Environmental health impacts of feeding crops to farmed fish

Jillian Fry, David C Love, Graham K. MacDonald, Paul C. West, Peder M. Engstrom, Keeve Nachman, Robert S Lawrence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Half of the seafood consumed globally now comes from aquaculture, or farmed seafood. Aquaculture therefore plays an increasingly important role in the global food system, the environment, and human health. Traditionally, aquaculture feed has contained high levels of wild fish, which is unsustainable for ocean ecosystems as demand grows. The aquaculture industry is shifting to crop-based feed ingredients, such as soy, to replace wild fish as a feed source and allow for continued industry growth. This shift fundamentally links seafood production to terrestrial agriculture, and multidisciplinary research is needed to understand the ecological and environmental health implications. We provide basic estimates of the agricultural resource use associated with producing the top five crops used in commercial aquaculture feed. Aquaculture's environmental footprint may now include nutrient and pesticide runoff from industrial crop production, and depending on where and how feed crops are produced, could be indirectly linked to associated negative health outcomes. We summarize key environmental health research on health effects associated with exposure to air, water, and soil contaminated by industrial crop production. Our review also finds that changes in the nutritional content of farmed seafood products due to altered feed composition could impact human nutrition. Based on our literature reviews and estimates of resource use, we present a conceptual framework describing the potential links between increasing use of crop-based ingredients in aquaculture and human health. Additional data and geographic sourcing information for crop-based ingredients are needed to fully assess the environmental health implications of this trend. This is especially critical in the context of a food system that is using both aquatic and terrestrial resources at unsustainable rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)201-214
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironment International
Volume91
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

health impact
aquaculture
seafood
crop
fish
resource use
crop production
aquaculture industry
food
conceptual framework
literature review
anthropogenic effect
footprint
environmental health
nutrition
pesticide
runoff
agriculture
nutrient
ecosystem

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Aquaculture
  • Environmental health
  • Nutrition
  • Seafood
  • Sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Environmental health impacts of feeding crops to farmed fish. / Fry, Jillian; Love, David C; MacDonald, Graham K.; West, Paul C.; Engstrom, Peder M.; Nachman, Keeve; Lawrence, Robert S.

In: Environment International, Vol. 91, 01.05.2016, p. 201-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fry, Jillian ; Love, David C ; MacDonald, Graham K. ; West, Paul C. ; Engstrom, Peder M. ; Nachman, Keeve ; Lawrence, Robert S. / Environmental health impacts of feeding crops to farmed fish. In: Environment International. 2016 ; Vol. 91. pp. 201-214.
@article{26efb43e06c74dfdb34481e385ad2fbd,
title = "Environmental health impacts of feeding crops to farmed fish",
abstract = "Half of the seafood consumed globally now comes from aquaculture, or farmed seafood. Aquaculture therefore plays an increasingly important role in the global food system, the environment, and human health. Traditionally, aquaculture feed has contained high levels of wild fish, which is unsustainable for ocean ecosystems as demand grows. The aquaculture industry is shifting to crop-based feed ingredients, such as soy, to replace wild fish as a feed source and allow for continued industry growth. This shift fundamentally links seafood production to terrestrial agriculture, and multidisciplinary research is needed to understand the ecological and environmental health implications. We provide basic estimates of the agricultural resource use associated with producing the top five crops used in commercial aquaculture feed. Aquaculture's environmental footprint may now include nutrient and pesticide runoff from industrial crop production, and depending on where and how feed crops are produced, could be indirectly linked to associated negative health outcomes. We summarize key environmental health research on health effects associated with exposure to air, water, and soil contaminated by industrial crop production. Our review also finds that changes in the nutritional content of farmed seafood products due to altered feed composition could impact human nutrition. Based on our literature reviews and estimates of resource use, we present a conceptual framework describing the potential links between increasing use of crop-based ingredients in aquaculture and human health. Additional data and geographic sourcing information for crop-based ingredients are needed to fully assess the environmental health implications of this trend. This is especially critical in the context of a food system that is using both aquatic and terrestrial resources at unsustainable rates.",
keywords = "Agriculture, Aquaculture, Environmental health, Nutrition, Seafood, Sustainability",
author = "Jillian Fry and Love, {David C} and MacDonald, {Graham K.} and West, {Paul C.} and Engstrom, {Peder M.} and Keeve Nachman and Lawrence, {Robert S}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "201--214",
journal = "Environmental International",
issn = "0160-4120",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental health impacts of feeding crops to farmed fish

AU - Fry, Jillian

AU - Love, David C

AU - MacDonald, Graham K.

AU - West, Paul C.

AU - Engstrom, Peder M.

AU - Nachman, Keeve

AU - Lawrence, Robert S

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Half of the seafood consumed globally now comes from aquaculture, or farmed seafood. Aquaculture therefore plays an increasingly important role in the global food system, the environment, and human health. Traditionally, aquaculture feed has contained high levels of wild fish, which is unsustainable for ocean ecosystems as demand grows. The aquaculture industry is shifting to crop-based feed ingredients, such as soy, to replace wild fish as a feed source and allow for continued industry growth. This shift fundamentally links seafood production to terrestrial agriculture, and multidisciplinary research is needed to understand the ecological and environmental health implications. We provide basic estimates of the agricultural resource use associated with producing the top five crops used in commercial aquaculture feed. Aquaculture's environmental footprint may now include nutrient and pesticide runoff from industrial crop production, and depending on where and how feed crops are produced, could be indirectly linked to associated negative health outcomes. We summarize key environmental health research on health effects associated with exposure to air, water, and soil contaminated by industrial crop production. Our review also finds that changes in the nutritional content of farmed seafood products due to altered feed composition could impact human nutrition. Based on our literature reviews and estimates of resource use, we present a conceptual framework describing the potential links between increasing use of crop-based ingredients in aquaculture and human health. Additional data and geographic sourcing information for crop-based ingredients are needed to fully assess the environmental health implications of this trend. This is especially critical in the context of a food system that is using both aquatic and terrestrial resources at unsustainable rates.

AB - Half of the seafood consumed globally now comes from aquaculture, or farmed seafood. Aquaculture therefore plays an increasingly important role in the global food system, the environment, and human health. Traditionally, aquaculture feed has contained high levels of wild fish, which is unsustainable for ocean ecosystems as demand grows. The aquaculture industry is shifting to crop-based feed ingredients, such as soy, to replace wild fish as a feed source and allow for continued industry growth. This shift fundamentally links seafood production to terrestrial agriculture, and multidisciplinary research is needed to understand the ecological and environmental health implications. We provide basic estimates of the agricultural resource use associated with producing the top five crops used in commercial aquaculture feed. Aquaculture's environmental footprint may now include nutrient and pesticide runoff from industrial crop production, and depending on where and how feed crops are produced, could be indirectly linked to associated negative health outcomes. We summarize key environmental health research on health effects associated with exposure to air, water, and soil contaminated by industrial crop production. Our review also finds that changes in the nutritional content of farmed seafood products due to altered feed composition could impact human nutrition. Based on our literature reviews and estimates of resource use, we present a conceptual framework describing the potential links between increasing use of crop-based ingredients in aquaculture and human health. Additional data and geographic sourcing information for crop-based ingredients are needed to fully assess the environmental health implications of this trend. This is especially critical in the context of a food system that is using both aquatic and terrestrial resources at unsustainable rates.

KW - Agriculture

KW - Aquaculture

KW - Environmental health

KW - Nutrition

KW - Seafood

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961783948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961783948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.022

DO - 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.022

M3 - Article

C2 - 26970884

AN - SCOPUS:84961783948

VL - 91

SP - 201

EP - 214

JO - Environmental International

JF - Environmental International

SN - 0160-4120

ER -