Epidemiological analysis of the quality of HIV sero-surveillance in the world: How well do we track the epidemic?

Neff Walker, Jesus M. Garcia-Calleja, Laura Heaton, Emil Asamoah-Odei, Gilles Poumerol, Stefano Lazzari, Peter D. Ghys, Bernhard Schwartländer, Karen A. Stanecki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this paper was to analyse the quality of HIV/AIDS sentinel surveillance systems in countries and the resulting quality of the data used to make estimates of HIV/AIDS prevalence and mortality. Methods: Available data on sero-surveillance of HIV/AIDS in countries were compiled in the process of making the end of 1999 estimates of HIV/AIDS. These data came primarily from the HIV/AIDS Surveillance Database developed by the United States Census Bureau, from a database maintained by the European Centre for the Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS and all country reports on sentinel surveillance that had been provided to World Health Organization or UNAIDS. Procedures were developed to score quality of surveillance systems based on four dimensions of quality: timeliness and frequency; appropriateness of groups; consistency of sites over time; and coverage provided by the system. In total, the surveillance systems from 167 countries were analysed. Results: Forty-seven of the 167 countries whose surveillance systems were rated were judged to have fully implemented sentinel surveillance systems; 51 were judged to have systems that had some or most aspects of a good HIV surveillance system in place and 69 were rated as having poorly functioning or non-existent surveillance systems. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that the quality of HIV surveillance varies considerably. The majority of countries most affected by HIV/AIDS have systems that are providing sufficient sero-prevalence data for tracking the epidemic and making reasonable estimates of HIV prevalence. However, many countries have poor systems and strengthening these is an urgent priority.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1545-1554
Number of pages10
JournalAIDS
Volume15
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 17 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

HIV
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Sentinel Surveillance
Epidemiological Monitoring
Databases
Censuses
Mortality

Keywords

  • AIDS
  • Data quality
  • Estimates of HIV/AIDS
  • HIV
  • Surveillance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Cite this

Walker, N., Garcia-Calleja, J. M., Heaton, L., Asamoah-Odei, E., Poumerol, G., Lazzari, S., ... Stanecki, K. A. (2001). Epidemiological analysis of the quality of HIV sero-surveillance in the world: How well do we track the epidemic? AIDS, 15(12), 1545-1554. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200108170-00012

Epidemiological analysis of the quality of HIV sero-surveillance in the world : How well do we track the epidemic? / Walker, Neff; Garcia-Calleja, Jesus M.; Heaton, Laura; Asamoah-Odei, Emil; Poumerol, Gilles; Lazzari, Stefano; Ghys, Peter D.; Schwartländer, Bernhard; Stanecki, Karen A.

In: AIDS, Vol. 15, No. 12, 17.08.2001, p. 1545-1554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Walker, N, Garcia-Calleja, JM, Heaton, L, Asamoah-Odei, E, Poumerol, G, Lazzari, S, Ghys, PD, Schwartländer, B & Stanecki, KA 2001, 'Epidemiological analysis of the quality of HIV sero-surveillance in the world: How well do we track the epidemic?', AIDS, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1545-1554. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200108170-00012
Walker, Neff ; Garcia-Calleja, Jesus M. ; Heaton, Laura ; Asamoah-Odei, Emil ; Poumerol, Gilles ; Lazzari, Stefano ; Ghys, Peter D. ; Schwartländer, Bernhard ; Stanecki, Karen A. / Epidemiological analysis of the quality of HIV sero-surveillance in the world : How well do we track the epidemic?. In: AIDS. 2001 ; Vol. 15, No. 12. pp. 1545-1554.
@article{ca541d50e95f4bb4bb84314bcd5d97f2,
title = "Epidemiological analysis of the quality of HIV sero-surveillance in the world: How well do we track the epidemic?",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this paper was to analyse the quality of HIV/AIDS sentinel surveillance systems in countries and the resulting quality of the data used to make estimates of HIV/AIDS prevalence and mortality. Methods: Available data on sero-surveillance of HIV/AIDS in countries were compiled in the process of making the end of 1999 estimates of HIV/AIDS. These data came primarily from the HIV/AIDS Surveillance Database developed by the United States Census Bureau, from a database maintained by the European Centre for the Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS and all country reports on sentinel surveillance that had been provided to World Health Organization or UNAIDS. Procedures were developed to score quality of surveillance systems based on four dimensions of quality: timeliness and frequency; appropriateness of groups; consistency of sites over time; and coverage provided by the system. In total, the surveillance systems from 167 countries were analysed. Results: Forty-seven of the 167 countries whose surveillance systems were rated were judged to have fully implemented sentinel surveillance systems; 51 were judged to have systems that had some or most aspects of a good HIV surveillance system in place and 69 were rated as having poorly functioning or non-existent surveillance systems. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that the quality of HIV surveillance varies considerably. The majority of countries most affected by HIV/AIDS have systems that are providing sufficient sero-prevalence data for tracking the epidemic and making reasonable estimates of HIV prevalence. However, many countries have poor systems and strengthening these is an urgent priority.",
keywords = "AIDS, Data quality, Estimates of HIV/AIDS, HIV, Surveillance",
author = "Neff Walker and Garcia-Calleja, {Jesus M.} and Laura Heaton and Emil Asamoah-Odei and Gilles Poumerol and Stefano Lazzari and Ghys, {Peter D.} and Bernhard Schwartl{\"a}nder and Stanecki, {Karen A.}",
year = "2001",
month = "8",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1097/00002030-200108170-00012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1545--1554",
journal = "AIDS",
issn = "0269-9370",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epidemiological analysis of the quality of HIV sero-surveillance in the world

T2 - How well do we track the epidemic?

AU - Walker, Neff

AU - Garcia-Calleja, Jesus M.

AU - Heaton, Laura

AU - Asamoah-Odei, Emil

AU - Poumerol, Gilles

AU - Lazzari, Stefano

AU - Ghys, Peter D.

AU - Schwartländer, Bernhard

AU - Stanecki, Karen A.

PY - 2001/8/17

Y1 - 2001/8/17

N2 - Objective: The objective of this paper was to analyse the quality of HIV/AIDS sentinel surveillance systems in countries and the resulting quality of the data used to make estimates of HIV/AIDS prevalence and mortality. Methods: Available data on sero-surveillance of HIV/AIDS in countries were compiled in the process of making the end of 1999 estimates of HIV/AIDS. These data came primarily from the HIV/AIDS Surveillance Database developed by the United States Census Bureau, from a database maintained by the European Centre for the Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS and all country reports on sentinel surveillance that had been provided to World Health Organization or UNAIDS. Procedures were developed to score quality of surveillance systems based on four dimensions of quality: timeliness and frequency; appropriateness of groups; consistency of sites over time; and coverage provided by the system. In total, the surveillance systems from 167 countries were analysed. Results: Forty-seven of the 167 countries whose surveillance systems were rated were judged to have fully implemented sentinel surveillance systems; 51 were judged to have systems that had some or most aspects of a good HIV surveillance system in place and 69 were rated as having poorly functioning or non-existent surveillance systems. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that the quality of HIV surveillance varies considerably. The majority of countries most affected by HIV/AIDS have systems that are providing sufficient sero-prevalence data for tracking the epidemic and making reasonable estimates of HIV prevalence. However, many countries have poor systems and strengthening these is an urgent priority.

AB - Objective: The objective of this paper was to analyse the quality of HIV/AIDS sentinel surveillance systems in countries and the resulting quality of the data used to make estimates of HIV/AIDS prevalence and mortality. Methods: Available data on sero-surveillance of HIV/AIDS in countries were compiled in the process of making the end of 1999 estimates of HIV/AIDS. These data came primarily from the HIV/AIDS Surveillance Database developed by the United States Census Bureau, from a database maintained by the European Centre for the Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS and all country reports on sentinel surveillance that had been provided to World Health Organization or UNAIDS. Procedures were developed to score quality of surveillance systems based on four dimensions of quality: timeliness and frequency; appropriateness of groups; consistency of sites over time; and coverage provided by the system. In total, the surveillance systems from 167 countries were analysed. Results: Forty-seven of the 167 countries whose surveillance systems were rated were judged to have fully implemented sentinel surveillance systems; 51 were judged to have systems that had some or most aspects of a good HIV surveillance system in place and 69 were rated as having poorly functioning or non-existent surveillance systems. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that the quality of HIV surveillance varies considerably. The majority of countries most affected by HIV/AIDS have systems that are providing sufficient sero-prevalence data for tracking the epidemic and making reasonable estimates of HIV prevalence. However, many countries have poor systems and strengthening these is an urgent priority.

KW - AIDS

KW - Data quality

KW - Estimates of HIV/AIDS

KW - HIV

KW - Surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035902941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035902941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00002030-200108170-00012

DO - 10.1097/00002030-200108170-00012

M3 - Article

C2 - 11504987

AN - SCOPUS:0035902941

VL - 15

SP - 1545

EP - 1554

JO - AIDS

JF - AIDS

SN - 0269-9370

IS - 12

ER -