Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results

Courtney Berrios, Cynthia Anne James, Karen Raraigh, Juli Bollinger, Brittney Murray, Crystal Tichnell, Carolyn D. Applegate, Amanda L. Bergner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Genetic counselors working in a clinical setting may find themselves recruiting, enrolling, and returning results for genomic research, and existing clinical relationships with study participants may impact these research interactions. We present a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of participants enrolled in a genome sequencing/exome sequencing (GS/ES) study at the same institution where they receive clinical care. Interviews were coded for motivations to participate and expectations of this research. The interviews revealed common motivations for participation, including altruism and hope for benefit for themselves, family members, and/or others with their condition. Additionally, themes emerged related to unintentional influence based on trust of the clinical provider that recruited them to the study. Participant trust in the enrolling provider at times appeared to extend to the study team to decide which research results to return and to do so in an appropriate format. Participants also based expectations for research results return on previous clinical genetic testing experiences, which may or may not be realistic depending on study design. It is imperative that genetic counselors enrolling patients into research studies be aware of the potential influence of their clinical relationship on potential subjects, be transparent about their role on the study team, and help set expectations about the study process, including results return.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Genetic Counseling
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 20 2017

Fingerprint

Genomics
Informed Consent
Research
Interviews
Motivation
Hope
Exome
Altruism
Genetic Testing
Genome

Keywords

  • Expectations
  • Genetic counseling
  • Genomics research
  • Influence of provider
  • Motivations
  • Return of results

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting : the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results. / Berrios, Courtney; James, Cynthia Anne; Raraigh, Karen; Bollinger, Juli; Murray, Brittney; Tichnell, Crystal; Applegate, Carolyn D.; Bergner, Amanda L.

In: Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20.09.2017, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berrios, Courtney ; James, Cynthia Anne ; Raraigh, Karen ; Bollinger, Juli ; Murray, Brittney ; Tichnell, Crystal ; Applegate, Carolyn D. ; Bergner, Amanda L. / Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting : the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results. In: Journal of Genetic Counseling. 2017 ; pp. 1-11.
@article{eee8acdd0bba4b339d19b605ee259fde,
title = "Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results",
abstract = "Genetic counselors working in a clinical setting may find themselves recruiting, enrolling, and returning results for genomic research, and existing clinical relationships with study participants may impact these research interactions. We present a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of participants enrolled in a genome sequencing/exome sequencing (GS/ES) study at the same institution where they receive clinical care. Interviews were coded for motivations to participate and expectations of this research. The interviews revealed common motivations for participation, including altruism and hope for benefit for themselves, family members, and/or others with their condition. Additionally, themes emerged related to unintentional influence based on trust of the clinical provider that recruited them to the study. Participant trust in the enrolling provider at times appeared to extend to the study team to decide which research results to return and to do so in an appropriate format. Participants also based expectations for research results return on previous clinical genetic testing experiences, which may or may not be realistic depending on study design. It is imperative that genetic counselors enrolling patients into research studies be aware of the potential influence of their clinical relationship on potential subjects, be transparent about their role on the study team, and help set expectations about the study process, including results return.",
keywords = "Expectations, Genetic counseling, Genomics research, Influence of provider, Motivations, Return of results",
author = "Courtney Berrios and James, {Cynthia Anne} and Karen Raraigh and Juli Bollinger and Brittney Murray and Crystal Tichnell and Applegate, {Carolyn D.} and Bergner, {Amanda L.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1007/s10897-017-0143-2",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Journal of Genetic Counseling",
issn = "1059-7700",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic/Human Sciences Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting

T2 - the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results

AU - Berrios, Courtney

AU - James, Cynthia Anne

AU - Raraigh, Karen

AU - Bollinger, Juli

AU - Murray, Brittney

AU - Tichnell, Crystal

AU - Applegate, Carolyn D.

AU - Bergner, Amanda L.

PY - 2017/9/20

Y1 - 2017/9/20

N2 - Genetic counselors working in a clinical setting may find themselves recruiting, enrolling, and returning results for genomic research, and existing clinical relationships with study participants may impact these research interactions. We present a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of participants enrolled in a genome sequencing/exome sequencing (GS/ES) study at the same institution where they receive clinical care. Interviews were coded for motivations to participate and expectations of this research. The interviews revealed common motivations for participation, including altruism and hope for benefit for themselves, family members, and/or others with their condition. Additionally, themes emerged related to unintentional influence based on trust of the clinical provider that recruited them to the study. Participant trust in the enrolling provider at times appeared to extend to the study team to decide which research results to return and to do so in an appropriate format. Participants also based expectations for research results return on previous clinical genetic testing experiences, which may or may not be realistic depending on study design. It is imperative that genetic counselors enrolling patients into research studies be aware of the potential influence of their clinical relationship on potential subjects, be transparent about their role on the study team, and help set expectations about the study process, including results return.

AB - Genetic counselors working in a clinical setting may find themselves recruiting, enrolling, and returning results for genomic research, and existing clinical relationships with study participants may impact these research interactions. We present a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of participants enrolled in a genome sequencing/exome sequencing (GS/ES) study at the same institution where they receive clinical care. Interviews were coded for motivations to participate and expectations of this research. The interviews revealed common motivations for participation, including altruism and hope for benefit for themselves, family members, and/or others with their condition. Additionally, themes emerged related to unintentional influence based on trust of the clinical provider that recruited them to the study. Participant trust in the enrolling provider at times appeared to extend to the study team to decide which research results to return and to do so in an appropriate format. Participants also based expectations for research results return on previous clinical genetic testing experiences, which may or may not be realistic depending on study design. It is imperative that genetic counselors enrolling patients into research studies be aware of the potential influence of their clinical relationship on potential subjects, be transparent about their role on the study team, and help set expectations about the study process, including results return.

KW - Expectations

KW - Genetic counseling

KW - Genomics research

KW - Influence of provider

KW - Motivations

KW - Return of results

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029591484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029591484&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10897-017-0143-2

DO - 10.1007/s10897-017-0143-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 28932961

AN - SCOPUS:85029591484

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Genetic Counseling

JF - Journal of Genetic Counseling

SN - 1059-7700

ER -