Epidural lysis of adhesions

Frank Lee, David E. Jamison, Robert W. Hurley, Steven Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As our population ages and the rate of spine surgery continues to rise, the use epidural lysis of adhesions (LOA) has emerged as a popular treatment to treat spinal stenosis and failed back surgery syndrome. There is moderate evidence that percutaneous LOA is more effective than conventional ESI for both failed back surgery syndrome, spinal stenosis, and lumbar radiculopathy. For cervical HNP, cervical stenosis and mechanical pain not associated with nerve root involvement, the evidence is anecdotal. The benefits of LOA stem from a combination of factors to include the high volumes administered and the use of hypertonic saline. Hyaluronidase has been shown in most, but not all studies to improve treatment outcomes. Although infrequent, complications are more likely to occur after epidural LOA than after conventional epidural steroid injections.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-15
Number of pages13
JournalKorean Journal of Pain
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Spinal Stenosis
Epidural Injections
Radiculopathy
Hyaluronoglucosaminidase
Pathologic Constriction
Spine
Steroids
Pain
Population
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Epidural adhesiolysis
  • Epidural lysis of adhesions
  • Epidural neuroplasty
  • Epiduroscopy
  • Failed back surgery syndrome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Epidural lysis of adhesions. / Lee, Frank; Jamison, David E.; Hurley, Robert W.; Cohen, Steven.

In: Korean Journal of Pain, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 3-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, F, Jamison, DE, Hurley, RW & Cohen, S 2014, 'Epidural lysis of adhesions', Korean Journal of Pain, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2014.27.1.3
Lee, Frank ; Jamison, David E. ; Hurley, Robert W. ; Cohen, Steven. / Epidural lysis of adhesions. In: Korean Journal of Pain. 2014 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 3-15.
@article{12242e2bd59b4d9492a497629c0f08f5,
title = "Epidural lysis of adhesions",
abstract = "As our population ages and the rate of spine surgery continues to rise, the use epidural lysis of adhesions (LOA) has emerged as a popular treatment to treat spinal stenosis and failed back surgery syndrome. There is moderate evidence that percutaneous LOA is more effective than conventional ESI for both failed back surgery syndrome, spinal stenosis, and lumbar radiculopathy. For cervical HNP, cervical stenosis and mechanical pain not associated with nerve root involvement, the evidence is anecdotal. The benefits of LOA stem from a combination of factors to include the high volumes administered and the use of hypertonic saline. Hyaluronidase has been shown in most, but not all studies to improve treatment outcomes. Although infrequent, complications are more likely to occur after epidural LOA than after conventional epidural steroid injections.",
keywords = "Epidural adhesiolysis, Epidural lysis of adhesions, Epidural neuroplasty, Epiduroscopy, Failed back surgery syndrome",
author = "Frank Lee and Jamison, {David E.} and Hurley, {Robert W.} and Steven Cohen",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3344/kjp.2014.27.1.3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "3--15",
journal = "Korean Journal of Pain",
issn = "2005-9159",
publisher = "The Korean Pain Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epidural lysis of adhesions

AU - Lee, Frank

AU - Jamison, David E.

AU - Hurley, Robert W.

AU - Cohen, Steven

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - As our population ages and the rate of spine surgery continues to rise, the use epidural lysis of adhesions (LOA) has emerged as a popular treatment to treat spinal stenosis and failed back surgery syndrome. There is moderate evidence that percutaneous LOA is more effective than conventional ESI for both failed back surgery syndrome, spinal stenosis, and lumbar radiculopathy. For cervical HNP, cervical stenosis and mechanical pain not associated with nerve root involvement, the evidence is anecdotal. The benefits of LOA stem from a combination of factors to include the high volumes administered and the use of hypertonic saline. Hyaluronidase has been shown in most, but not all studies to improve treatment outcomes. Although infrequent, complications are more likely to occur after epidural LOA than after conventional epidural steroid injections.

AB - As our population ages and the rate of spine surgery continues to rise, the use epidural lysis of adhesions (LOA) has emerged as a popular treatment to treat spinal stenosis and failed back surgery syndrome. There is moderate evidence that percutaneous LOA is more effective than conventional ESI for both failed back surgery syndrome, spinal stenosis, and lumbar radiculopathy. For cervical HNP, cervical stenosis and mechanical pain not associated with nerve root involvement, the evidence is anecdotal. The benefits of LOA stem from a combination of factors to include the high volumes administered and the use of hypertonic saline. Hyaluronidase has been shown in most, but not all studies to improve treatment outcomes. Although infrequent, complications are more likely to occur after epidural LOA than after conventional epidural steroid injections.

KW - Epidural adhesiolysis

KW - Epidural lysis of adhesions

KW - Epidural neuroplasty

KW - Epiduroscopy

KW - Failed back surgery syndrome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891821167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891821167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.1.3

DO - 10.3344/kjp.2014.27.1.3

M3 - Article

C2 - 24478895

AN - SCOPUS:84891821167

VL - 27

SP - 3

EP - 15

JO - Korean Journal of Pain

JF - Korean Journal of Pain

SN - 2005-9159

IS - 1

ER -