TY - JOUR
T1 - Elementary school-aged children's reports of their health
T2 - A cognitive interviewing study
AU - Rebok, G.
AU - Riley, A.
AU - Forrest, C.
AU - Starfield, B.
AU - Green, B.
AU - Robertson, J.
AU - Tambor, E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by (what is now) the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) grant HS07045 and AHRQ also supported the development of the CHIP-AE. The authors would like to thank the daycare and clinic staff and the parents and children for allowing us to conduct the health interviews. We would also like to thank Walt Carr for his expert drawing of the cartoon illustrations used in the cognitive interviewing and Phyllis Friello for her excellent comments on the manuscript. Pediatricians Sue Furth, Marlene Miller, and Trish DeRusso assisted us with recruitment of the clinical samples. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August 1998 and at the seventh Survey Research Conference, Williamsburg, VA, September 1999.
Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - There are no standard methods for assessing the quality of young children's perceptions of their health and well-being and their ability to comprehend the tasks involved in reporting their health. This research involved three cross-sectional studies using cognitive interviews of 5-11-year-old children (N = 114) to determine their ability to respond to various presentations of pictorially illustrated questions about their health. The samples had a predominance of children in the 5-7-year-old range and families of lower and middle socio-economic status. The research questions in Study 1 involved children's ability to convert their health experiences into scaled responses and relate them to illustrated items (n = 35); Study 2 focused on the type of response format most effectively used by children (n = 19); and Study 3 involved testing children's understanding of health-related terms and use of a specific recall period (n = 60). The results of Study 1 showed that children identified with the cartoon drawing of a child depicted in the illustrated items, typically responding that the child was at or near their own age and of the same gender, with no differences related to race. Study 2 results indicated that children responded effectively to circles of graduated sizes to indicate their response and preferred them to same-size circles or a visual analogue scale. Tests of three-, four-, and five-point response formats demonstrated that children could use them all without confusion. In Study 3, expected age-related differences in understanding were obtained. In fact, the 5-year-old children were unable to understand a sufficient number of items to adequately describe their health. Virtually all children 8 years of age and older were able to fully understand the key terms and presentation of items, used the full five-point range of response options, and accurately used a 4-week recall period. Six- and seven-year-olds were more likely than older children to use only the extreme and middle responses on a five-point scale. No pattern of gender differences in understanding or in use of response options was found. We conclude that children as young as eight are able to report on all aspects of their health experiences and can use a five-point response format. Children aged 6-7 had difficulty with some health-related terms and tended to use extreme responses, but they understood the basic task requirements and were able to report on their health experiences. These results provide the guidance needed to develop and test a pediatric health status questionnaire for children 6-11 years old.
AB - There are no standard methods for assessing the quality of young children's perceptions of their health and well-being and their ability to comprehend the tasks involved in reporting their health. This research involved three cross-sectional studies using cognitive interviews of 5-11-year-old children (N = 114) to determine their ability to respond to various presentations of pictorially illustrated questions about their health. The samples had a predominance of children in the 5-7-year-old range and families of lower and middle socio-economic status. The research questions in Study 1 involved children's ability to convert their health experiences into scaled responses and relate them to illustrated items (n = 35); Study 2 focused on the type of response format most effectively used by children (n = 19); and Study 3 involved testing children's understanding of health-related terms and use of a specific recall period (n = 60). The results of Study 1 showed that children identified with the cartoon drawing of a child depicted in the illustrated items, typically responding that the child was at or near their own age and of the same gender, with no differences related to race. Study 2 results indicated that children responded effectively to circles of graduated sizes to indicate their response and preferred them to same-size circles or a visual analogue scale. Tests of three-, four-, and five-point response formats demonstrated that children could use them all without confusion. In Study 3, expected age-related differences in understanding were obtained. In fact, the 5-year-old children were unable to understand a sufficient number of items to adequately describe their health. Virtually all children 8 years of age and older were able to fully understand the key terms and presentation of items, used the full five-point range of response options, and accurately used a 4-week recall period. Six- and seven-year-olds were more likely than older children to use only the extreme and middle responses on a five-point scale. No pattern of gender differences in understanding or in use of response options was found. We conclude that children as young as eight are able to report on all aspects of their health experiences and can use a five-point response format. Children aged 6-7 had difficulty with some health-related terms and tended to use extreme responses, but they understood the basic task requirements and were able to report on their health experiences. These results provide the guidance needed to develop and test a pediatric health status questionnaire for children 6-11 years old.
KW - Child health status
KW - Cognitive interviewing
KW - Health assessment
KW - Response format
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034920942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034920942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1016693417166
DO - 10.1023/A:1016693417166
M3 - Article
C2 - 11508476
AN - SCOPUS:0034920942
SN - 0962-9343
VL - 10
SP - 59
EP - 70
JO - Quality of Life Research
JF - Quality of Life Research
IS - 1
ER -