Essential variables for reporting research studies on fetal growth restriction: a Delphi consensus

A. Khalil, S. J. Gordijn, I. M. Beune, K. Wynia, W. Ganzevoort, F. Figueras, J. Kingdom, N. Marlow, A. T. Papageorghiou, N. Sebire, J. Zeitlin, Ahmet Baschat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine, by expert consensus using a Delphi procedure, a minimum reporting set of study variables for fetal growth restriction (FGR) research studies. Methods: A panel of experts, identified based on their publication record as lead or senior author of studies on FGR, was asked to select a set of essential reporting study parameters from a literature-based list of variables, utilizing the Delphi consensus methodology. Responses were collected in four consecutive rounds by online questionnaires presented to the panelists through a unique token-secured link for each round. The experts were asked to rate the importance of each parameter on a five-point Likert scale. Variables were selected in the three first rounds based on a 70% threshold for agreement on the Likert-scale scoring. In the final round, retained parameters were categorized as essential (to be reported in all FGR studies) or recommended (important but not mandatory). Results: Of the 100 invited experts, 87 agreed to participate and of these 62 (71%) completed all four rounds. Agreement was reached for 16 essential and 30 recommended parameters including maternal characteristics, prenatal investigations, prenatal management and pregnancy/neonatal outcomes. Essential parameters included hypertensive complication in the current pregnancy, smoking, parity, maternal age, fetal abdominal circumference, estimated fetal weight, umbilical artery Doppler (pulsatility index and end-diastolic flow), fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler, indications for intervention, pregnancy outcome (live birth, stillbirth or neonatal death), gestational age at delivery, birth weight, birth-weight centile, mode of delivery and 5-min Apgar score. Conclusions: We present a list of essential and recommended parameters that characterize FGR independent of study hypotheses. Uniform reporting of these variables in prospective clinical research is expected to improve data quality, study consistency and ultimately our understanding of FGR.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)609-614
Number of pages6
JournalUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume53
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Fetal Development
Consensus
Research
Pregnancy Outcome
Birth Weight
Fetal Weight
Umbilical Arteries
Stillbirth
Apgar Score
Maternal Age
Middle Cerebral Artery
Live Birth
Parity
Gestational Age
Publications
Smoking
Mothers
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Delphi consensus
  • fetal growth restriction
  • research studies
  • variables

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Essential variables for reporting research studies on fetal growth restriction : a Delphi consensus. / Khalil, A.; Gordijn, S. J.; Beune, I. M.; Wynia, K.; Ganzevoort, W.; Figueras, F.; Kingdom, J.; Marlow, N.; Papageorghiou, A. T.; Sebire, N.; Zeitlin, J.; Baschat, Ahmet.

In: Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 53, No. 5, 01.05.2019, p. 609-614.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khalil, A, Gordijn, SJ, Beune, IM, Wynia, K, Ganzevoort, W, Figueras, F, Kingdom, J, Marlow, N, Papageorghiou, AT, Sebire, N, Zeitlin, J & Baschat, A 2019, 'Essential variables for reporting research studies on fetal growth restriction: a Delphi consensus', Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 609-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19196
Khalil, A. ; Gordijn, S. J. ; Beune, I. M. ; Wynia, K. ; Ganzevoort, W. ; Figueras, F. ; Kingdom, J. ; Marlow, N. ; Papageorghiou, A. T. ; Sebire, N. ; Zeitlin, J. ; Baschat, Ahmet. / Essential variables for reporting research studies on fetal growth restriction : a Delphi consensus. In: Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019 ; Vol. 53, No. 5. pp. 609-614.
@article{88c55f6ff4174c489fcedc8cb6bb7a4f,
title = "Essential variables for reporting research studies on fetal growth restriction: a Delphi consensus",
abstract = "Objective: To determine, by expert consensus using a Delphi procedure, a minimum reporting set of study variables for fetal growth restriction (FGR) research studies. Methods: A panel of experts, identified based on their publication record as lead or senior author of studies on FGR, was asked to select a set of essential reporting study parameters from a literature-based list of variables, utilizing the Delphi consensus methodology. Responses were collected in four consecutive rounds by online questionnaires presented to the panelists through a unique token-secured link for each round. The experts were asked to rate the importance of each parameter on a five-point Likert scale. Variables were selected in the three first rounds based on a 70{\%} threshold for agreement on the Likert-scale scoring. In the final round, retained parameters were categorized as essential (to be reported in all FGR studies) or recommended (important but not mandatory). Results: Of the 100 invited experts, 87 agreed to participate and of these 62 (71{\%}) completed all four rounds. Agreement was reached for 16 essential and 30 recommended parameters including maternal characteristics, prenatal investigations, prenatal management and pregnancy/neonatal outcomes. Essential parameters included hypertensive complication in the current pregnancy, smoking, parity, maternal age, fetal abdominal circumference, estimated fetal weight, umbilical artery Doppler (pulsatility index and end-diastolic flow), fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler, indications for intervention, pregnancy outcome (live birth, stillbirth or neonatal death), gestational age at delivery, birth weight, birth-weight centile, mode of delivery and 5-min Apgar score. Conclusions: We present a list of essential and recommended parameters that characterize FGR independent of study hypotheses. Uniform reporting of these variables in prospective clinical research is expected to improve data quality, study consistency and ultimately our understanding of FGR.",
keywords = "Delphi consensus, fetal growth restriction, research studies, variables",
author = "A. Khalil and Gordijn, {S. J.} and Beune, {I. M.} and K. Wynia and W. Ganzevoort and F. Figueras and J. Kingdom and N. Marlow and Papageorghiou, {A. T.} and N. Sebire and J. Zeitlin and Ahmet Baschat",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/uog.19196",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "609--614",
journal = "Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0960-7692",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Essential variables for reporting research studies on fetal growth restriction

T2 - a Delphi consensus

AU - Khalil, A.

AU - Gordijn, S. J.

AU - Beune, I. M.

AU - Wynia, K.

AU - Ganzevoort, W.

AU - Figueras, F.

AU - Kingdom, J.

AU - Marlow, N.

AU - Papageorghiou, A. T.

AU - Sebire, N.

AU - Zeitlin, J.

AU - Baschat, Ahmet

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Objective: To determine, by expert consensus using a Delphi procedure, a minimum reporting set of study variables for fetal growth restriction (FGR) research studies. Methods: A panel of experts, identified based on their publication record as lead or senior author of studies on FGR, was asked to select a set of essential reporting study parameters from a literature-based list of variables, utilizing the Delphi consensus methodology. Responses were collected in four consecutive rounds by online questionnaires presented to the panelists through a unique token-secured link for each round. The experts were asked to rate the importance of each parameter on a five-point Likert scale. Variables were selected in the three first rounds based on a 70% threshold for agreement on the Likert-scale scoring. In the final round, retained parameters were categorized as essential (to be reported in all FGR studies) or recommended (important but not mandatory). Results: Of the 100 invited experts, 87 agreed to participate and of these 62 (71%) completed all four rounds. Agreement was reached for 16 essential and 30 recommended parameters including maternal characteristics, prenatal investigations, prenatal management and pregnancy/neonatal outcomes. Essential parameters included hypertensive complication in the current pregnancy, smoking, parity, maternal age, fetal abdominal circumference, estimated fetal weight, umbilical artery Doppler (pulsatility index and end-diastolic flow), fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler, indications for intervention, pregnancy outcome (live birth, stillbirth or neonatal death), gestational age at delivery, birth weight, birth-weight centile, mode of delivery and 5-min Apgar score. Conclusions: We present a list of essential and recommended parameters that characterize FGR independent of study hypotheses. Uniform reporting of these variables in prospective clinical research is expected to improve data quality, study consistency and ultimately our understanding of FGR.

AB - Objective: To determine, by expert consensus using a Delphi procedure, a minimum reporting set of study variables for fetal growth restriction (FGR) research studies. Methods: A panel of experts, identified based on their publication record as lead or senior author of studies on FGR, was asked to select a set of essential reporting study parameters from a literature-based list of variables, utilizing the Delphi consensus methodology. Responses were collected in four consecutive rounds by online questionnaires presented to the panelists through a unique token-secured link for each round. The experts were asked to rate the importance of each parameter on a five-point Likert scale. Variables were selected in the three first rounds based on a 70% threshold for agreement on the Likert-scale scoring. In the final round, retained parameters were categorized as essential (to be reported in all FGR studies) or recommended (important but not mandatory). Results: Of the 100 invited experts, 87 agreed to participate and of these 62 (71%) completed all four rounds. Agreement was reached for 16 essential and 30 recommended parameters including maternal characteristics, prenatal investigations, prenatal management and pregnancy/neonatal outcomes. Essential parameters included hypertensive complication in the current pregnancy, smoking, parity, maternal age, fetal abdominal circumference, estimated fetal weight, umbilical artery Doppler (pulsatility index and end-diastolic flow), fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler, indications for intervention, pregnancy outcome (live birth, stillbirth or neonatal death), gestational age at delivery, birth weight, birth-weight centile, mode of delivery and 5-min Apgar score. Conclusions: We present a list of essential and recommended parameters that characterize FGR independent of study hypotheses. Uniform reporting of these variables in prospective clinical research is expected to improve data quality, study consistency and ultimately our understanding of FGR.

KW - Delphi consensus

KW - fetal growth restriction

KW - research studies

KW - variables

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061755680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061755680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/uog.19196

DO - 10.1002/uog.19196

M3 - Article

C2 - 30125411

AN - SCOPUS:85061755680

VL - 53

SP - 609

EP - 614

JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0960-7692

IS - 5

ER -