Empowerment in medicine: An analysis of publication trends 1980-2005

Svetla N. Loukanova, John F P Bridges

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper draws attention to the rapid increase in the number of published articles in medicine devoted to issues of empowerment. While our main aim is to identify populations to which empowerment has been applied, we have also offered a brief overview of the literature. A Medline search was used to identify all articles relating to empowerment published between 1980 and 2005. A total of 4496 articles were identified, but after the deletion of articles with non-human applications (n=409) and those published in languages other than English (n=145), a total of 3942 were reviewed. Based on this review, we present a taxonomy of the literature, based on the primary foci, including patients (n=1742, 44%), providers (n=1162, 29%), and society (n=1038, 27%). Over the study period, we document a rapid increase in the numbers of articles devoted to all three categories, but a significant increase in the proportion of papers devoted to patient empowerment (P <0.0001). We conclude by juxtaposing some recent European health care policy reforms that have had mixed consequences for the empowerment of patients and argue for a more scientific approach to the study of empowerment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-110
Number of pages6
JournalCentral European Journal of Medicine
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Publications
Medicine
Patient Participation
Health Care Reform
Health Policy
Language
Power (Psychology)
Population

Keywords

  • Empowerment
  • Health policy
  • Patient empowerment
  • Publication trends

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Empowerment in medicine : An analysis of publication trends 1980-2005. / Loukanova, Svetla N.; Bridges, John F P.

In: Central European Journal of Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 1, 03.2008, p. 105-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Loukanova, Svetla N. ; Bridges, John F P. / Empowerment in medicine : An analysis of publication trends 1980-2005. In: Central European Journal of Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 105-110.
@article{2d279156473d4bee970850be99635675,
title = "Empowerment in medicine: An analysis of publication trends 1980-2005",
abstract = "This paper draws attention to the rapid increase in the number of published articles in medicine devoted to issues of empowerment. While our main aim is to identify populations to which empowerment has been applied, we have also offered a brief overview of the literature. A Medline search was used to identify all articles relating to empowerment published between 1980 and 2005. A total of 4496 articles were identified, but after the deletion of articles with non-human applications (n=409) and those published in languages other than English (n=145), a total of 3942 were reviewed. Based on this review, we present a taxonomy of the literature, based on the primary foci, including patients (n=1742, 44{\%}), providers (n=1162, 29{\%}), and society (n=1038, 27{\%}). Over the study period, we document a rapid increase in the numbers of articles devoted to all three categories, but a significant increase in the proportion of papers devoted to patient empowerment (P <0.0001). We conclude by juxtaposing some recent European health care policy reforms that have had mixed consequences for the empowerment of patients and argue for a more scientific approach to the study of empowerment.",
keywords = "Empowerment, Health policy, Patient empowerment, Publication trends",
author = "Loukanova, {Svetla N.} and Bridges, {John F P}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.2478/s11536-007-0066-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "105--110",
journal = "Central European Journal of Medicine",
issn = "1895-1058",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empowerment in medicine

T2 - An analysis of publication trends 1980-2005

AU - Loukanova, Svetla N.

AU - Bridges, John F P

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - This paper draws attention to the rapid increase in the number of published articles in medicine devoted to issues of empowerment. While our main aim is to identify populations to which empowerment has been applied, we have also offered a brief overview of the literature. A Medline search was used to identify all articles relating to empowerment published between 1980 and 2005. A total of 4496 articles were identified, but after the deletion of articles with non-human applications (n=409) and those published in languages other than English (n=145), a total of 3942 were reviewed. Based on this review, we present a taxonomy of the literature, based on the primary foci, including patients (n=1742, 44%), providers (n=1162, 29%), and society (n=1038, 27%). Over the study period, we document a rapid increase in the numbers of articles devoted to all three categories, but a significant increase in the proportion of papers devoted to patient empowerment (P <0.0001). We conclude by juxtaposing some recent European health care policy reforms that have had mixed consequences for the empowerment of patients and argue for a more scientific approach to the study of empowerment.

AB - This paper draws attention to the rapid increase in the number of published articles in medicine devoted to issues of empowerment. While our main aim is to identify populations to which empowerment has been applied, we have also offered a brief overview of the literature. A Medline search was used to identify all articles relating to empowerment published between 1980 and 2005. A total of 4496 articles were identified, but after the deletion of articles with non-human applications (n=409) and those published in languages other than English (n=145), a total of 3942 were reviewed. Based on this review, we present a taxonomy of the literature, based on the primary foci, including patients (n=1742, 44%), providers (n=1162, 29%), and society (n=1038, 27%). Over the study period, we document a rapid increase in the numbers of articles devoted to all three categories, but a significant increase in the proportion of papers devoted to patient empowerment (P <0.0001). We conclude by juxtaposing some recent European health care policy reforms that have had mixed consequences for the empowerment of patients and argue for a more scientific approach to the study of empowerment.

KW - Empowerment

KW - Health policy

KW - Patient empowerment

KW - Publication trends

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38749122839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38749122839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2478/s11536-007-0066-7

DO - 10.2478/s11536-007-0066-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38749122839

VL - 3

SP - 105

EP - 110

JO - Central European Journal of Medicine

JF - Central European Journal of Medicine

SN - 1895-1058

IS - 1

ER -