Características epidemiológicas do suicídio no Rio Grande do Sul

Translated title of the contribution: Epidemiological aspects of suicide in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Stela Nazareth Meneghel, Cesar Gomes Victora, Neice Müller Xavier Faria, Lenine Alves de Carvalho, João Werner Falk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations


Objective. To describe epidemiological aspects of suicide mortality in a 10-year time series. Methods. Suicide deaths reported in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil, were put together as historical time series based on data from the Ministry of Health Mortality Reporting System for the period 1980 to 1999. Suicides were grouped according to the WHO criteria and analyzed using standard demographic variables. Results. Suicide rates (proportional mortality and mortality rates) in RS during the study period were the highest in Brazil. The standardized rates grew from around 9 per 100,000 in the 1980s to 11 per 100,000 in 1999. This increase in mortality was attributed mainly to male mortality rates that grew from 14 per 100, 000 to the current 20 per 100,000. The male: female ratio increased from 3 to 5. The highest ratios were seen among the elderly although this ratio has been increasing in young adults as well. Widows, widowers and farmers/fishers had the highest mortality rates. Conclusions. The study highlights suicide as a collective health problem in RS and shows aspects that could contribute to preventive action.

Translated title of the contributionEpidemiological aspects of suicide in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Original languagePortuguese
Pages (from-to)804-810
Number of pages7
JournalRevista de Saude Publica
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2004
Externally publishedYes


  • Mortality
  • Mortality rate
  • Statistics numeric data
  • Suicide

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health


Dive into the research topics of 'Epidemiological aspects of suicide in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this