Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

J. Mark Riddell, James Hamilton Black, David C. Brewster, Peter F. Dunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is not a surprise that overall patient satisfaction is quite high given the rapidity of recovery of EVAR versus conventional repair; however, patients and families can underestimate the importance, and intrusion, of lifelong surveillance after EVAR. Nonetheless, EVAR has been enthusiastically accepted by many patients and physicians alike as a viable alternative to standard open repair of the AAA. EVAR also presents a challenge for the anesthesiologist, because it is often carried out on patients who might be too sick for open repair. The less invasive nature of the procedure seems particularly well-suited and advantageous in patients with AAA who were previously deemed to be too "high risk" on the basis of comorbidity or prior abdominal surgeries. EVAR could also be beneficial in patients with other unusual technical problems such as paraanastomotic pseudoaneurysms, previous aortic procedures, or prior renal transplantations. In time, technologic advances could expand the application of EVAR to include more complex aneurysms that involve aortic branches such as pararenal or thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Also, smaller delivery systems could eventually allow total percutaneous access for implantation and obviate the need for surgical exposure of the femoral vessels. For now, the current results and strategies of EVAR are competitive enough that surgeons have an obligation to at least offer the possibility of endoluminal repair, inform the patient of the advantages and limitations as best we know, and then let the patient determine which road they want to travel. For vascular surgeons and vascular anesthesiologists who care for patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair, as Yogi Berra once said, "The future ain't what it used to be".

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-91
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Anesthesiology Clinics
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Aneurysm
Blood Vessels
Aortic Aneurysm
False Aneurysm
Thigh
Patient Satisfaction
Angioplasty
Kidney Transplantation
Comorbidity
Patient Care
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. / Riddell, J. Mark; Black, James Hamilton; Brewster, David C.; Dunn, Peter F.

In: International Anesthesiology Clinics, Vol. 43, No. 1, 12.2005, p. 79-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Riddell, J. Mark ; Black, James Hamilton ; Brewster, David C. ; Dunn, Peter F. / Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. In: International Anesthesiology Clinics. 2005 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 79-91.
@article{4d6ff49ee91a4a4593e59499309e93ed,
title = "Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair",
abstract = "It is not a surprise that overall patient satisfaction is quite high given the rapidity of recovery of EVAR versus conventional repair; however, patients and families can underestimate the importance, and intrusion, of lifelong surveillance after EVAR. Nonetheless, EVAR has been enthusiastically accepted by many patients and physicians alike as a viable alternative to standard open repair of the AAA. EVAR also presents a challenge for the anesthesiologist, because it is often carried out on patients who might be too sick for open repair. The less invasive nature of the procedure seems particularly well-suited and advantageous in patients with AAA who were previously deemed to be too {"}high risk{"} on the basis of comorbidity or prior abdominal surgeries. EVAR could also be beneficial in patients with other unusual technical problems such as paraanastomotic pseudoaneurysms, previous aortic procedures, or prior renal transplantations. In time, technologic advances could expand the application of EVAR to include more complex aneurysms that involve aortic branches such as pararenal or thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Also, smaller delivery systems could eventually allow total percutaneous access for implantation and obviate the need for surgical exposure of the femoral vessels. For now, the current results and strategies of EVAR are competitive enough that surgeons have an obligation to at least offer the possibility of endoluminal repair, inform the patient of the advantages and limitations as best we know, and then let the patient determine which road they want to travel. For vascular surgeons and vascular anesthesiologists who care for patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair, as Yogi Berra once said, {"}The future ain't what it used to be{"}.",
author = "Riddell, {J. Mark} and Black, {James Hamilton} and Brewster, {David C.} and Dunn, {Peter F.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/01.aia.0000148887.71109.39",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "79--91",
journal = "International Anesthesiology Clinics",
issn = "0020-5907",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

AU - Riddell, J. Mark

AU - Black, James Hamilton

AU - Brewster, David C.

AU - Dunn, Peter F.

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - It is not a surprise that overall patient satisfaction is quite high given the rapidity of recovery of EVAR versus conventional repair; however, patients and families can underestimate the importance, and intrusion, of lifelong surveillance after EVAR. Nonetheless, EVAR has been enthusiastically accepted by many patients and physicians alike as a viable alternative to standard open repair of the AAA. EVAR also presents a challenge for the anesthesiologist, because it is often carried out on patients who might be too sick for open repair. The less invasive nature of the procedure seems particularly well-suited and advantageous in patients with AAA who were previously deemed to be too "high risk" on the basis of comorbidity or prior abdominal surgeries. EVAR could also be beneficial in patients with other unusual technical problems such as paraanastomotic pseudoaneurysms, previous aortic procedures, or prior renal transplantations. In time, technologic advances could expand the application of EVAR to include more complex aneurysms that involve aortic branches such as pararenal or thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Also, smaller delivery systems could eventually allow total percutaneous access for implantation and obviate the need for surgical exposure of the femoral vessels. For now, the current results and strategies of EVAR are competitive enough that surgeons have an obligation to at least offer the possibility of endoluminal repair, inform the patient of the advantages and limitations as best we know, and then let the patient determine which road they want to travel. For vascular surgeons and vascular anesthesiologists who care for patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair, as Yogi Berra once said, "The future ain't what it used to be".

AB - It is not a surprise that overall patient satisfaction is quite high given the rapidity of recovery of EVAR versus conventional repair; however, patients and families can underestimate the importance, and intrusion, of lifelong surveillance after EVAR. Nonetheless, EVAR has been enthusiastically accepted by many patients and physicians alike as a viable alternative to standard open repair of the AAA. EVAR also presents a challenge for the anesthesiologist, because it is often carried out on patients who might be too sick for open repair. The less invasive nature of the procedure seems particularly well-suited and advantageous in patients with AAA who were previously deemed to be too "high risk" on the basis of comorbidity or prior abdominal surgeries. EVAR could also be beneficial in patients with other unusual technical problems such as paraanastomotic pseudoaneurysms, previous aortic procedures, or prior renal transplantations. In time, technologic advances could expand the application of EVAR to include more complex aneurysms that involve aortic branches such as pararenal or thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Also, smaller delivery systems could eventually allow total percutaneous access for implantation and obviate the need for surgical exposure of the femoral vessels. For now, the current results and strategies of EVAR are competitive enough that surgeons have an obligation to at least offer the possibility of endoluminal repair, inform the patient of the advantages and limitations as best we know, and then let the patient determine which road they want to travel. For vascular surgeons and vascular anesthesiologists who care for patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair, as Yogi Berra once said, "The future ain't what it used to be".

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13444250973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13444250973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.aia.0000148887.71109.39

DO - 10.1097/01.aia.0000148887.71109.39

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 79

EP - 91

JO - International Anesthesiology Clinics

JF - International Anesthesiology Clinics

SN - 0020-5907

IS - 1

ER -