Error in estimating area-level air pollution exposures for epidemiology

Joshua P. Keller, Roger Peng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In air pollution epidemiology, measurements of relevant exposure concentrations are typically made at point locations, resulting in spatial misalignment between the exposure data and health outcomes aggregated at the area level. To obtain values that match the spatial units of the health data, observations can be averaged directly or prediction models developed. We present a framework for evaluating the error in aggregating exposure concentrations to the area unit. We present estimators of mean squared error that can be used for model selection. We find that exposure prediction models, even when misspecified, outperform monitor averages in settings with realistic numbers of monitors and that important reductions in error of the health effect estimate can be obtained when restricting to areas with a monitor. In an analysis of long-term particulate matter concentrations across the United States, we estimated the error of the prediction model approach to be less than that of the monitor averaging approach on average across counties. We present health effect estimates about particulate matter exposure and pediatric asthma morbidity in the Medicaid population using each approach. Our findings support the use of a prediction model for estimating area-wide averages, even when restricting to areas that contain a monitor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere2573
JournalEnvironmetrics
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

pollution exposure
Air Pollution
Epidemiology
epidemiology
Monitor
atmospheric pollution
Prediction Model
Health
Particulate Matter
prediction
particulate matter
Asthma
Point Location
Unit
Pediatrics
Morbidity
asthma
Misalignment
morbidity
Mean Squared Error

Keywords

  • change of support
  • exposure prediction
  • measurement error
  • particulate matter
  • spatial statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Ecological Modeling

Cite this

Error in estimating area-level air pollution exposures for epidemiology. / Keller, Joshua P.; Peng, Roger.

In: Environmetrics, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{880b6043e54a43588366c910ac7e93b8,
title = "Error in estimating area-level air pollution exposures for epidemiology",
abstract = "In air pollution epidemiology, measurements of relevant exposure concentrations are typically made at point locations, resulting in spatial misalignment between the exposure data and health outcomes aggregated at the area level. To obtain values that match the spatial units of the health data, observations can be averaged directly or prediction models developed. We present a framework for evaluating the error in aggregating exposure concentrations to the area unit. We present estimators of mean squared error that can be used for model selection. We find that exposure prediction models, even when misspecified, outperform monitor averages in settings with realistic numbers of monitors and that important reductions in error of the health effect estimate can be obtained when restricting to areas with a monitor. In an analysis of long-term particulate matter concentrations across the United States, we estimated the error of the prediction model approach to be less than that of the monitor averaging approach on average across counties. We present health effect estimates about particulate matter exposure and pediatric asthma morbidity in the Medicaid population using each approach. Our findings support the use of a prediction model for estimating area-wide averages, even when restricting to areas that contain a monitor.",
keywords = "change of support, exposure prediction, measurement error, particulate matter, spatial statistics",
author = "Keller, {Joshua P.} and Roger Peng",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/env.2573",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Environmetrics",
issn = "1180-4009",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Error in estimating area-level air pollution exposures for epidemiology

AU - Keller, Joshua P.

AU - Peng, Roger

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In air pollution epidemiology, measurements of relevant exposure concentrations are typically made at point locations, resulting in spatial misalignment between the exposure data and health outcomes aggregated at the area level. To obtain values that match the spatial units of the health data, observations can be averaged directly or prediction models developed. We present a framework for evaluating the error in aggregating exposure concentrations to the area unit. We present estimators of mean squared error that can be used for model selection. We find that exposure prediction models, even when misspecified, outperform monitor averages in settings with realistic numbers of monitors and that important reductions in error of the health effect estimate can be obtained when restricting to areas with a monitor. In an analysis of long-term particulate matter concentrations across the United States, we estimated the error of the prediction model approach to be less than that of the monitor averaging approach on average across counties. We present health effect estimates about particulate matter exposure and pediatric asthma morbidity in the Medicaid population using each approach. Our findings support the use of a prediction model for estimating area-wide averages, even when restricting to areas that contain a monitor.

AB - In air pollution epidemiology, measurements of relevant exposure concentrations are typically made at point locations, resulting in spatial misalignment between the exposure data and health outcomes aggregated at the area level. To obtain values that match the spatial units of the health data, observations can be averaged directly or prediction models developed. We present a framework for evaluating the error in aggregating exposure concentrations to the area unit. We present estimators of mean squared error that can be used for model selection. We find that exposure prediction models, even when misspecified, outperform monitor averages in settings with realistic numbers of monitors and that important reductions in error of the health effect estimate can be obtained when restricting to areas with a monitor. In an analysis of long-term particulate matter concentrations across the United States, we estimated the error of the prediction model approach to be less than that of the monitor averaging approach on average across counties. We present health effect estimates about particulate matter exposure and pediatric asthma morbidity in the Medicaid population using each approach. Our findings support the use of a prediction model for estimating area-wide averages, even when restricting to areas that contain a monitor.

KW - change of support

KW - exposure prediction

KW - measurement error

KW - particulate matter

KW - spatial statistics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065323944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065323944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/env.2573

DO - 10.1002/env.2573

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065323944

JO - Environmetrics

JF - Environmetrics

SN - 1180-4009

M1 - e2573

ER -