Emerging Evidence Toward a 2:1 Clinical to Simulation Ratio: A Study Comparing the Traditional Clinical and Simulation Settings

Nancy J Sullivan, Sandra M. Swoboda, Tonya Breymier, Laura S Lucas, Janice Sarasnick, Tonya Rutherford-Hemming, Chakra B. Budhathoki, Suzan (Suzie) Kardong-Edgren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence comparing the clinical and simulation environments. Methods: This multicenter observational study compared traditional clinical to simulation on the type, number, and level of educational activities as determined by Miller's Pyramid. Results: Forty-two students’ experience revealed that skills, physical assessment, teaching, and critical thinking activities occurred more frequently in simulation, with safety interventions more common in clinical. In addition, in simulation, students performed a greater percentage of activities in higher levels of Millers Pyramid, “Knows How”; 12.8% as compared with 8.6% in clinical, and “Does”; 66.3% as compared with 46.2% in clinical. Notably, the activities in “Does” were completed in approximately 1/5 of the time in simulation; 440 minutes, as compared with clinical; 2,137 minutes. Conclusion: The intensity and efficiency of simulation was demonstrated through the completion of more activities in higher levels of Millers Pyramid in significantly less time than clinical providing emerging evidence toward a 2:1 clinical to simulation ratio.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-41
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Simulation in Nursing
Volume30
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Students
simulation
Pyramid
Multicenter Studies
Observational Studies
evidence
Teaching
Simulation
Safety
Education
Critical Thinking
Observational Study
Simulation Environment
educational activities
Completion
Percentage
Evidence
know how
student
efficiency

Keywords

  • clinical nursing education
  • clinical/simulation ratio
  • Millers pyramid
  • simulation
  • traditional clinical

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Nursing (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Emerging Evidence Toward a 2:1 Clinical to Simulation Ratio : A Study Comparing the Traditional Clinical and Simulation Settings. / Sullivan, Nancy J; Swoboda, Sandra M.; Breymier, Tonya; Lucas, Laura S; Sarasnick, Janice; Rutherford-Hemming, Tonya; Budhathoki, Chakra B.; Kardong-Edgren, Suzan (Suzie).

In: Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Vol. 30, 01.05.2019, p. 34-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sullivan, Nancy J ; Swoboda, Sandra M. ; Breymier, Tonya ; Lucas, Laura S ; Sarasnick, Janice ; Rutherford-Hemming, Tonya ; Budhathoki, Chakra B. ; Kardong-Edgren, Suzan (Suzie). / Emerging Evidence Toward a 2:1 Clinical to Simulation Ratio : A Study Comparing the Traditional Clinical and Simulation Settings. In: Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2019 ; Vol. 30. pp. 34-41.
@article{2b61291d5c2d40ceb8be23fbf0b5e9f3,
title = "Emerging Evidence Toward a 2:1 Clinical to Simulation Ratio: A Study Comparing the Traditional Clinical and Simulation Settings",
abstract = "Background: There is limited evidence comparing the clinical and simulation environments. Methods: This multicenter observational study compared traditional clinical to simulation on the type, number, and level of educational activities as determined by Miller's Pyramid. Results: Forty-two students’ experience revealed that skills, physical assessment, teaching, and critical thinking activities occurred more frequently in simulation, with safety interventions more common in clinical. In addition, in simulation, students performed a greater percentage of activities in higher levels of Millers Pyramid, “Knows How”; 12.8{\%} as compared with 8.6{\%} in clinical, and “Does”; 66.3{\%} as compared with 46.2{\%} in clinical. Notably, the activities in “Does” were completed in approximately 1/5 of the time in simulation; 440 minutes, as compared with clinical; 2,137 minutes. Conclusion: The intensity and efficiency of simulation was demonstrated through the completion of more activities in higher levels of Millers Pyramid in significantly less time than clinical providing emerging evidence toward a 2:1 clinical to simulation ratio.",
keywords = "clinical nursing education, clinical/simulation ratio, Millers pyramid, simulation, traditional clinical",
author = "Sullivan, {Nancy J} and Swoboda, {Sandra M.} and Tonya Breymier and Lucas, {Laura S} and Janice Sarasnick and Tonya Rutherford-Hemming and Budhathoki, {Chakra B.} and Kardong-Edgren, {Suzan (Suzie)}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecns.2019.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "34--41",
journal = "Clinical Simulation in Nursing",
issn = "1876-1399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emerging Evidence Toward a 2:1 Clinical to Simulation Ratio

T2 - A Study Comparing the Traditional Clinical and Simulation Settings

AU - Sullivan, Nancy J

AU - Swoboda, Sandra M.

AU - Breymier, Tonya

AU - Lucas, Laura S

AU - Sarasnick, Janice

AU - Rutherford-Hemming, Tonya

AU - Budhathoki, Chakra B.

AU - Kardong-Edgren, Suzan (Suzie)

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Background: There is limited evidence comparing the clinical and simulation environments. Methods: This multicenter observational study compared traditional clinical to simulation on the type, number, and level of educational activities as determined by Miller's Pyramid. Results: Forty-two students’ experience revealed that skills, physical assessment, teaching, and critical thinking activities occurred more frequently in simulation, with safety interventions more common in clinical. In addition, in simulation, students performed a greater percentage of activities in higher levels of Millers Pyramid, “Knows How”; 12.8% as compared with 8.6% in clinical, and “Does”; 66.3% as compared with 46.2% in clinical. Notably, the activities in “Does” were completed in approximately 1/5 of the time in simulation; 440 minutes, as compared with clinical; 2,137 minutes. Conclusion: The intensity and efficiency of simulation was demonstrated through the completion of more activities in higher levels of Millers Pyramid in significantly less time than clinical providing emerging evidence toward a 2:1 clinical to simulation ratio.

AB - Background: There is limited evidence comparing the clinical and simulation environments. Methods: This multicenter observational study compared traditional clinical to simulation on the type, number, and level of educational activities as determined by Miller's Pyramid. Results: Forty-two students’ experience revealed that skills, physical assessment, teaching, and critical thinking activities occurred more frequently in simulation, with safety interventions more common in clinical. In addition, in simulation, students performed a greater percentage of activities in higher levels of Millers Pyramid, “Knows How”; 12.8% as compared with 8.6% in clinical, and “Does”; 66.3% as compared with 46.2% in clinical. Notably, the activities in “Does” were completed in approximately 1/5 of the time in simulation; 440 minutes, as compared with clinical; 2,137 minutes. Conclusion: The intensity and efficiency of simulation was demonstrated through the completion of more activities in higher levels of Millers Pyramid in significantly less time than clinical providing emerging evidence toward a 2:1 clinical to simulation ratio.

KW - clinical nursing education

KW - clinical/simulation ratio

KW - Millers pyramid

KW - simulation

KW - traditional clinical

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063103715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063103715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecns.2019.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ecns.2019.03.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063103715

VL - 30

SP - 34

EP - 41

JO - Clinical Simulation in Nursing

JF - Clinical Simulation in Nursing

SN - 1876-1399

ER -