibility of voluntarily instituting the RM approach within the fire service setting. Results: The RM process was well accepted by the fire department and led to development of 45 hazard specific-interventions. Qualitative data documenting the implementation of the RM process revealed that participants emphasized the: value of the RM process, especially the participatory bottom-up approach; usefulness of the RM process for breaking down tasks to identify potential risks; and potential of RM for reducing firefighter injury. Conclusions: As implemented, this risk-based approach used to identify and manage occupational hazards and risks was successful and is deemed feasible for U.S. (and other) fire services. While several barriers and challenges do exist in the implementation of any intervention such as this, recommendations for adopting the process are provided. Additional work will be performed to determine the effectiveness of select controls strategies that were implemented; however participants throughout the organizational structure perceived the RM process to be of high utility while researchers also found the process improved the awareness and engagement in actively enhancing worker safety and health.",
keywords = "Fire service, Risk management, Safety and health",
author = "Poplin, {Gerald S.} and Keshia Pollack and Stephanie Griffin and Virginia Day-Nash and Peate, {Wayne F.} and Ed Nied and John Gulotta and Burgess, {Jefferey L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-015-1675-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Establishing a proactive safety and health risk management system in the fire service

AU - Poplin, Gerald S.

AU - Pollack, Keshia

AU - Griffin, Stephanie

AU - Day-Nash, Virginia

AU - Peate, Wayne F.

AU - Nied, Ed

AU - Gulotta, John

AU - Burgess, Jefferey L.

PY - 2015/4/19

Y1 - 2015/4/19

N2 - Background: Formalized risk management (RM) is an internationally accepted process for reducing hazards in the workplace, with defined steps including hazard scoping, risk assessment, and implementation of controls, all within an iterative process. While required for all industry in the European Union and widely used elsewhere, the United States maintains a compliance-based regulatory structure, rather than one based on systematic, risk-based methodologies. Firefighting is a hazardous profession, with high injury, illness, and fatality rates compared with other occupations, and implementation of RM programs has the potential to greatly improve firefighter safety and health; however, no descriptions of RM implementation are in the peer-reviewed literature for the North American fire service. Methods: In this paper we describe the steps used to design and implement the RM process in a moderately-sized fire department, with particular focus on prioritizing and managing injury hazards during patient transport, fireground, and physical exercise procedures. Hazard scoping and formalized risk assessments are described, in addition to the identification of participatory-led injury control strategies. Process evaluation methods were conducted to primarily assess the feasibility of voluntarily instituting the RM approach within the fire service setting. Results: The RM process was well accepted by the fire department and led to development of 45 hazard specific-interventions. Qualitative data documenting the implementation of the RM process revealed that participants emphasized the: value of the RM process, especially the participatory bottom-up approach; usefulness of the RM process for breaking down tasks to identify potential risks; and potential of RM for reducing firefighter injury. Conclusions: As implemented, this risk-based approach used to identify and manage occupational hazards and risks was successful and is deemed feasible for U.S. (and other) fire services. While several barriers and challenges do exist in the implementation of any intervention such as this, recommendations for adopting the process are provided. Additional work will be performed to determine the effectiveness of select controls strategies that were implemented; however participants throughout the organizational structure perceived the RM process to be of high utility while researchers also found the process improved the awareness and engagement in actively enhancing worker safety and health.

AB - Background: Formalized risk management (RM) is an internationally accepted process for reducing hazards in the workplace, with defined steps including hazard scoping, risk assessment, and implementation of controls, all within an iterative process. While required for all industry in the European Union and widely used elsewhere, the United States maintains a compliance-based regulatory structure, rather than one based on systematic, risk-based methodologies. Firefighting is a hazardous profession, with high injury, illness, and fatality rates compared with other occupations, and implementation of RM programs has the potential to greatly improve firefighter safety and health; however, no descriptions of RM implementation are in the peer-reviewed literature for the North American fire service. Methods: In this paper we describe the steps used to design and implement the RM process in a moderately-sized fire department, with particular focus on prioritizing and managing injury hazards during patient transport, fireground, and physical exercise procedures. Hazard scoping and formalized risk assessments are described, in addition to the identification of participatory-led injury control strategies. Process evaluation methods were conducted to primarily assess the feasibility of voluntarily instituting the RM approach within the fire service setting. Results: The RM process was well accepted by the fire department and led to development of 45 hazard specific-interventions. Qualitative data documenting the implementation of the RM process revealed that participants emphasized the: value of the RM process, especially the participatory bottom-up approach; usefulness of the RM process for breaking down tasks to identify potential risks; and potential of RM for reducing firefighter injury. Conclusions: As implemented, this risk-based approach used to identify and manage occupational hazards and risks was successful and is deemed feasible for U.S. (and other) fire services. While several barriers and challenges do exist in the implementation of any intervention such as this, recommendations for adopting the process are provided. Additional work will be performed to determine the effectiveness of select controls strategies that were implemented; however participants throughout the organizational structure perceived the RM process to be of high utility while researchers also found the process improved the awareness and engagement in actively enhancing worker safety and health.

KW - Fire service

KW - Risk management

KW - Safety and health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928329347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928329347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-015-1675-8

DO - 10.1186/s12889-015-1675-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 25909357

AN - SCOPUS:84928329347

VL - 15

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

M1 - 407

ER -