Endoscopic management and outcomes of pregnant women hospitalized for nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: A nationwide analysis

Geoffrey C. Nguyen, Amreen M. Dinani, Kevin Pivovarov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background Upper GI endoscopy has an important diagnostic and therapeutic role in the management of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding (NVUGB). Objective To characterize nationwide patterns of utilization of upper GI endoscopy in pregnant women with NVUGB and to assess health outcomes. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Participating hospitals from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1998-2007. Patients Pregnant and age-matched nonpregnant women admitted for NVUGB. Intervention The study population was classified as pregnant women with NVUGB (n = 1210) and nonpregnant women with NVUGB (n = 6050). Main Outcome Measurements Rate of upper GI endoscopy, maternal mortality, fetal death/complications, and premature delivery. Results Pregnant women were less likely than nonpregnant women to undergo upper GI endoscopy (26% vs 69%; P <.0001) even after adjustment for comorbidities, transfusion requirement, and the presence of hypovolemic shock (adjusted odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.22). Among those who underwent endoscopy, pregnant women were less likely to undergo the procedure within 24 hours of admission (50% vs 57%; P = .02). Mortality was lower among pregnant women compared with nonpregnant women (0% vs 0.6%; P = .006). In comparing outcomes between those who did and did not undergo endoscopy, there was no difference in fetal loss (0.2% vs 0.6%), fetal distress/complications (2.7% vs 2.6%), or premature delivery (7.3% vs 6.4%). Limitations The study was based on administrative data. Conclusion A conservative nonendoscopic approach is common in the management of pregnant women with NVUGB and is not associated with worse maternal or fetal outcomes. Upper GI endoscopy is, however, safe when judiciously implemented in the actively bleeding patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)954-959
Number of pages6
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume72
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Endoscopy
Pregnant Women
Hemorrhage
Fetal Distress
Fetal Death
Maternal Mortality
Comorbidity
Inpatients
Shock
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Odds Ratio
Mothers
Confidence Intervals
Mortality
Health
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Endoscopic management and outcomes of pregnant women hospitalized for nonvariceal upper GI bleeding : A nationwide analysis. / Nguyen, Geoffrey C.; Dinani, Amreen M.; Pivovarov, Kevin.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 72, No. 5, 11.2010, p. 954-959.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nguyen, Geoffrey C. ; Dinani, Amreen M. ; Pivovarov, Kevin. / Endoscopic management and outcomes of pregnant women hospitalized for nonvariceal upper GI bleeding : A nationwide analysis. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2010 ; Vol. 72, No. 5. pp. 954-959.
@article{60b21beee83141268bd792c873451fe0,
title = "Endoscopic management and outcomes of pregnant women hospitalized for nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: A nationwide analysis",
abstract = "Background Upper GI endoscopy has an important diagnostic and therapeutic role in the management of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding (NVUGB). Objective To characterize nationwide patterns of utilization of upper GI endoscopy in pregnant women with NVUGB and to assess health outcomes. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Participating hospitals from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1998-2007. Patients Pregnant and age-matched nonpregnant women admitted for NVUGB. Intervention The study population was classified as pregnant women with NVUGB (n = 1210) and nonpregnant women with NVUGB (n = 6050). Main Outcome Measurements Rate of upper GI endoscopy, maternal mortality, fetal death/complications, and premature delivery. Results Pregnant women were less likely than nonpregnant women to undergo upper GI endoscopy (26{\%} vs 69{\%}; P <.0001) even after adjustment for comorbidities, transfusion requirement, and the presence of hypovolemic shock (adjusted odds ratio, 0.19; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.16-0.22). Among those who underwent endoscopy, pregnant women were less likely to undergo the procedure within 24 hours of admission (50{\%} vs 57{\%}; P = .02). Mortality was lower among pregnant women compared with nonpregnant women (0{\%} vs 0.6{\%}; P = .006). In comparing outcomes between those who did and did not undergo endoscopy, there was no difference in fetal loss (0.2{\%} vs 0.6{\%}), fetal distress/complications (2.7{\%} vs 2.6{\%}), or premature delivery (7.3{\%} vs 6.4{\%}). Limitations The study was based on administrative data. Conclusion A conservative nonendoscopic approach is common in the management of pregnant women with NVUGB and is not associated with worse maternal or fetal outcomes. Upper GI endoscopy is, however, safe when judiciously implemented in the actively bleeding patient.",
author = "Nguyen, {Geoffrey C.} and Dinani, {Amreen M.} and Kevin Pivovarov",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "954--959",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopic management and outcomes of pregnant women hospitalized for nonvariceal upper GI bleeding

T2 - A nationwide analysis

AU - Nguyen, Geoffrey C.

AU - Dinani, Amreen M.

AU - Pivovarov, Kevin

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - Background Upper GI endoscopy has an important diagnostic and therapeutic role in the management of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding (NVUGB). Objective To characterize nationwide patterns of utilization of upper GI endoscopy in pregnant women with NVUGB and to assess health outcomes. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Participating hospitals from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1998-2007. Patients Pregnant and age-matched nonpregnant women admitted for NVUGB. Intervention The study population was classified as pregnant women with NVUGB (n = 1210) and nonpregnant women with NVUGB (n = 6050). Main Outcome Measurements Rate of upper GI endoscopy, maternal mortality, fetal death/complications, and premature delivery. Results Pregnant women were less likely than nonpregnant women to undergo upper GI endoscopy (26% vs 69%; P <.0001) even after adjustment for comorbidities, transfusion requirement, and the presence of hypovolemic shock (adjusted odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.22). Among those who underwent endoscopy, pregnant women were less likely to undergo the procedure within 24 hours of admission (50% vs 57%; P = .02). Mortality was lower among pregnant women compared with nonpregnant women (0% vs 0.6%; P = .006). In comparing outcomes between those who did and did not undergo endoscopy, there was no difference in fetal loss (0.2% vs 0.6%), fetal distress/complications (2.7% vs 2.6%), or premature delivery (7.3% vs 6.4%). Limitations The study was based on administrative data. Conclusion A conservative nonendoscopic approach is common in the management of pregnant women with NVUGB and is not associated with worse maternal or fetal outcomes. Upper GI endoscopy is, however, safe when judiciously implemented in the actively bleeding patient.

AB - Background Upper GI endoscopy has an important diagnostic and therapeutic role in the management of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding (NVUGB). Objective To characterize nationwide patterns of utilization of upper GI endoscopy in pregnant women with NVUGB and to assess health outcomes. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Participating hospitals from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1998-2007. Patients Pregnant and age-matched nonpregnant women admitted for NVUGB. Intervention The study population was classified as pregnant women with NVUGB (n = 1210) and nonpregnant women with NVUGB (n = 6050). Main Outcome Measurements Rate of upper GI endoscopy, maternal mortality, fetal death/complications, and premature delivery. Results Pregnant women were less likely than nonpregnant women to undergo upper GI endoscopy (26% vs 69%; P <.0001) even after adjustment for comorbidities, transfusion requirement, and the presence of hypovolemic shock (adjusted odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.22). Among those who underwent endoscopy, pregnant women were less likely to undergo the procedure within 24 hours of admission (50% vs 57%; P = .02). Mortality was lower among pregnant women compared with nonpregnant women (0% vs 0.6%; P = .006). In comparing outcomes between those who did and did not undergo endoscopy, there was no difference in fetal loss (0.2% vs 0.6%), fetal distress/complications (2.7% vs 2.6%), or premature delivery (7.3% vs 6.4%). Limitations The study was based on administrative data. Conclusion A conservative nonendoscopic approach is common in the management of pregnant women with NVUGB and is not associated with worse maternal or fetal outcomes. Upper GI endoscopy is, however, safe when judiciously implemented in the actively bleeding patient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049335249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049335249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.018

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 20875639

AN - SCOPUS:78049335249

VL - 72

SP - 954

EP - 959

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 5

ER -