Electrophysiological monitoring during basilar aneurysm operation

J. R. Little, Ronald P Lesser, H. Luders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Intraoperative brain stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP)monitoring was evaluated in 16 patients each undergoing intracranial operation for basilar artery aneurysm. The 16 patients had 18 posterior circulation aneurysms, including 2 patients with 2 aneurysms. Fourteen aneurysms arose from the rostral basilar artery, 2 arose from the midbasilar artery, 1 arose from the vertebrobasilar junction, and 1 arose from the proximal segment of the posterior cerebral artery. Five aneurysms were classified as giant (i.e., > 25 mm), and 5 aneurysms were large (i.e., 15 to 25 mm). Ten patients had BAEP and SEP monitoring, 4 had BAEP monitoring only, and 2 had SEP monitoring only. Two patients showed significant abnormalities during operation, including 1 patient with transient changes in the BAEP when the lower pons and the 8th cranial nerve were retracted. Another patient had progressive increases in latency and decreases in amplitude and subsequent loss of the SEP cortical components during a period of intermittent temporary rostral basilar artery occlusion. Wave P13 was also lost during that period. The cortical components as well as Wave P13 returned after circulation was restored. The BAEPs were unchanged in the same patient during the period of temporary basilar artery occlusion. Fourteen patients had no significant abnormalities. There were no consistent changes during the various stages of operation. BAEP and SEP monitoring failed to identify ischemic events in 4 patients with neurologgical findings of brain stem ischemia immediately after operation (i.e., 25% false-negative studies). Failure of these techniques to predict brain stem ischemia seemed to be the result of two factors: (a) the ischemic events involved relatively small areas and (b) the ischemic zones did not include the neural pathways that were being monitored. These limitations were particularly relevent for the aneurysm at the basilar bifurcation, the most common location for posterior circulation aneurysm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)421-427
Number of pages7
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume20
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aneurysm
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Basilar Artery
Brain Ischemia
Brain Stem
Posterior Cerebral Artery
Neural Pathways
Pons
Cranial Nerves
Intracranial Aneurysm
Arteries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Electrophysiological monitoring during basilar aneurysm operation. / Little, J. R.; Lesser, Ronald P; Luders, H.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1987, p. 421-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Little, JR, Lesser, RP & Luders, H 1987, 'Electrophysiological monitoring during basilar aneurysm operation', Neurosurgery, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 421-427.
Little, J. R. ; Lesser, Ronald P ; Luders, H. / Electrophysiological monitoring during basilar aneurysm operation. In: Neurosurgery. 1987 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 421-427.
@article{99ae88dbcbaf4d4e9365fb46c96d4701,
title = "Electrophysiological monitoring during basilar aneurysm operation",
abstract = "Intraoperative brain stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP)monitoring was evaluated in 16 patients each undergoing intracranial operation for basilar artery aneurysm. The 16 patients had 18 posterior circulation aneurysms, including 2 patients with 2 aneurysms. Fourteen aneurysms arose from the rostral basilar artery, 2 arose from the midbasilar artery, 1 arose from the vertebrobasilar junction, and 1 arose from the proximal segment of the posterior cerebral artery. Five aneurysms were classified as giant (i.e., > 25 mm), and 5 aneurysms were large (i.e., 15 to 25 mm). Ten patients had BAEP and SEP monitoring, 4 had BAEP monitoring only, and 2 had SEP monitoring only. Two patients showed significant abnormalities during operation, including 1 patient with transient changes in the BAEP when the lower pons and the 8th cranial nerve were retracted. Another patient had progressive increases in latency and decreases in amplitude and subsequent loss of the SEP cortical components during a period of intermittent temporary rostral basilar artery occlusion. Wave P13 was also lost during that period. The cortical components as well as Wave P13 returned after circulation was restored. The BAEPs were unchanged in the same patient during the period of temporary basilar artery occlusion. Fourteen patients had no significant abnormalities. There were no consistent changes during the various stages of operation. BAEP and SEP monitoring failed to identify ischemic events in 4 patients with neurologgical findings of brain stem ischemia immediately after operation (i.e., 25{\%} false-negative studies). Failure of these techniques to predict brain stem ischemia seemed to be the result of two factors: (a) the ischemic events involved relatively small areas and (b) the ischemic zones did not include the neural pathways that were being monitored. These limitations were particularly relevent for the aneurysm at the basilar bifurcation, the most common location for posterior circulation aneurysm.",
author = "Little, {J. R.} and Lesser, {Ronald P} and H. Luders",
year = "1987",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "421--427",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrophysiological monitoring during basilar aneurysm operation

AU - Little, J. R.

AU - Lesser, Ronald P

AU - Luders, H.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - Intraoperative brain stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP)monitoring was evaluated in 16 patients each undergoing intracranial operation for basilar artery aneurysm. The 16 patients had 18 posterior circulation aneurysms, including 2 patients with 2 aneurysms. Fourteen aneurysms arose from the rostral basilar artery, 2 arose from the midbasilar artery, 1 arose from the vertebrobasilar junction, and 1 arose from the proximal segment of the posterior cerebral artery. Five aneurysms were classified as giant (i.e., > 25 mm), and 5 aneurysms were large (i.e., 15 to 25 mm). Ten patients had BAEP and SEP monitoring, 4 had BAEP monitoring only, and 2 had SEP monitoring only. Two patients showed significant abnormalities during operation, including 1 patient with transient changes in the BAEP when the lower pons and the 8th cranial nerve were retracted. Another patient had progressive increases in latency and decreases in amplitude and subsequent loss of the SEP cortical components during a period of intermittent temporary rostral basilar artery occlusion. Wave P13 was also lost during that period. The cortical components as well as Wave P13 returned after circulation was restored. The BAEPs were unchanged in the same patient during the period of temporary basilar artery occlusion. Fourteen patients had no significant abnormalities. There were no consistent changes during the various stages of operation. BAEP and SEP monitoring failed to identify ischemic events in 4 patients with neurologgical findings of brain stem ischemia immediately after operation (i.e., 25% false-negative studies). Failure of these techniques to predict brain stem ischemia seemed to be the result of two factors: (a) the ischemic events involved relatively small areas and (b) the ischemic zones did not include the neural pathways that were being monitored. These limitations were particularly relevent for the aneurysm at the basilar bifurcation, the most common location for posterior circulation aneurysm.

AB - Intraoperative brain stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP)monitoring was evaluated in 16 patients each undergoing intracranial operation for basilar artery aneurysm. The 16 patients had 18 posterior circulation aneurysms, including 2 patients with 2 aneurysms. Fourteen aneurysms arose from the rostral basilar artery, 2 arose from the midbasilar artery, 1 arose from the vertebrobasilar junction, and 1 arose from the proximal segment of the posterior cerebral artery. Five aneurysms were classified as giant (i.e., > 25 mm), and 5 aneurysms were large (i.e., 15 to 25 mm). Ten patients had BAEP and SEP monitoring, 4 had BAEP monitoring only, and 2 had SEP monitoring only. Two patients showed significant abnormalities during operation, including 1 patient with transient changes in the BAEP when the lower pons and the 8th cranial nerve were retracted. Another patient had progressive increases in latency and decreases in amplitude and subsequent loss of the SEP cortical components during a period of intermittent temporary rostral basilar artery occlusion. Wave P13 was also lost during that period. The cortical components as well as Wave P13 returned after circulation was restored. The BAEPs were unchanged in the same patient during the period of temporary basilar artery occlusion. Fourteen patients had no significant abnormalities. There were no consistent changes during the various stages of operation. BAEP and SEP monitoring failed to identify ischemic events in 4 patients with neurologgical findings of brain stem ischemia immediately after operation (i.e., 25% false-negative studies). Failure of these techniques to predict brain stem ischemia seemed to be the result of two factors: (a) the ischemic events involved relatively small areas and (b) the ischemic zones did not include the neural pathways that were being monitored. These limitations were particularly relevent for the aneurysm at the basilar bifurcation, the most common location for posterior circulation aneurysm.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023133572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023133572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3574618

AN - SCOPUS:0023133572

VL - 20

SP - 421

EP - 427

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 3

ER -