ELISA and multiplex technologies for cytokine measurement in inflammation and aging research

Sean X. Leng, Janet E. McElhaney, Jeremy D. Walston, Dongxu Xie, Neal S. Fedarko, George A. Kuchel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Over the last decade there has been an enormous expansion of research focused on defining the role of inflammation in aging, age-related diseases, disability, and frailty. The availability of methods to measure cytokines and other inflammatory mediators or markers with high sensitivity and specificity is critically important. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the most widely used and best validated method, is limited by its ability to measure only a single protein in each sample. Recent developments in serum cytokine quantification technology include multiplex arrays, which offer the potential of better evaluating the complexity and dynamic nature of inflammatory responses and offer substantial cost and sample savings over traditional ELISA measurements. Despite potential advantages of this new technology, experience with these techniques is limited, and it has not emerged to date as the gold standard in inflammatory mediator measurement. This article reviews ELISA and the emerging multiplex technologies, compares the cost and effectiveness of recently developed multiplex arrays with traditional ELISA technology, and provides specific recommendations for investigators interested in measuring serum inflammatory mediators in older adults.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)879-884
Number of pages6
JournalJournals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Volume63
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2008

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Cytokines
  • ELISA
  • Inflammation
  • Multiplex arrays

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'ELISA and multiplex technologies for cytokine measurement in inflammation and aging research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this