ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: General considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests

Allan L. Coates, Jack Wanger, Donald W. Cockcroft, Bruce H. Culver, Kai Håkon Carlsen, Zuzana Diamant, Gail Gauvreau, Graham L. Hall, Teal S. Hallstrand, Ildiko Horvath, Frans H.C. De Jongh, Guy Joos, David A. Kaminsky, Beth L. Laube, Joerg D. Leuppi, Peter J. Sterk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

108 Scopus citations

Abstract

This international task force report updates general considerations for bronchial challenge testing and the performance of the methacholine challenge test. There are notable changes from prior recommendations in order to accommodate newer delivery devices. Rather than basing the test result upon a methacholine concentration (provocative concentration (PC20) causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)), the new recommendations base the result upon the delivered dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (provocative dose (PD20)). This end-point allows comparable results from different devices or protocols, thus any suitable nebuliser or dosimeter may be used, so long as the delivery characteristics are known. Inhalation may be by tidal breathing using a breath-actuated or continuous nebuliser for 1 min (or more), or by a dosimeter with a suitable breath count. Tests requiring maximal inhalations to total lung capacity are not recommended because the bronchoprotective effect of a deep breath reduces the sensitivity of the test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1601526
JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal
Volume49
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: General considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this