Erratum to: The art of cardiovascular risk assessment (Clinical Cardiology, (2018), 41, 5, (677-684), 10.1002/clc.22930)

Jay Khambhati, Marc Allard-Ratick, Devinder Dhindsa, Suegene Lee, John Chen, Pratik B. Sandesara, Wesley O'Neal, Arshed A. Quyyumi, Nathan D. Wong, Roger S. Blumenthal, Laurence S. Sperling

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

The authors would like to correct two sentences in section 4.2. They should read: Among those deemed reasonable to treat based on ASCVD guidelines (10-year risk, 5%–20%), 50% had a CAC score of 0. Furthermore, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) recommends consideration of a CAC score in those with a risk score of 5% to 20% and selectively in those with lower predicted risk who have a family history of premature ASCVD or other risk conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1111
Number of pages1
JournalClinical Cardiology
Volume41
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to: The art of cardiovascular risk assessment (Clinical Cardiology, (2018), 41, 5, (677-684), 10.1002/clc.22930)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this