Embedded performance validity testing in neuropsychological assessment: Potential clinical tools

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article aims to suggest clinically-useful tools in neuropsychological assessment for efficient use of embedded measures of performance validity. To accomplish this, we integrated available validity-related and statistical research from the literature, consensus statements, and survey-based data from practicing neuropsychologists. We provide recommendations for use of 1) Cutoffs for embedded performance validity tests including Reliable Digit Span, California Verbal Learning Test (Second Edition) Forced Choice Recognition, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test Combination Score, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Failure to Maintain Set, and the Finger Tapping Test; 2) Selecting number of performance validity measures to administer in an assessment; and 3) Hypothetical clinical decision-making models for use of performance validity testing in a neuropsychological assessment collectively considering behavior, patient reporting, and data indicating invalid or noncredible performance. Performance validity testing helps inform the clinician about an individual’s general approach to tasks: response to failure, task engagement and persistence, compliance with task demands. Data-driven clinical suggestions provide a resource to clinicians and to instigate conversation within the field to make more uniform, testable decisions to further the discussion, and guide future research in this area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalApplied Neuropsychology:Adult
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 28 2017

Fingerprint

Verbal Learning
Fingers
Consensus
Research Design
Research
Recognition (Psychology)
Clinical Decision-Making
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • clinical neuropsychology
  • effort
  • embedded measures
  • malingering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{74a27036acac473db6d72ad60b405260,
title = "Embedded performance validity testing in neuropsychological assessment: Potential clinical tools",
abstract = "The article aims to suggest clinically-useful tools in neuropsychological assessment for efficient use of embedded measures of performance validity. To accomplish this, we integrated available validity-related and statistical research from the literature, consensus statements, and survey-based data from practicing neuropsychologists. We provide recommendations for use of 1) Cutoffs for embedded performance validity tests including Reliable Digit Span, California Verbal Learning Test (Second Edition) Forced Choice Recognition, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test Combination Score, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Failure to Maintain Set, and the Finger Tapping Test; 2) Selecting number of performance validity measures to administer in an assessment; and 3) Hypothetical clinical decision-making models for use of performance validity testing in a neuropsychological assessment collectively considering behavior, patient reporting, and data indicating invalid or noncredible performance. Performance validity testing helps inform the clinician about an individual’s general approach to tasks: response to failure, task engagement and persistence, compliance with task demands. Data-driven clinical suggestions provide a resource to clinicians and to instigate conversation within the field to make more uniform, testable decisions to further the discussion, and guide future research in this area.",
keywords = "Assessment, clinical neuropsychology, effort, embedded measures, malingering",
author = "Rickards, {Tyler A.} and Christopher Cranston and Pegah Touradji and Kortte, {Kathleen Bechtold}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/23279095.2017.1278602",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Applied neuropsychology. Adult",
issn = "0908-4282",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embedded performance validity testing in neuropsychological assessment

T2 - Potential clinical tools

AU - Rickards, Tyler A.

AU - Cranston, Christopher

AU - Touradji, Pegah

AU - Kortte, Kathleen Bechtold

PY - 2017/1/28

Y1 - 2017/1/28

N2 - The article aims to suggest clinically-useful tools in neuropsychological assessment for efficient use of embedded measures of performance validity. To accomplish this, we integrated available validity-related and statistical research from the literature, consensus statements, and survey-based data from practicing neuropsychologists. We provide recommendations for use of 1) Cutoffs for embedded performance validity tests including Reliable Digit Span, California Verbal Learning Test (Second Edition) Forced Choice Recognition, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test Combination Score, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Failure to Maintain Set, and the Finger Tapping Test; 2) Selecting number of performance validity measures to administer in an assessment; and 3) Hypothetical clinical decision-making models for use of performance validity testing in a neuropsychological assessment collectively considering behavior, patient reporting, and data indicating invalid or noncredible performance. Performance validity testing helps inform the clinician about an individual’s general approach to tasks: response to failure, task engagement and persistence, compliance with task demands. Data-driven clinical suggestions provide a resource to clinicians and to instigate conversation within the field to make more uniform, testable decisions to further the discussion, and guide future research in this area.

AB - The article aims to suggest clinically-useful tools in neuropsychological assessment for efficient use of embedded measures of performance validity. To accomplish this, we integrated available validity-related and statistical research from the literature, consensus statements, and survey-based data from practicing neuropsychologists. We provide recommendations for use of 1) Cutoffs for embedded performance validity tests including Reliable Digit Span, California Verbal Learning Test (Second Edition) Forced Choice Recognition, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test Combination Score, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Failure to Maintain Set, and the Finger Tapping Test; 2) Selecting number of performance validity measures to administer in an assessment; and 3) Hypothetical clinical decision-making models for use of performance validity testing in a neuropsychological assessment collectively considering behavior, patient reporting, and data indicating invalid or noncredible performance. Performance validity testing helps inform the clinician about an individual’s general approach to tasks: response to failure, task engagement and persistence, compliance with task demands. Data-driven clinical suggestions provide a resource to clinicians and to instigate conversation within the field to make more uniform, testable decisions to further the discussion, and guide future research in this area.

KW - Assessment

KW - clinical neuropsychology

KW - effort

KW - embedded measures

KW - malingering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011295539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011295539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23279095.2017.1278602

DO - 10.1080/23279095.2017.1278602

M3 - Article

C2 - 28139144

AN - SCOPUS:85011295539

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Applied neuropsychology. Adult

JF - Applied neuropsychology. Adult

SN - 0908-4282

ER -