Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot test for diagnosis of human hydatid disease

M. Verastegui, P. Moro, A. Guevara, T. Rodriguez, E. Miranda, Robert H Gilman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Sera from 71 patients with surgically confirmed hydatid disease (which is caused by Echinococcus granulosus) were studied by an enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot (EITB) assay. Sera from patients either with other cestode infections or with another illness were used as controls. Results of the EITB test for hydatidosis were compared with those of the double- diffusion (DD5) test and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In the EITB assay with bovine lyophilized hydatid fluid, three antigen bands of 8, 16, and 21 kDa were diagnostically important. The sensitivity of the assay by using these antigen bands was 80% for hepatic cysts, 56% for pulmonary cysts, and 56% for cysts located in multiple organs. In sera from controls, the specificity of the EITB assay was 100%. Cross-reactions to the 8-, 16-, and 21-kDa bands occurred, respectively, in 12, 4, and 4% of sera from patients with cysticercosis. No cross-reactions were noted in patients infected with Hymenolepis nana. The ELISA in which swine hydatid fluid was used as the antigen was as sensitive as the EITB test but was less specific (80%) and frequently cross-reacted with sera from patients with other cestode infections. The sensitivity of the DD5 test, which uses sheep hydatid fluid, was low (47%), but its specificity was as high as that of the EITB assay. However, in patients with cysticercosis, cross-reactions were observed in 23% of sera tested. Despite the higher sensitivity found with the EITB assay, 23% (n = 5) of the serum samples that were positive by the DD5 test were not detected by the EITB assay. The EITB assay offers greater sensitivity and specificity than do the ELISA and the DD5 test. The highest proportion of hydatid cases is detected when the EITB and DD5 tests are run simultaneously.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1557-1561
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Microbiology
Volume30
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Enzymes
Serum
Cross Reactions
Cestode Infections
Cysts
Cysticercosis
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Antigens
Hymenolepis nana
Echinococcus granulosus
Echinococcosis
Sheep
Swine
Sensitivity and Specificity
Lung
Liver

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

Verastegui, M., Moro, P., Guevara, A., Rodriguez, T., Miranda, E., & Gilman, R. H. (1992). Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot test for diagnosis of human hydatid disease. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 30(6), 1557-1561.

Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot test for diagnosis of human hydatid disease. / Verastegui, M.; Moro, P.; Guevara, A.; Rodriguez, T.; Miranda, E.; Gilman, Robert H.

In: Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1992, p. 1557-1561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Verastegui, M, Moro, P, Guevara, A, Rodriguez, T, Miranda, E & Gilman, RH 1992, 'Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot test for diagnosis of human hydatid disease', Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1557-1561.
Verastegui, M. ; Moro, P. ; Guevara, A. ; Rodriguez, T. ; Miranda, E. ; Gilman, Robert H. / Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot test for diagnosis of human hydatid disease. In: Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1992 ; Vol. 30, No. 6. pp. 1557-1561.
@article{da486243a87946279c864cbb4ecd8152,
title = "Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot test for diagnosis of human hydatid disease",
abstract = "Sera from 71 patients with surgically confirmed hydatid disease (which is caused by Echinococcus granulosus) were studied by an enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot (EITB) assay. Sera from patients either with other cestode infections or with another illness were used as controls. Results of the EITB test for hydatidosis were compared with those of the double- diffusion (DD5) test and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In the EITB assay with bovine lyophilized hydatid fluid, three antigen bands of 8, 16, and 21 kDa were diagnostically important. The sensitivity of the assay by using these antigen bands was 80{\%} for hepatic cysts, 56{\%} for pulmonary cysts, and 56{\%} for cysts located in multiple organs. In sera from controls, the specificity of the EITB assay was 100{\%}. Cross-reactions to the 8-, 16-, and 21-kDa bands occurred, respectively, in 12, 4, and 4{\%} of sera from patients with cysticercosis. No cross-reactions were noted in patients infected with Hymenolepis nana. The ELISA in which swine hydatid fluid was used as the antigen was as sensitive as the EITB test but was less specific (80{\%}) and frequently cross-reacted with sera from patients with other cestode infections. The sensitivity of the DD5 test, which uses sheep hydatid fluid, was low (47{\%}), but its specificity was as high as that of the EITB assay. However, in patients with cysticercosis, cross-reactions were observed in 23{\%} of sera tested. Despite the higher sensitivity found with the EITB assay, 23{\%} (n = 5) of the serum samples that were positive by the DD5 test were not detected by the EITB assay. The EITB assay offers greater sensitivity and specificity than do the ELISA and the DD5 test. The highest proportion of hydatid cases is detected when the EITB and DD5 tests are run simultaneously.",
author = "M. Verastegui and P. Moro and A. Guevara and T. Rodriguez and E. Miranda and Gilman, {Robert H}",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "1557--1561",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Microbiology",
issn = "0095-1137",
publisher = "American Society for Microbiology",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot test for diagnosis of human hydatid disease

AU - Verastegui, M.

AU - Moro, P.

AU - Guevara, A.

AU - Rodriguez, T.

AU - Miranda, E.

AU - Gilman, Robert H

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Sera from 71 patients with surgically confirmed hydatid disease (which is caused by Echinococcus granulosus) were studied by an enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot (EITB) assay. Sera from patients either with other cestode infections or with another illness were used as controls. Results of the EITB test for hydatidosis were compared with those of the double- diffusion (DD5) test and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In the EITB assay with bovine lyophilized hydatid fluid, three antigen bands of 8, 16, and 21 kDa were diagnostically important. The sensitivity of the assay by using these antigen bands was 80% for hepatic cysts, 56% for pulmonary cysts, and 56% for cysts located in multiple organs. In sera from controls, the specificity of the EITB assay was 100%. Cross-reactions to the 8-, 16-, and 21-kDa bands occurred, respectively, in 12, 4, and 4% of sera from patients with cysticercosis. No cross-reactions were noted in patients infected with Hymenolepis nana. The ELISA in which swine hydatid fluid was used as the antigen was as sensitive as the EITB test but was less specific (80%) and frequently cross-reacted with sera from patients with other cestode infections. The sensitivity of the DD5 test, which uses sheep hydatid fluid, was low (47%), but its specificity was as high as that of the EITB assay. However, in patients with cysticercosis, cross-reactions were observed in 23% of sera tested. Despite the higher sensitivity found with the EITB assay, 23% (n = 5) of the serum samples that were positive by the DD5 test were not detected by the EITB assay. The EITB assay offers greater sensitivity and specificity than do the ELISA and the DD5 test. The highest proportion of hydatid cases is detected when the EITB and DD5 tests are run simultaneously.

AB - Sera from 71 patients with surgically confirmed hydatid disease (which is caused by Echinococcus granulosus) were studied by an enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot (EITB) assay. Sera from patients either with other cestode infections or with another illness were used as controls. Results of the EITB test for hydatidosis were compared with those of the double- diffusion (DD5) test and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In the EITB assay with bovine lyophilized hydatid fluid, three antigen bands of 8, 16, and 21 kDa were diagnostically important. The sensitivity of the assay by using these antigen bands was 80% for hepatic cysts, 56% for pulmonary cysts, and 56% for cysts located in multiple organs. In sera from controls, the specificity of the EITB assay was 100%. Cross-reactions to the 8-, 16-, and 21-kDa bands occurred, respectively, in 12, 4, and 4% of sera from patients with cysticercosis. No cross-reactions were noted in patients infected with Hymenolepis nana. The ELISA in which swine hydatid fluid was used as the antigen was as sensitive as the EITB test but was less specific (80%) and frequently cross-reacted with sera from patients with other cestode infections. The sensitivity of the DD5 test, which uses sheep hydatid fluid, was low (47%), but its specificity was as high as that of the EITB assay. However, in patients with cysticercosis, cross-reactions were observed in 23% of sera tested. Despite the higher sensitivity found with the EITB assay, 23% (n = 5) of the serum samples that were positive by the DD5 test were not detected by the EITB assay. The EITB assay offers greater sensitivity and specificity than do the ELISA and the DD5 test. The highest proportion of hydatid cases is detected when the EITB and DD5 tests are run simultaneously.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026719363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026719363&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1624574

AN - SCOPUS:0026719363

VL - 30

SP - 1557

EP - 1561

JO - Journal of Clinical Microbiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Microbiology

SN - 0095-1137

IS - 6

ER -