Endocardial and epicardial steroid lead pacing in the neonatal and paediatric age group

F. Udink ten Cate, J. Breur, N. Boramanand, Jane Crosson, A. Friedman, Joel Brenner, E. Meijboom, N. Sreeram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: To compare the performance of steroid eluting epicardial and endocardial leads in infants and children requiring permanent pacing. Methods: Evaluation of pacing and sensing characteristics, impedances, and longevity of 159 steroid eluting leads implanted in 95 children. Group A consisted of 24 children weighing less than 15 kg with 15 endocardial leads (five atrial, 10 ventricular) and 19 epicardial leads (five atrial, 14 ventricular). Group B consisted of 71 children weighing more than 15 kg with 106 endocardial leads (56 atrial, 58 ventricular) and 19 epicardial leads (nine atrial, 10 ventricular). Results: Group A: Stimulation thresholds were lower for ventricular endocardial leads at implant (mean (SD) 0.84 (0.54) v 1.59 (0.64) V, p <0.014) and at two year follow up (ventricular 0.64 (0.24) v 1.65 (0.69) V, p <0.003). Impedance and sensing thresholds did not differ significantly at implant and follow up. Group B: Stimulation thresholds were lower for ventricular endocardial leads at implant (0.72 (0.48) v 1.48 (0.58) V, p <0.001) and at follow up (0.88 (0.46) v 1.55 (0.96) V, p <0.009). Impedance did not differ. Sensing thresholds were also better for ventricular endocardial leads at follow up (9.1 (5.2) v 14.2 (6.4) mV, p <0.02). Complications requiring intervention occurred in both groups (n = 7 for endocardial v n = 18 for epicardial leads). Conclusions: Endocardial and epicardial steroid eluting leads have comparable performance in the paediatric population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)392-396
Number of pages5
JournalHeart
Volume88
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 2002

Fingerprint

Age Groups
Electric Impedance
Steroids
Pediatrics
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Udink ten Cate, F., Breur, J., Boramanand, N., Crosson, J., Friedman, A., Brenner, J., ... Sreeram, N. (2002). Endocardial and epicardial steroid lead pacing in the neonatal and paediatric age group. Heart, 88(4), 392-396.

Endocardial and epicardial steroid lead pacing in the neonatal and paediatric age group. / Udink ten Cate, F.; Breur, J.; Boramanand, N.; Crosson, Jane; Friedman, A.; Brenner, Joel; Meijboom, E.; Sreeram, N.

In: Heart, Vol. 88, No. 4, 10.2002, p. 392-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Udink ten Cate, F, Breur, J, Boramanand, N, Crosson, J, Friedman, A, Brenner, J, Meijboom, E & Sreeram, N 2002, 'Endocardial and epicardial steroid lead pacing in the neonatal and paediatric age group', Heart, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 392-396.
Udink ten Cate F, Breur J, Boramanand N, Crosson J, Friedman A, Brenner J et al. Endocardial and epicardial steroid lead pacing in the neonatal and paediatric age group. Heart. 2002 Oct;88(4):392-396.
Udink ten Cate, F. ; Breur, J. ; Boramanand, N. ; Crosson, Jane ; Friedman, A. ; Brenner, Joel ; Meijboom, E. ; Sreeram, N. / Endocardial and epicardial steroid lead pacing in the neonatal and paediatric age group. In: Heart. 2002 ; Vol. 88, No. 4. pp. 392-396.
@article{a7571c1ca9e94470910a8805c4b611a5,
title = "Endocardial and epicardial steroid lead pacing in the neonatal and paediatric age group",
abstract = "Aim: To compare the performance of steroid eluting epicardial and endocardial leads in infants and children requiring permanent pacing. Methods: Evaluation of pacing and sensing characteristics, impedances, and longevity of 159 steroid eluting leads implanted in 95 children. Group A consisted of 24 children weighing less than 15 kg with 15 endocardial leads (five atrial, 10 ventricular) and 19 epicardial leads (five atrial, 14 ventricular). Group B consisted of 71 children weighing more than 15 kg with 106 endocardial leads (56 atrial, 58 ventricular) and 19 epicardial leads (nine atrial, 10 ventricular). Results: Group A: Stimulation thresholds were lower for ventricular endocardial leads at implant (mean (SD) 0.84 (0.54) v 1.59 (0.64) V, p <0.014) and at two year follow up (ventricular 0.64 (0.24) v 1.65 (0.69) V, p <0.003). Impedance and sensing thresholds did not differ significantly at implant and follow up. Group B: Stimulation thresholds were lower for ventricular endocardial leads at implant (0.72 (0.48) v 1.48 (0.58) V, p <0.001) and at follow up (0.88 (0.46) v 1.55 (0.96) V, p <0.009). Impedance did not differ. Sensing thresholds were also better for ventricular endocardial leads at follow up (9.1 (5.2) v 14.2 (6.4) mV, p <0.02). Complications requiring intervention occurred in both groups (n = 7 for endocardial v n = 18 for epicardial leads). Conclusions: Endocardial and epicardial steroid eluting leads have comparable performance in the paediatric population.",
author = "{Udink ten Cate}, F. and J. Breur and N. Boramanand and Jane Crosson and A. Friedman and Joel Brenner and E. Meijboom and N. Sreeram",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "392--396",
journal = "Heart",
issn = "1355-6037",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endocardial and epicardial steroid lead pacing in the neonatal and paediatric age group

AU - Udink ten Cate, F.

AU - Breur, J.

AU - Boramanand, N.

AU - Crosson, Jane

AU - Friedman, A.

AU - Brenner, Joel

AU - Meijboom, E.

AU - Sreeram, N.

PY - 2002/10

Y1 - 2002/10

N2 - Aim: To compare the performance of steroid eluting epicardial and endocardial leads in infants and children requiring permanent pacing. Methods: Evaluation of pacing and sensing characteristics, impedances, and longevity of 159 steroid eluting leads implanted in 95 children. Group A consisted of 24 children weighing less than 15 kg with 15 endocardial leads (five atrial, 10 ventricular) and 19 epicardial leads (five atrial, 14 ventricular). Group B consisted of 71 children weighing more than 15 kg with 106 endocardial leads (56 atrial, 58 ventricular) and 19 epicardial leads (nine atrial, 10 ventricular). Results: Group A: Stimulation thresholds were lower for ventricular endocardial leads at implant (mean (SD) 0.84 (0.54) v 1.59 (0.64) V, p <0.014) and at two year follow up (ventricular 0.64 (0.24) v 1.65 (0.69) V, p <0.003). Impedance and sensing thresholds did not differ significantly at implant and follow up. Group B: Stimulation thresholds were lower for ventricular endocardial leads at implant (0.72 (0.48) v 1.48 (0.58) V, p <0.001) and at follow up (0.88 (0.46) v 1.55 (0.96) V, p <0.009). Impedance did not differ. Sensing thresholds were also better for ventricular endocardial leads at follow up (9.1 (5.2) v 14.2 (6.4) mV, p <0.02). Complications requiring intervention occurred in both groups (n = 7 for endocardial v n = 18 for epicardial leads). Conclusions: Endocardial and epicardial steroid eluting leads have comparable performance in the paediatric population.

AB - Aim: To compare the performance of steroid eluting epicardial and endocardial leads in infants and children requiring permanent pacing. Methods: Evaluation of pacing and sensing characteristics, impedances, and longevity of 159 steroid eluting leads implanted in 95 children. Group A consisted of 24 children weighing less than 15 kg with 15 endocardial leads (five atrial, 10 ventricular) and 19 epicardial leads (five atrial, 14 ventricular). Group B consisted of 71 children weighing more than 15 kg with 106 endocardial leads (56 atrial, 58 ventricular) and 19 epicardial leads (nine atrial, 10 ventricular). Results: Group A: Stimulation thresholds were lower for ventricular endocardial leads at implant (mean (SD) 0.84 (0.54) v 1.59 (0.64) V, p <0.014) and at two year follow up (ventricular 0.64 (0.24) v 1.65 (0.69) V, p <0.003). Impedance and sensing thresholds did not differ significantly at implant and follow up. Group B: Stimulation thresholds were lower for ventricular endocardial leads at implant (0.72 (0.48) v 1.48 (0.58) V, p <0.001) and at follow up (0.88 (0.46) v 1.55 (0.96) V, p <0.009). Impedance did not differ. Sensing thresholds were also better for ventricular endocardial leads at follow up (9.1 (5.2) v 14.2 (6.4) mV, p <0.02). Complications requiring intervention occurred in both groups (n = 7 for endocardial v n = 18 for epicardial leads). Conclusions: Endocardial and epicardial steroid eluting leads have comparable performance in the paediatric population.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036786072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036786072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12231599

AN - SCOPUS:0036786072

VL - 88

SP - 392

EP - 396

JO - Heart

JF - Heart

SN - 1355-6037

IS - 4

ER -