ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing

General considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests

Allan L. Coates, Jack Wanger, Donald W. Cockcroft, Bruce H. Culver, Kai Håkon Carlsen, Zuzana Diamant, Gail Gauvreau, Graham L. Hall, Teal S. Hallstrand, Ildiko Horvath, Frans H.C. De Jongh, Guy Joos, David A. Kaminsky, Beth L Laube, Joerg D. Leuppi, Peter J. Sterk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This international task force report updates general considerations for bronchial challenge testing and the performance of the methacholine challenge test. There are notable changes from prior recommendations in order to accommodate newer delivery devices. Rather than basing the test result upon a methacholine concentration (provocative concentration (PC20) causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)), the new recommendations base the result upon the delivered dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (provocative dose (PD20)). This end-point allows comparable results from different devices or protocols, thus any suitable nebuliser or dosimeter may be used, so long as the delivery characteristics are known. Inhalation may be by tidal breathing using a breath-actuated or continuous nebuliser for 1 min (or more), or by a dosimeter with a suitable breath count. Tests requiring maximal inhalations to total lung capacity are not recommended because the bronchoprotective effect of a deep breath reduces the sensitivity of the test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1601526
JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal
Volume49
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Methacholine Chloride
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Forced Expiratory Volume
Inhalation
Total Lung Capacity
Equipment and Supplies
Advisory Committees
Respiration
Radiation Dosimeters

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Coates, A. L., Wanger, J., Cockcroft, D. W., Culver, B. H., Carlsen, K. H., Diamant, Z., ... Sterk, P. J. (2017). ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: General considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests. European Respiratory Journal, 49(5), [1601526]. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01526-2016

ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing : General considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests. / Coates, Allan L.; Wanger, Jack; Cockcroft, Donald W.; Culver, Bruce H.; Carlsen, Kai Håkon; Diamant, Zuzana; Gauvreau, Gail; Hall, Graham L.; Hallstrand, Teal S.; Horvath, Ildiko; De Jongh, Frans H.C.; Joos, Guy; Kaminsky, David A.; Laube, Beth L; Leuppi, Joerg D.; Sterk, Peter J.

In: European Respiratory Journal, Vol. 49, No. 5, 1601526, 01.05.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coates, AL, Wanger, J, Cockcroft, DW, Culver, BH, Carlsen, KH, Diamant, Z, Gauvreau, G, Hall, GL, Hallstrand, TS, Horvath, I, De Jongh, FHC, Joos, G, Kaminsky, DA, Laube, BL, Leuppi, JD & Sterk, PJ 2017, 'ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: General considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests', European Respiratory Journal, vol. 49, no. 5, 1601526. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01526-2016
Coates, Allan L. ; Wanger, Jack ; Cockcroft, Donald W. ; Culver, Bruce H. ; Carlsen, Kai Håkon ; Diamant, Zuzana ; Gauvreau, Gail ; Hall, Graham L. ; Hallstrand, Teal S. ; Horvath, Ildiko ; De Jongh, Frans H.C. ; Joos, Guy ; Kaminsky, David A. ; Laube, Beth L ; Leuppi, Joerg D. ; Sterk, Peter J. / ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing : General considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests. In: European Respiratory Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 49, No. 5.
@article{18ea1167b26545cebf3721ae7f97802c,
title = "ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: General considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests",
abstract = "This international task force report updates general considerations for bronchial challenge testing and the performance of the methacholine challenge test. There are notable changes from prior recommendations in order to accommodate newer delivery devices. Rather than basing the test result upon a methacholine concentration (provocative concentration (PC20) causing a 20{\%} fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)), the new recommendations base the result upon the delivered dose of methacholine causing a 20{\%} fall in FEV1 (provocative dose (PD20)). This end-point allows comparable results from different devices or protocols, thus any suitable nebuliser or dosimeter may be used, so long as the delivery characteristics are known. Inhalation may be by tidal breathing using a breath-actuated or continuous nebuliser for 1 min (or more), or by a dosimeter with a suitable breath count. Tests requiring maximal inhalations to total lung capacity are not recommended because the bronchoprotective effect of a deep breath reduces the sensitivity of the test.",
author = "Coates, {Allan L.} and Jack Wanger and Cockcroft, {Donald W.} and Culver, {Bruce H.} and Carlsen, {Kai H{\aa}kon} and Zuzana Diamant and Gail Gauvreau and Hall, {Graham L.} and Hallstrand, {Teal S.} and Ildiko Horvath and {De Jongh}, {Frans H.C.} and Guy Joos and Kaminsky, {David A.} and Laube, {Beth L} and Leuppi, {Joerg D.} and Sterk, {Peter J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1183/13993003.01526-2016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
journal = "European Respiratory Journal, Supplement",
issn = "0903-1936",
publisher = "European Respiratory Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing

T2 - General considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests

AU - Coates, Allan L.

AU - Wanger, Jack

AU - Cockcroft, Donald W.

AU - Culver, Bruce H.

AU - Carlsen, Kai Håkon

AU - Diamant, Zuzana

AU - Gauvreau, Gail

AU - Hall, Graham L.

AU - Hallstrand, Teal S.

AU - Horvath, Ildiko

AU - De Jongh, Frans H.C.

AU - Joos, Guy

AU - Kaminsky, David A.

AU - Laube, Beth L

AU - Leuppi, Joerg D.

AU - Sterk, Peter J.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - This international task force report updates general considerations for bronchial challenge testing and the performance of the methacholine challenge test. There are notable changes from prior recommendations in order to accommodate newer delivery devices. Rather than basing the test result upon a methacholine concentration (provocative concentration (PC20) causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)), the new recommendations base the result upon the delivered dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (provocative dose (PD20)). This end-point allows comparable results from different devices or protocols, thus any suitable nebuliser or dosimeter may be used, so long as the delivery characteristics are known. Inhalation may be by tidal breathing using a breath-actuated or continuous nebuliser for 1 min (or more), or by a dosimeter with a suitable breath count. Tests requiring maximal inhalations to total lung capacity are not recommended because the bronchoprotective effect of a deep breath reduces the sensitivity of the test.

AB - This international task force report updates general considerations for bronchial challenge testing and the performance of the methacholine challenge test. There are notable changes from prior recommendations in order to accommodate newer delivery devices. Rather than basing the test result upon a methacholine concentration (provocative concentration (PC20) causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)), the new recommendations base the result upon the delivered dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (provocative dose (PD20)). This end-point allows comparable results from different devices or protocols, thus any suitable nebuliser or dosimeter may be used, so long as the delivery characteristics are known. Inhalation may be by tidal breathing using a breath-actuated or continuous nebuliser for 1 min (or more), or by a dosimeter with a suitable breath count. Tests requiring maximal inhalations to total lung capacity are not recommended because the bronchoprotective effect of a deep breath reduces the sensitivity of the test.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019161297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019161297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1183/13993003.01526-2016

DO - 10.1183/13993003.01526-2016

M3 - Article

VL - 49

JO - European Respiratory Journal, Supplement

JF - European Respiratory Journal, Supplement

SN - 0903-1936

IS - 5

M1 - 1601526

ER -