End‐to‐end and end‐to‐side microvascular anastomoses: A comparative study

John L. Frodel, Ronald Trachy, Charles W. Cummings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The decision to use an end‐to‐end versus end‐to‐side anastomosis remains a controversial issue in microvascular surgery, although it is generally accepted that certain clinical situations require skills in both techniques (eg, vessel size discrepancy or the need to preserve donor vessel distal flow). Using rats, this investigation presents a unique free flap model comparing not only arterial end‐to‐end and end‐to‐side anastomoses, but venous anastomoses as well. There were 15 animals in each anastomoses group with a greater than 80% flap survival rate in each group. This supports findings of earlier studies that suggested no difference in survival when these two anastomosis types were compared. Equally important was the assessment of dermofluorormetry as an immediate postoperative perfusion monitoring device. In this model, fluorometry was not found to be useful for predicting flap viability in an early period after completion of the anastomoses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-123
Number of pages7
JournalMicrosurgery
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'End‐to‐end and end‐to‐side microvascular anastomoses: A comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this